Autogenous Grafts for Anterior Maxillary Horizontal Ridge Augmentation

NCT06206577 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: A08040820
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 14
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of autogenous onlay and inlay grafts for anterior maxillary horizontal ridge augmentation.

Conditions

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Keywords

onlay grafting; inlay grafting

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• horizontal ridge augmentation

  CBCT to assess bone gain in mm

  12 months

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

Seven horizontal anterior maxillary ridge augmentation was done with symphyseal autogenous bone block, which was placed buccally as onlay graft.

Procedure: Horizontal ridge augmentation by symphyseal bone block placed and fixed buccally as onlay graft

Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

Seven horizontal anterior maxillary ridge augmentation was done with symphyseal autogenous bone block, which was interpositioned in space created between buccal and lingual cortex as inlay graft.

Procedure: Horizontal ridge augmentation by symphyseal bone block interpositioned in space created between buccal and lingual cortex as inlay graft

Interventions

Horizontal ridge augmentation by symphyseal bone block placed and fixed buccally as onlay graft PROCEDURE

autogenous bone block harvested from chin area using piezosurgery and fixed buccally in deficient area with fixation screws

Group A

Horizontal ridge augmentation by symphyseal bone block interpositioned in space created between buccal and lingual cortex as inlay graft PROCEDURE

autogenous bone block harvested from chin area using piezosurgery and fixed in bone split created at deficient area with fixation screws

Group B

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 50 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Patients with missing upper anterior tooth / teeth with horizontal ridge dimension range from 2 to 5 mm (measured 2mm below alveolar crest).
• Adequate vertical height.
• Having good oral hygiene.
• being healthy, with no systemic diseases that might contraindicate receiving a dental implant
• Patients were able to comply with the follow-up and maintenance program

You may not qualify if:

• Presence of local infection or lesions at site of interest.
• Dental history of bruxism, or other parafunctional habits.
• Uncooperative patients.
• Current chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
• Patients with aggressive periodontal disease

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Mansoura University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Mansoura U

Al Mansurah, Egypt

Location

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: TRIPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: assisstant lecturer of oral and maxillofacial surgery

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 20, 2023
• First Posted: January 16, 2024
• Study Start: September 1, 2020
• Primary Completion: September 15, 2022
• Study Completion: May 26, 2023
• Last Updated: January 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

EG (1)