NCT06203561

Brief Summary

This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trail involved tracheostomized patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage transferred to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of 4 hospitals in China between January 2023 to June 2023. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Tracheostomized Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. The main questions it aims to answer are: Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status, extubation of tracheostomy tube, pulmonary infection, neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer. Participants will be divided into two groups randomly, with different nutritional support respectively. .

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
118

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 17, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 5, 2023

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 12, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 12, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

January 2, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of cases of successful extubation

    The Number of cases of successful extubation for both groups was recorded and compared. The parameters or criteria for extubation were: 1) stable clinical condition and a respiratory rate of 12-22 breaths per minute. 2) strong coughing ability and minimal airway secretions. 3) after completing a trial of tracheostomy tube capping, patients showed no fever, dyspnea, or asthma within 72 hours. Additionally, their blood oxygen saturation remained above 95% and normal oxygen partial pressure was observed

    day 30

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Body mass index

    day 1 and day 30

  • Serum albumin

    day 1 and day 30

  • Hemoglobin

    day 1 and day 30

  • Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score

    day 1 and day 30

Study Arms (2)

The observation group

EXPERIMENTAL

The patients were provided with 1) basic treatment including intracranial pressure reduction, anti-infection therapy, blood pressure and blood glucose control, and 2) comprehensive rehabilitation therapy including respiratory tract management, care for tracheotomy tube, comprehensive training for hemiplegic limbs, swallowing function training, pulmonary function training, and acupuncture. For the observation group, the nasogastric tube was removed, and Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding was initiated for nutrition support within 4 hours after completing the admission assessment, following the standard Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding procedure.

Behavioral: Basic treatmentBehavioral: comprehensive rehabilitation therapyDevice: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding

The control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients were provided with 1) basic treatment including intracranial pressure reduction, anti-infection therapy, blood pressure and blood glucose control, and 2) comprehensive rehabilitation therapy including respiratory tract management, care for tracheotomy tube, comprehensive training for hemiplegic limbs, swallowing function training, pulmonary function training, and acupuncture. Patients in the control group were provided with nutrition support by the indwelling nasogastric tube. The entire feeding process strictly followed the standardized procedure for nasogastric feeding.

Behavioral: Basic treatmentBehavioral: comprehensive rehabilitation therapyDevice: Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Interventions

Basic treatmentBEHAVIORAL

including intracranial pressure reduction, anti-infection therapy, blood pressure and blood glucose control

The control groupThe observation group

including respiratory tract management, care for tracheotomy tube, comprehensive training for hemiplegic limbs, swallowing function training, pulmonary function training, and acupuncture.

The control groupThe observation group

The observation group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.

The observation group

The control group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube Feeding according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient\'s cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the patient\'s condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.

The control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • meeting the diagnostic criteria for Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
  • with placement of a tracheotomy tube.
  • requiring enteral nutrition support.
  • age over 18 years.
  • able to cooperate with treatment and questionnaire investigation, (Generally with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 24) .

You may not qualify if:

  • combined with tumors in the head, neck, esophagus, or gastrointestinal tract
  • an abnormal structure observed in the oral, pharyngeal, nasal regions or esophagus
  • with unstable vital signs or severe dysfunction of organs including heart, liver, lungs, or kidneys
  • with severe hemorrhagic disease or bleeding tendency; 5) with contraindications for enteral nutrition
  • with dysphagia caused by non-stroke-related reasons in the past

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zheng da yi fu yuan hospital

Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Hemorrhage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intracranial HemorrhagesCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Nieto Luis, Master

    Site Coordinator of United Medical Group located in Miami

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2024

First Posted

January 12, 2024

Study Start

January 17, 2023

Primary Completion

June 5, 2023

Study Completion

June 12, 2023

Last Updated

March 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations