Pharmacist-Driven Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Minimization in the Intensive Care Unit
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis is routinely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in critically ill patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 17, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2024
CompletedMarch 23, 2026
January 1, 2024
2 months
July 6, 2023
March 19, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
compare the incidence of overt GI bleeds
To compare the incidence of overt GI bleeds (defined as hematemesis, bloody nasogastric tube aspirate, or melena) between patients who were on stress ulcer prophylaxis versus patients whose acid suppression therapy was discontinued through the stress ulcer prophylaxis minimization protocol.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Identify the acid suppressive therapy reorder rate
24 hours
Number of doses avoided
24 hours
Incidences of hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP)
24 hours
Incidences of C.Difficile infection
24 hours
ICU length of stay
24 hours
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Protocol Group
Patients will be analyzed during the time frame of February 2020 to February 2023 for the protocol group
Non Protocol Group
Patients will be analyzed during the time frame of February 2017 to February 2020 for the non-protocol group.
Interventions
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a pharmacist-driven protocol to discontinue stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients when it is no longer indicated according to pre-defined criteria. To compare the incidence of overt GI bleeds (defined as hematemesis, bloody nasogastric tube aspirate, or melena) between patients who were on stress ulcer prophylaxis versus patients whose acid suppression therapy was discontinued through the stress ulcer prophylaxis minimization protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients ≥18 years ICU location status stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients when it is no longer indicated according to pre-defined criteria.
You may qualify if:
- Patients ≥18 years ICU location status
You may not qualify if:
- If patient has one of the following:
- Coagulopathy (defined as: platelets \< 50,000/µL, international normalized ratio(INR) \> 1.5, or partial thromboplastin time \> 2 times the control value)
- Mechanical ventilation for \> 48 hours and on \< 50% goal tube feeds
- Shock state on vasopressors/inotropes and on \< 50% goal tube feeds (or \< 50% of diet)
- On total parenteral nutrition
- Use of acid suppressive therapy prior to admission
- Admission with GI bleeding
- History of peptic ulcer disease
- Surgery on the GI tract or cardiac surgery during the current hospital admission
- Pregnancy
- H. pylori infection treatment
- Hypersecretory disorder (ex: Zollinger-Ellison)
- Known erosive esophagitis/gastritis (not heartburn or gastroesophageal reflux disease)
- Traumatic brain injury with Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 10
- Major burn (˃30% body surface area)
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Methodist Richardson Medical Center
Richardson, Texas, 75082, United States
Related Publications (10)
Cook D, Guyatt G. Prophylaxis against Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2506-2516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1605507. No abstract available.
PMID: 29949497BACKGROUNDCook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, Marshall JC, Leasa D, Hall R, Winton TL, Rutledge F, Todd TJ, Roy P, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):377-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300601.
PMID: 8284001BACKGROUNDASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis. ASHP Commission on Therapeutics and approved by the ASHP Board of Directors on November 14, 1998. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999 Feb 15;56(4):347-79. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/56.4.347. No abstract available.
PMID: 10690219BACKGROUND4. Guillamondegui OD, et al. Practice management guidelines for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST); 2008.
BACKGROUNDSaeed M, Bass S, Chaisson NF. Which ICU patients need stress ulcer prophylaxis? Cleve Clin J Med. 2022 Jul 1;89(7):363-367. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.89a.21085.
PMID: 35777844BACKGROUNDKantorova I, Svoboda P, Scheer P, Doubek J, Rehorkova D, Bosakova H, Ochmann J. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun;51(57):757-61.
PMID: 15143910BACKGROUNDMarik PE, Vasu T, Hirani A, Pachinburavan M. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the new millennium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2222-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f17adf.
PMID: 20711074BACKGROUNDSelvanderan SP, Summers MJ, Finnis ME, Plummer MP, Ali Abdelhamid Y, Anderson MB, Chapman MJ, Rayner CK, Deane AM. Pantoprazole or Placebo for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (POP-UP): Randomized Double-Blind Exploratory Study. Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):1842-50. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001819.
PMID: 27635481BACKGROUNDOgasawara O, Kojima T, Miyazu M, Sobue K. Impact of the stress ulcer prophylactic protocol on reducing the unnecessary administration of stress ulcer medications and gastrointestinal bleeding: a single-center, retrospective pre-post study. J Intensive Care. 2020 Jan 16;8:10. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-0427-8. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 31988751BACKGROUND11. Dhand, ND, Khatkar MS (2014). Statulator: An online statistical calculator. Sample Size Calculator for Comparing Two Independent Proportions. Accessed 16 March 2023 at http://statulator.com/SampleSize/ss2P.html.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heidi Michaels, PharmD
Methodist Health System
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2023
First Posted
January 25, 2024
Study Start
May 13, 2023
Primary Completion
July 17, 2023
Study Completion
July 17, 2023
Last Updated
March 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 3 years
- Access Criteria
- Clinical Research Institute
Study data or any protected health information will not be shared with anyone that is not delegated to the study. The PI is committed to disseminate research results in a timely fashion. Sharing of results generated by the data analysis during the course of the project will be through presentation at national scientific meetings and/or publication in open access journals. All information obtained will be source de-identified and presented on a large scale and not traceable to any one particular individual.