NCT06225167

Brief Summary

Pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis is routinely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in critically ill patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 13, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 6, 2023

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 17, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 17, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 23, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

July 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • compare the incidence of overt GI bleeds

    To compare the incidence of overt GI bleeds (defined as hematemesis, bloody nasogastric tube aspirate, or melena) between patients who were on stress ulcer prophylaxis versus patients whose acid suppression therapy was discontinued through the stress ulcer prophylaxis minimization protocol.

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Identify the acid suppressive therapy reorder rate

    24 hours

  • Number of doses avoided

    24 hours

  • Incidences of hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP)

    24 hours

  • Incidences of C.Difficile infection

    24 hours

  • ICU length of stay

    24 hours

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Protocol Group

Patients will be analyzed during the time frame of February 2020 to February 2023 for the protocol group

Behavioral: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a pharmacist-driven protocol to discontinue stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients when it is no longer indicated according to pre-defined criteria.

Non Protocol Group

Patients will be analyzed during the time frame of February 2017 to February 2020 for the non-protocol group.

Behavioral: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a pharmacist-driven protocol to discontinue stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients when it is no longer indicated according to pre-defined criteria.

Interventions

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a pharmacist-driven protocol to discontinue stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients when it is no longer indicated according to pre-defined criteria. To compare the incidence of overt GI bleeds (defined as hematemesis, bloody nasogastric tube aspirate, or melena) between patients who were on stress ulcer prophylaxis versus patients whose acid suppression therapy was discontinued through the stress ulcer prophylaxis minimization protocol.

Non Protocol GroupProtocol Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients ≥18 years ICU location status stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients when it is no longer indicated according to pre-defined criteria.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients ≥18 years ICU location status

You may not qualify if:

  • If patient has one of the following:
  • Coagulopathy (defined as: platelets \< 50,000/µL, international normalized ratio(INR) \> 1.5, or partial thromboplastin time \> 2 times the control value)
  • Mechanical ventilation for \> 48 hours and on \< 50% goal tube feeds
  • Shock state on vasopressors/inotropes and on \< 50% goal tube feeds (or \< 50% of diet)
  • On total parenteral nutrition
  • Use of acid suppressive therapy prior to admission
  • Admission with GI bleeding
  • History of peptic ulcer disease
  • Surgery on the GI tract or cardiac surgery during the current hospital admission
  • Pregnancy
  • H. pylori infection treatment
  • Hypersecretory disorder (ex: Zollinger-Ellison)
  • Known erosive esophagitis/gastritis (not heartburn or gastroesophageal reflux disease)
  • Traumatic brain injury with Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 10
  • Major burn (˃30% body surface area)
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Methodist Richardson Medical Center

Richardson, Texas, 75082, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Cook D, Guyatt G. Prophylaxis against Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2506-2516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1605507. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29949497BACKGROUND
  • Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, Marshall JC, Leasa D, Hall R, Winton TL, Rutledge F, Todd TJ, Roy P, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):377-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300601.

    PMID: 8284001BACKGROUND
  • ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis. ASHP Commission on Therapeutics and approved by the ASHP Board of Directors on November 14, 1998. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999 Feb 15;56(4):347-79. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/56.4.347. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10690219BACKGROUND
  • 4. Guillamondegui OD, et al. Practice management guidelines for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST); 2008.

    BACKGROUND
  • Saeed M, Bass S, Chaisson NF. Which ICU patients need stress ulcer prophylaxis? Cleve Clin J Med. 2022 Jul 1;89(7):363-367. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.89a.21085.

    PMID: 35777844BACKGROUND
  • Kantorova I, Svoboda P, Scheer P, Doubek J, Rehorkova D, Bosakova H, Ochmann J. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun;51(57):757-61.

    PMID: 15143910BACKGROUND
  • Marik PE, Vasu T, Hirani A, Pachinburavan M. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the new millennium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2222-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f17adf.

    PMID: 20711074BACKGROUND
  • Selvanderan SP, Summers MJ, Finnis ME, Plummer MP, Ali Abdelhamid Y, Anderson MB, Chapman MJ, Rayner CK, Deane AM. Pantoprazole or Placebo for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (POP-UP): Randomized Double-Blind Exploratory Study. Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):1842-50. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001819.

    PMID: 27635481BACKGROUND
  • Ogasawara O, Kojima T, Miyazu M, Sobue K. Impact of the stress ulcer prophylactic protocol on reducing the unnecessary administration of stress ulcer medications and gastrointestinal bleeding: a single-center, retrospective pre-post study. J Intensive Care. 2020 Jan 16;8:10. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-0427-8. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 31988751BACKGROUND
  • 11. Dhand, ND, Khatkar MS (2014). Statulator: An online statistical calculator. Sample Size Calculator for Comparing Two Independent Proportions. Accessed 16 March 2023 at http://statulator.com/SampleSize/ss2P.html.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Duodenal Ulcer

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peptic UlcerDuodenal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesStomach Diseases

Study Officials

  • Heidi Michaels, PharmD

    Methodist Health System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2023

First Posted

January 25, 2024

Study Start

May 13, 2023

Primary Completion

July 17, 2023

Study Completion

July 17, 2023

Last Updated

March 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Study data or any protected health information will not be shared with anyone that is not delegated to the study. The PI is committed to disseminate research results in a timely fashion. Sharing of results generated by the data analysis during the course of the project will be through presentation at national scientific meetings and/or publication in open access journals. All information obtained will be source de-identified and presented on a large scale and not traceable to any one particular individual.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
3 years
Access Criteria
Clinical Research Institute

Locations