NCT06224140

Brief Summary

Intermittent hemodialysis is a complex technique which requires careful monitoring of anticoagulation levels to prevent clotting and reduce the risk of bleeding complications. Dialysis patients often exhibit hypercoagulable tendencies due to uremic state, turbulent blood flows in dialysis procedures, and thrombogenic exposure to artificial surfaces of dialysis tubing. Patients with ESRD may experience both dialyzer clotting and excessive bleeding, so individualized heparin dosing and periodic adjustments are necessary to ensure adequate anticoagulation during hemodialysis. The ideal anticoagulant should prevent thrombosis while minimizing the risk of intra- and interdialytic bleeding. The use of heparin carries risks such as worsening of osteoporosis and dyslipidemia, allergic reactions like pruritus, and the potential for life-threatening heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) for which avoidance of heparin is necessary during dialysis.Heparin, in both its unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) forms, is the most commonly used anticoagulant, though evidence comparing their efficacy and risk of bleeding remains inconclusive. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, who are already at higher risk of serious bleeding, may benefit from regional anticoagulation (RA) techniques, as they typically receive around 600,000 IU of heparin per year. The investigators performed routinely a simplified regional anticoagulation procedure (RAP) using a constant calcium re-injection rate over the time to avoid hypocalcemia. This procedure eliminates the need for citrate infusion and calcium monitoring, and reduces nurse workload in a chronic dialysis unit. The investigators compared 21 chronic dialysis patients with 198 RA and 195 heparin sessions, where each patient acted as their own control. None of them were on VKA during the RA sessions, 62% were on single anti-platelet therapy and 14% were on dual anti-platelet therapy. The dialysis session success rate was 94% in the RA group and 97% in the heparin group, with no significant differences (p=0.22). The circuit loss rate was 1.5% per RA session and 0.5% per heparin session (p=0.23), and the early blood restitution rate was 3% and 1.5% (p=0.50) in the RA and heparin groups, respectively Hypothesis: RAP can be as effective as systemic anticoagulation with heparin for intermittent dialysis in chronic hemodialysis patients, with the potential to reduce the rate of hemorrhagic events

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Jun 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress86%
Jun 2024Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 6, 2024

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

October 26, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

January 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Demonstrate the non-inferiority of the regional anticoagulation procedure compared to heparin anticoagulation on the dialysis sessions success three times per week

    The primary endpoint will be the rate of dialysis sessions success over 6 months between two therapeutic strategies: * Regional anticoagulation procedure (RAP) * Heparin anticoagulation

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Compare between the groups clinical Impact at each dialyses session on bypass loss

    6 months

  • Compare between the groups clinical Impact at each dialyses session on early bypass restitution

    6 months

  • Compare between the groups clinical Impact at each dialyses session on dialysis duration

    6 months

  • Compare between the groups clinical Impact at each dialyses session on fistula compression time extended more than 10 minutes

    6 months

  • Compare between the groups clinical Impact during the total duration of the study on incidence of hemorrhagic events

    6 months

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Heparin Anticoagulation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Heparin Anticoagulation

Regional Anticoagulation Procedure (RAP)

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Regional Anticoagulation Procedure (RAP)

Interventions

Conventional dialysis with heparin as anticoagulant treatment

Heparin Anticoagulation

Dialysis without heparin as anticoagulant but based on the use of a calcium-free dialysis bath. Calcium is then restored by reinjection of a 10% calcium chloride solution.

Regional Anticoagulation Procedure (RAP)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Man or woman aged 18 years or more
  • Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) under intermittent hemodialysis, for more than 3 months prior to screening and with a dialysis duration prescription of at least 4 hours
  • Effective anticoagulation either by UFH or by LMWH of the dialysis session defined by the absence of circuit loss in the last 3 months.
  • Dialysis adequacy defined by a mean Kt/V ≥1.2.
  • Subject affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security system.
  • Subject having signed written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Dysfunctional vascular access at the screening
  • Unipunction of the AVF
  • Patient treated by hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration procedure
  • Current anticoagulation treatment
  • Patient treated by digitalizing drugs
  • Patient treated by thiazide diuretics
  • Patient with hypercalcemia and/or hypercalciuria
  • History of sensitivity to heparin or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
  • Active hemorrhage
  • High bleeding risk defined by the following situations: recent bleeding of less than 7 days, recent post-operative period of less than 7 days, recent head trauma of less than 7 days, recent ischemic stroke of less than 7 days, uremic pericarditis.
  • Body weight \< 45 kg and \> 140 kg at screening.
  • Known allergy to citrate
  • Hospitalization at the screening for all other causes apart from dialysis
  • Moribund status (defined by the expectation of death in less than three months).
  • Liver failure (to prevent citrate liver toxicity) based on the results of the last monthly or quarterly blood test
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hôpital de la Conception

Marseille, Bouches du Rhône, 13885, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, Chronic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2024

First Posted

January 25, 2024

Study Start

June 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

October 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations