Laterally Rotated Flap for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Maxillary Loaded Osseointegrated Dental Implant
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Peri-implant mucositis is one of the most common peri-implant diseases. It was reported in more than 20% of the subjects rehabilitated with dental implants (Lee et al. 2017; Rodrigo et al. 2018; Wada et al. 2019). Furthermore, a significant association was found between peri-implant mucositis, and smoking, implant maintenance and peri-implant soft tissue characteristics (Wada et al. 2019). Soft tissue quality and volume of the peri-implant mucosa are considered important factors in the prognosis of osseointegrated implants. Linkevicius et al. showed that if its soft tissue thickness was less than 2 mm, crestal bone loss might occur (Linkevicius et al. 2009). In addition, when soft tissue width was evaluated, a wider soft tissue band was related to minimal bone remodeling (Linkevicius et al. 2015). Lin et al. reported in a systematic review and meta-analysis that a lack of keratinized tissue (KT) around osseintegrated implants was associated with plaque accumulation, peri-implant tissue inflammation, soft tissue recession and attachment loss (Lin et al. 2013). Moreover, recent studies established the need of a minimal band of 2 mm of KT around osseointegrated implants, and showed that a band less than 2 mm was associated with more brushing discomfort, plaque accumulation, tissue inflammation and marginal bone apical displacement, concluding that a KT\>2 mm had a protective effect on peri-implant tissues (Souza et al. 2015, Perussolo et al. 2018, Monje et al. 2019). Furthermore, peri-implant tissue diseases have also been related to an irregular compliance in situations of lack of KT (Monje et al. 2019). In the presence of peri-implant horizontal and/or vertical soft tissue deficiencias, soft tissue augmentation has been considered a priority, even prior or instead of bone augmentation (Burkhardt et al. 2008, Zucchelli et al. 2013).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 29, 2024
CompletedJanuary 16, 2024
January 1, 2024
6 months
January 4, 2024
January 4, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in soft tissue 6months after procedure
The amount of soft tissue gained in millimeters will be measured before and after
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Laterally Rotated Flap
EXPERIMENTALLRF, Moreno and Caffesse, 2016
Free gingival graft
ACTIVE COMPARATORFGG, Sullivan and Atkins, 1968, Langer and Sullivan, 1989
Interventions
Laterally Rotated Flap: A Split-thickness recipient bed on the buccal and mesial aspects of the implant was prepared, resulting in a firm attached bleeding area. The extension of the incisions towards the palate and the distance between them are dependent on the amount of keratinized tissue graft needed for each particular case. Habitually, the keratinized tissue is taken from the adjacent crest; however, if needed to displace more tissue, the incisions may be extended into the palatal tissue. The flap was prepared partial thickness, and released apically from the periosteum to allow passive displacement, and suturing without tension. It was latero-mesially displaced with a 90º rotation. The pedicle was sutured to the recipient bed. Control group: The surgical procedure followed the design proposed by Sullivans \& Atkins 1968 for soft tissue augmentation around teeth and modified by for application around oseointegrated dental implants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- implant with soft tissue recession Plaque index score less than 30% No relevant systemic disease Smokers (Less than 20 cigars/day)
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy-Lactation Relevant systemic disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad de Murcia
Murcia, 30009, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
JOSE ANTONIO MORENO RODRÍGUEZ, DDS
UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCAI
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2024
First Posted
January 16, 2024
Study Start
April 4, 2024
Primary Completion
September 29, 2024
Study Completion
October 29, 2024
Last Updated
January 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01