NCT06206499

Brief Summary

Peri-implant mucositis is one of the most common peri-implant diseases. It was reported in more than 20% of the subjects rehabilitated with dental implants (Lee et al. 2017; Rodrigo et al. 2018; Wada et al. 2019). Furthermore, a significant association was found between peri-implant mucositis, and smoking, implant maintenance and peri-implant soft tissue characteristics (Wada et al. 2019). Soft tissue quality and volume of the peri-implant mucosa are considered important factors in the prognosis of osseointegrated implants. Linkevicius et al. showed that if its soft tissue thickness was less than 2 mm, crestal bone loss might occur (Linkevicius et al. 2009). In addition, when soft tissue width was evaluated, a wider soft tissue band was related to minimal bone remodeling (Linkevicius et al. 2015). Lin et al. reported in a systematic review and meta-analysis that a lack of keratinized tissue (KT) around osseintegrated implants was associated with plaque accumulation, peri-implant tissue inflammation, soft tissue recession and attachment loss (Lin et al. 2013). Moreover, recent studies established the need of a minimal band of 2 mm of KT around osseointegrated implants, and showed that a band less than 2 mm was associated with more brushing discomfort, plaque accumulation, tissue inflammation and marginal bone apical displacement, concluding that a KT\>2 mm had a protective effect on peri-implant tissues (Souza et al. 2015, Perussolo et al. 2018, Monje et al. 2019). Furthermore, peri-implant tissue diseases have also been related to an irregular compliance in situations of lack of KT (Monje et al. 2019). In the presence of peri-implant horizontal and/or vertical soft tissue deficiencias, soft tissue augmentation has been considered a priority, even prior or instead of bone augmentation (Burkhardt et al. 2008, Zucchelli et al. 2013).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 4, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 16, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 4, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 29, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 29, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 16, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 4, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 4, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in soft tissue 6months after procedure

    The amount of soft tissue gained in millimeters will be measured before and after

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Laterally Rotated Flap

EXPERIMENTAL

LRF, Moreno and Caffesse, 2016

Procedure: soft tissue augmentation

Free gingival graft

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

FGG, Sullivan and Atkins, 1968, Langer and Sullivan, 1989

Procedure: soft tissue augmentation

Interventions

Laterally Rotated Flap: A Split-thickness recipient bed on the buccal and mesial aspects of the implant was prepared, resulting in a firm attached bleeding area. The extension of the incisions towards the palate and the distance between them are dependent on the amount of keratinized tissue graft needed for each particular case. Habitually, the keratinized tissue is taken from the adjacent crest; however, if needed to displace more tissue, the incisions may be extended into the palatal tissue. The flap was prepared partial thickness, and released apically from the periosteum to allow passive displacement, and suturing without tension. It was latero-mesially displaced with a 90º rotation. The pedicle was sutured to the recipient bed. Control group: The surgical procedure followed the design proposed by Sullivans \& Atkins 1968 for soft tissue augmentation around teeth and modified by for application around oseointegrated dental implants.

Free gingival graftLaterally Rotated Flap

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • implant with soft tissue recession Plaque index score less than 30% No relevant systemic disease Smokers (Less than 20 cigars/day)

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy-Lactation Relevant systemic disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidad de Murcia

Murcia, 30009, Spain

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Periodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • JOSE ANTONIO MORENO RODRÍGUEZ, DDS

    UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCAI

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

MIGUEL RAMÓN P PECCI LLORET, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2024

First Posted

January 16, 2024

Study Start

April 4, 2024

Primary Completion

September 29, 2024

Study Completion

October 29, 2024

Last Updated

January 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Locations