Heparin-Free Chronic HemoDialysis Assessment
HepFreeHD
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intermittent hemodialysis is a complex technique which requires careful monitoring of anticoagulation levels to prevent clotting and reduce the risk of bleeding complications. Dialysis patients often exhibit hypercoagulable tendencies due to uremic state, turbulent blood flows in dialysis procedures, and thrombogenic exposure to artificial surfaces of dialysis tubing. Patients with ESRD may experience both dialyzer clotting and excessive bleeding, so individualized heparin dosing and periodic adjustments are necessary to ensure adequate anticoagulation during hemodialysis. The ideal anticoagulant should prevent thrombosis while minimizing the risk of intra- and interdialytic bleeding. The use of heparin carries risks such as worsening of osteoporosis and dyslipidemia, allergic reactions like pruritus, and the potential for life-threatening heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) for which avoidance of heparin is necessary during dialysis.Heparin, in both its unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) forms, is the most commonly used anticoagulant, though evidence comparing their efficacy and risk of bleeding remains inconclusive. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, who are already at higher risk of serious bleeding, may benefit from regional anticoagulation (RA) techniques, as they typically receive around 600,000 IU of heparin per year. The investigators performed routinely a simplified regional anticoagulation procedure (RAP) using a constant calcium re-injection rate over the time to avoid hypocalcemia. This procedure eliminates the need for citrate infusion and calcium monitoring, and reduces nurse workload in a chronic dialysis unit. The investigators compared 21 chronic dialysis patients with 198 RA and 195 heparin sessions, where each patient acted as their own control. None of them were on VKA during the RA sessions, 62% were on single anti-platelet therapy and 14% were on dual anti-platelet therapy. The dialysis session success rate was 94% in the RA group and 97% in the heparin group, with no significant differences (p=0.22). The circuit loss rate was 1.5% per RA session and 0.5% per heparin session (p=0.23), and the early blood restitution rate was 3% and 1.5% (p=0.50) in the RA and heparin groups, respectively Hypothesis: RAP can be as effective as systemic anticoagulation with heparin for intermittent dialysis in chronic hemodialysis patients, with the potential to reduce the rate of hemorrhagic events
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
October 26, 2024
October 1, 2024
2.2 years
January 16, 2024
October 23, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Demonstrate the non-inferiority of the regional anticoagulation procedure compared to heparin anticoagulation on the dialysis sessions success three times per week
The primary endpoint will be the rate of dialysis sessions success over 6 months between two therapeutic strategies: * Regional anticoagulation procedure (RAP) * Heparin anticoagulation
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Compare between the groups clinical Impact at each dialyses session on bypass loss
6 months
Compare between the groups clinical Impact at each dialyses session on early bypass restitution
6 months
Compare between the groups clinical Impact at each dialyses session on dialysis duration
6 months
Compare between the groups clinical Impact at each dialyses session on fistula compression time extended more than 10 minutes
6 months
Compare between the groups clinical Impact during the total duration of the study on incidence of hemorrhagic events
6 months
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Heparin Anticoagulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORRegional Anticoagulation Procedure (RAP)
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Conventional dialysis with heparin as anticoagulant treatment
Dialysis without heparin as anticoagulant but based on the use of a calcium-free dialysis bath. Calcium is then restored by reinjection of a 10% calcium chloride solution.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Man or woman aged 18 years or more
- Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) under intermittent hemodialysis, for more than 3 months prior to screening and with a dialysis duration prescription of at least 4 hours
- Effective anticoagulation either by UFH or by LMWH of the dialysis session defined by the absence of circuit loss in the last 3 months.
- Dialysis adequacy defined by a mean Kt/V ≥1.2.
- Subject affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security system.
- Subject having signed written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Dysfunctional vascular access at the screening
- Unipunction of the AVF
- Patient treated by hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration procedure
- Current anticoagulation treatment
- Patient treated by digitalizing drugs
- Patient treated by thiazide diuretics
- Patient with hypercalcemia and/or hypercalciuria
- History of sensitivity to heparin or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
- Active hemorrhage
- High bleeding risk defined by the following situations: recent bleeding of less than 7 days, recent post-operative period of less than 7 days, recent head trauma of less than 7 days, recent ischemic stroke of less than 7 days, uremic pericarditis.
- Body weight \< 45 kg and \> 140 kg at screening.
- Known allergy to citrate
- Hospitalization at the screening for all other causes apart from dialysis
- Moribund status (defined by the expectation of death in less than three months).
- Liver failure (to prevent citrate liver toxicity) based on the results of the last monthly or quarterly blood test
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital de la Conception
Marseille, Bouches du Rhône, 13885, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2024
First Posted
January 25, 2024
Study Start
June 6, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
October 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share