Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block Training Model and Evaluation Method
Standardized Assessment of Emergency Physician Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block Training Using a Low-fidelity Simulation Model
1 other identifier
interventional
86
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess emergency medicine physician knowledge and technical skill in performance of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior nerve block in a low-fidelity simulation model workshop and to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the training program. By performing this study, the investigators hope to create a standardized training model which could potentially facilitate POCUS and critical procedural performance and thereby improve patient care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 14, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 5, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2025
CompletedAugust 26, 2025
April 1, 2025
7 months
January 12, 2024
August 22, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Physician knowledge assessment
The investigators will assess ultrasound-guided serratus anterior nerve block in a simulation model using surveys at 1 month pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention (Likert scale 0-5 with values of Strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree)
4 months
Physician technical skills assessment
The investigators will assess ultrasound-guided serratus anterior nerve block in a simulation model using surveys at 1 month pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention (Likert scale 0-5 with values of Strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree).
4 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
acceptability of our implementation strategy
4 months
appropriateness of our implementation strategy
4 months
feasibility of our implementation strategy
4 months
Study Arms (1)
Emergency Medicine attending physicians and residents
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
workshop testing emergency physician knowledge and technical skills in performing ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in a simulation model
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Emergency medicine attending and resident physicians
You may not qualify if:
- ED nursing, ED technicians, and advanced practice physicians (APPs)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (2)
Petrosoniak A, Herold J, Woolfrey K. Emergency medicine procedural skills: what are residents missing? CJEM. 2013 Jul;15(4):241-8. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130897.
PMID: 23777999BACKGROUNDSherbino J, Bandiera G, Frank JR. Assessing competence in emergency medicine trainees: an overview of effective methodologies. CJEM. 2008 Jul;10(4):365-71. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500010381.
PMID: 18652729BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2024
First Posted
January 23, 2024
Study Start
November 14, 2024
Primary Completion
June 5, 2025
Study Completion
June 5, 2025
Last Updated
August 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All participant information will be confidential and restricted to the research study team. Deidentified summary data will be made available after study completion for public and scientific community dissemination and future clinical improvements.