Hemodynamic Parameters Assessment; Invasive Versus Noninvasive

NCT06198621 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: cardiometry for hemodynamics
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 75
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

The study aims at evaluating effectiveness of noninvasive cardiometry in assessment of cardiac parameters in critically ill patients in respiratory ICU in comparison to invasive methods as indirect fick's and thermodilution methods using pulmonary artery catheter.

Conditions

Cardiac Output, Low

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Effectiveness of noninvasive cardiometry

  To know the effectiveness of noninvasive cardiometry - icon cardiometry - in determining patient's cardiac output and other hemodynamic parameters as stroke volume and cardiac index in comparison to invasive methods using swan ganz catheter as ficks method and thermodilution method. This will be done through computing sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of noninvasive cardiometry.

  1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Abnormal cardiac output in critically ill patients

  1 year

Interventions

cardiometry DEVICE

cardiometry is noninvasive method, while swan ganz is invasive method in hemodynamic parameters assessment

Also known as: pulmonary artery catheter (swan ganz)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Respiratory ICU patients

You may qualify if:

• Patients who are 18 years old or more.
• Critically ill patient in respiratory ICU unit with or without hemodynamic instability.

You may not qualify if:

• Presence of active infection at the site of insertion of PCA.
• Presence of coagulopathy or severe thrombocytopenia.
• Presence of cardiac arrhythmia or left bundle branch block.
• Newly inserted pacemaker of the heart.
• Lack of consent.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Assiut University: lead

Related Publications (4)

• Hett DA, Jonas MM. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2004 Apr;20(2):103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2004.01.002.

  PMID: 15072778 BACKGROUND

• Rodriguez Ziccardi M, Khalid N. Pulmonary Artery Catheterization. 2023 Aug 28. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482170/

  PMID: 29489212 BACKGROUND

• Evans DC, Doraiswamy VA, Prosciak MP, Silviera M, Seamon MJ, Rodriguez Funes V, Cipolla J, Wang CF, Kavuturu S, Torigian DA, Cook CH, Lindsey DE, Steinberg SM, Stawicki SP. Complications associated with pulmonary artery catheters: a comprehensive clinical review. Scand J Surg. 2009;98(4):199-208. doi: 10.1177/145749690909800402.

  PMID: 20218415 BACKGROUND

• Siebenmann C, Rasmussen P, Sorensen H, Zaar M, Hvidtfeldt M, Pichon A, Secher NH, Lundby C. Cardiac output during exercise: a comparison of four methods. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Feb;25(1):e20-7. doi: 10.1111/sms.12201. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

  PMID: 24646113 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Output, Low

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: OTHER
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assistant lecturer in pulmonolgy department

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 26, 2023
• First Posted: January 10, 2024
• Study Start: April 1, 2024
• Primary Completion: April 1, 2025
• Study Completion: June 1, 2025
• Last Updated: January 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01