Home Safety Intervention
HSI
Veteran-Centered Lethal Means Safety Suicide Prevention Intervention (CDA 19-076)
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Access to lethal methods of self-harm such as firearms and medications increases risk for suicide. As such, VA/DoD guidelines for the care of individuals with elevated suicide risk include recommendations that clinicians deliver interventions to reduce access to lethal methods of suicide among patients who are identified as having elevated suicide risk. However, no interventions have been developed or tested among Veterans with elevated suicide risk. The aim of this study is to pilot test a lethal means safety intervention developed specifically for Veterans who seek care in VHA clinical settings and are identified as having elevated suicide risk.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 18, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2026
CompletedAugust 28, 2026
August 1, 2026
9 months
December 20, 2023
June 30, 2026
August 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Feasibility: Number of Participants Recruited Within One Year
Ability to recruit 40 Veterans in one year. Count represents number of participants recruited within one year.
through study completion, an average of one year
Feasibility: Number of Participants Who Attend Their 4 Week Follow Up
\>80% of participants attend their 4 week follow up. Count represents number of participants who completed their 4 week follow up visit.
approximately 4 weeks
Acceptability: Number of Participants With CSQ Scores ≥24
\>80% with score greater than 23 (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8). 8 items, each with 4 answer options (1-4) on a Likert Scale. Likert options are different for each item. Score range is 8 to 32. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks
Acceptability: Number of Participants Who Reported the Intervention to be Acceptable
Count of participants who deemed the intervention acceptable via a qualitative evaluation of participant's experiences during the intervention. Assessed using the Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview (NEII): A 16-item semi-structured qualitative interview that helps participants evaluate the process and outcome of interventions.
at 4 weeks
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention Discussion to be Comfortable/Very Comfortable
Count represent the number of participants who reported feeling "Comfortable" or "Very comfortable". "How comfortable did you feel engaging in the discussion?" Likert responses: * Very uncomfortable * Uncomfortable * Neither * Comfortable * Very comfortable
day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Very Helpful/Extremely Helpful in Medication Storage Decisions
Count represent the number of participants who reported that their interaction was "Very helpful" or "Extremely helpful". "How helpful was your interaction in making decisions about medication storage and safety?" Likert responses: * Not at all * Slightly helpful * Moderately helpful * Very helpful * Extremely helpful
day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Very Helpful/Extremely Helpful in Firearm Storage Decisions
Count represent the number of participants who reported that their interaction was "Very helpful" or "Extremely helpful". "How helpful was your interaction in making decisions about firearm storage?" Likert responses: * Not at all * Slightly helpful * Moderately helpful * Very helpful * Extremely helpful
day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention to be Respectful/Very Respectful of Their Values as Firearm Owners
Count represents the number of participants who reported that their interaction was "Respectful" or "Very respectful". "To what extent was this intervention respectful of your values as a firearm owner? Likert responses: * Very disrespectful * Disrespectful * Neither * Respectful * Very respectful
day of intervention delivery - day 0; and at 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Average Participant Trust in the VA Healthcare System
Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Medication Storage When Someone is Suicidal
Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Medication Storage Always
Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Firearm Storage When Someone is Suicidal
Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks
Average Participant Beliefs About Importance of Secure Firearm Storage Always
Day of intervention delivery (day 0) and at 4 weeks
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALThere is a single intervention arm with no comparator for this pilot study.
Interventions
This intervention includes a household safety intervention that is delivered by an interventionist with specific training in facilitating lethal means safety discussions, and the provision of no-cost safety devices for medications and firearms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Encounter at VHA ED or urgent care setting, outpatient mental health, women's health, or primary care
- \>17 years
- Discharged home from the encounter (rather than hospital admission)
- Positive Columbia Screener
- Patient-reported access to self-owned firearms and/or medications
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to consent due to cognitive impairment, severity of illness (including psychiatric symptoms), intoxication with drugs and/or alcohol
- Unreliable telephone access
- Unreliable video access (because remote intervention)
- Those currently experiencing unsheltered homelessness
- No mailing address
- Active opioid or stimulant use disorder
- Active alcohol use disorder with daily alcohol consumption
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Aurora, Colorado, 80045-7211, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Joseph Simonetti
- Organization
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph A Simonetti, MD MPH
Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2023
First Posted
January 22, 2024
Study Start
October 8, 2024
Primary Completion
July 18, 2025
Study Completion
August 18, 2025
Last Updated
August 28, 2026
Results First Posted
August 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share