Steroid-eluting Sinus Stent for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients With Uncontrolled Postoperative Symptoms
Study on the Efficacy of in Office Steroid-eluting Sinus Stent Implantation in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients With Uncontrolled Postoperative Symptoms
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stent-001 study is a randomized controlled clinical trial with the steroid-eluting Sinus in 96 chronic rhinosinusitis patients with uncontrolled postoperative symptoms
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 10, 2026
CompletedJanuary 18, 2024
January 1, 2024
2 years
December 27, 2023
January 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Scores (SNOT-22)
The change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores (SNOT-22) scores pre- and post-treatment between the two arms was measured. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test asks subjects to rate how "bad" their rhinosinusitis is by using a 0-5 point scale with 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem, 3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be. The SNOT includes 22 questions (symptoms and social/emotional consequences of rhinosinusitis), each of which are rated from 0 to 5 for a minimum score of 0 to maximum score of 110, with higher scores representing worse outcome.
Change from Baseline to Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Scores (SNOT-22)
Change from Baseline to Week 1, 2, 8, 12
Change in nasal symptoms
Change from Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Rescue medication use
Week 4 and Week 12
The rate of surgery rate
Week 4 and Week 12
Lund-Kennedy Scoring for Nasal Endoscopy
Change from Baseline to Week 1, 2, 4
Study Arms (2)
Steroid-eluting Sinus Implant
EXPERIMENTALIn-office bilateral placement of the sinus stent; Systemic glucocorticoid placebo; saline irrigations (250ml) twice daily
Control
SHAM COMPARATORIn-office bilateral sham procedure; Systemic glucocorticoid; saline irrigations (250ml) twice daily
Interventions
In-office bilateral placement of the steroid-eluting sinus stent in the ethmoid sinuses under local anesthesia
Groups were given oral methylprednisolone (32 mg/d on days 1-5; 16 mg/d on days 6-10; and 8 mg/d on days 11-20),
Patients were routinely treated with saline irrigations (250ml) twice daily
Groups were given systemic glucocorticoid placebo
The sham procedure was performed in-office under local anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient underwent pre-functional endoscopic sinus surgery and bilateral ethmoidectomy (for at least 3 months), and was identified by the clinician as having uncontrolled symptoms (Diagnostic criteria of EPOS 2020) with a Snot-22 score of at least 20;
- Edema score of bilateral nasal endoscopy was 2 points both;
- Understands the purpose and procedures of the trial and voluntarily signs the informed consent form;
- The female subjects had no pregnancy or lactation plans during the treatment and follow-up period;
- The subject has not participated in other clinical trials in the previous three months and agrees not to participate in other clinical trials until the end point of this trial was reached;
- Subjects were 18-65 years old, male or non-pregnant women;
You may not qualify if:
- Grade 2 or more nasal polyp scores in either nasal cavity (i.e., polyps extending beyond the middle nasal passage)
- The subject has a known allergic reaction or contraindication to the device material and its degradation products (mamethasone citrate, L-polylactic acid, racemic polylactic acid, lactide lactate, lactic acid);
- Subjects had cystic fibrosis, congenital ciliary dyskinesia, fungal globular sinusitis, systemic vasculitis and granulomatous diseases, tumors, and immune deficiency.
- The patient underwent endoscopic nasal surgery within 3 months.
- Acute exacerbation of allergic rhinitis, acute exacerbation of CRS, upper respiratory tract infection, or common cold in the 4 weeks prior to screening visit;
- Have a clinically serious metabolic, cardiovascular, immune, neurological, blood, digestive, cerebrovascular, or respiratory disease, or any condition that the investigator believes interferes with the evaluation of the study results or affects the safety of the subjects;
- Symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis, and/or, depending on the season, expected to develop symptoms and require nasal spray hormone therapy within 4 weeks of randomization,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zheng Liulead
Study Sites (1)
Department of ENT, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
Related Publications (2)
Forwith KD, Han JK, Stolovitzky JP, Yen DM, Chandra RK, Karanfilov B, Matheny KE, Stambaugh JW, Gawlicka AK. RESOLVE: bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants for in-office treatment of recurrent sinonasal polyposis after sinus surgery: 6-month outcomes from a randomized, controlled, blinded study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Jun;6(6):573-81. doi: 10.1002/alr.21741. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
PMID: 26992115BACKGROUNDVan Zele T, Gevaert P, Holtappels G, Beule A, Wormald PJ, Mayr S, Hens G, Hellings P, Ebbens FA, Fokkens W, Van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C. Oral steroids and doxycycline: two different approaches to treat nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 May;125(5):1069-1076.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.020.
PMID: 20451040BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants were blindfolded and earmuffed during the baseline procedure and follow-up endoscopic examinations. Implants were biodegradation at Week 4 to allow blinded assessment of bilateral edema score grade.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery; Deputy Dean of Tongji Medical College; Deputy Dean of Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2023
First Posted
January 10, 2024
Study Start
January 10, 2024
Primary Completion
January 10, 2026
Study Completion
April 10, 2026
Last Updated
January 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01