NCT06193083

Brief Summary

Polymedication in palliative oncology care is a real public health problem. This phenomenon has been shown to increase the risk of iatrogenesis, reduce patients' quality of life and increase healthcare costs. For many years, health policies have been developed in geriatrics to reduce polymedication through deprescription tools. Recently, palliative care initiatives have been introduced, but without having studied the potential specificities of this population (younger, with a different care dynamic and life trajectory). It is important to better understand this population's perceptions of deprescribing in order to adapt tools/actions to make these approaches more efficient. The primary aim of this study is to investigate patients' perceptions of deprescribing in palliative cancer care, and the secondary aim is to investigate factors that may influence patients' attitudes and beliefs about deprescribing. At the same time, we will study the psychometric properties of the rPATD (Revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing) in this population (a standardized questionnaire validated in geriatric medicine to assess patients' perceptions of deprescription).An ancillary study will be carried out to investigate the link between patients' health literacy and their perception of deprescribing (health literacy is defined as the ability to acquire, understand and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health). To meet our objectives, we will conduct a 3-year national, prospective, observational, multicenter study with an exploratory sequential mixed design. The study will comprise an initial qualitative phase. Semi-directed individual interviews using a descriptive approach will be carried out (around 25 patients, over an 8-month period). Following analysis of the qualitative data, we will then carry out a quantitative study to determine the distribution of the different profiles within this population and the factors influencing the perception of deprescription. The self-administered questionnaires, rPATD and BMQ (medication beliefs questionnaire), potentially supplemented by other items following analysis of the qualitative data, will be administered to 300 patients (over a 12-month period).The ancillary study will be carried out during this second phase, using a validated self-questionnaire to assess patients' level of literacy. Thanks to the different results, we will improve our knowledge of the perception of deprescription in palliative oncology care, in order to develop approaches adapted to the specificities of our population to reduce polymedication and thus improve the quality of life of our patients and reduce the risks of iatrogenia.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
325

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
8mo left

Started Feb 2024

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress77%
Feb 2024Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 21, 2023

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 5, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 28, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2025

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 29, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

February 11, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 21, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

DeprescribingPalliative careOncology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To study patients' perceptions of deprescribing in palliative cancer care.

    To describe, understand and explain patients' attitudes and beliefs concerning deprescribing by means of individual semi-structured interviews (descriptive approach methodology with reflexive thematic analysis) and secondly using the rPATD questionnaire (questionnaire for assessing patients' perceptions of their treatments and deprescribing), which can be adapted following analysis of qualitative data. rPATD: The rPATD is a questionnaire validated and adapted in French to assess patients' perceptions of their treatments and deprescribing. This self-administered questionnaire consists of 22 questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale

    at study inclusion

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • To investigate factors that may influence patients' attitudes and beliefs regarding de-prescribing.

    at study inclusion

  • To evaluate the psychometric properties of the rPATD in this population.

    at study inclusion

Other Outcomes (1)

  • ANCILLARY STUDY

    at study inclusion

Study Arms (2)

Qualitative study

The study will comprise an initial qualitative phase. Semi-directed individual interviews using a descriptive approach will be carried out (around 25 patients, over an 8-month period).

Other: Semi-directed individual interviews

Quantitative study

Following analysis of the qualitative data, we will then carry out a quantitative study to determine the distribution of the different profiles within this population and the factors influencing the perception of deprescription. The self-administered questionnaires, rPATD and BMQ (medication beliefs questionnaire), potentially supplemented by other items following analysis of the qualitative data, will be administered to 300 patients (over a 12-month period). The ancillary study will be carried out during this second phase, using a validated self-questionnaire to assess patients' level of literacy.

Other: The self-administered questionnaires, rPATD and BMQOther: The self-administered FCCHL (Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy) / HLS14 (14-item health literacy scale)

Interventions

Individual semi-structured interviews (descriptive approach methodology with reflexive thematic analysis)

Qualitative study

rPATD: The rPATD is a questionnaire validated and adapted in French to assess patients' perceptions of their treatments and deprescribing. This self-administered questionnaire consists of 22 questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale (scale from 1 to 5, at 1 the patient completely agrees with the questionnaire's proposal, at 5 the patient strongly disagrees with the questionnaire's proposal). Following the analysis of Phase 1 "Qualitative" of the protocol, three additional questions BMQ French version of the BMQ self-questionnaire, which studies patients' perceptions of medication . The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) is an 18-item self-administered questionnaire designed to explore patient perceptions of medicine. It has been validated in French and is free to use. It comprises 10 items relating to specific beliefs about prescribed treatments: A 5-point Likert-type scale was used for each item. The higher the sum of the scores obtained, the stronger the subject's belief.

Quantitative study

FCCHL (Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy)/HLS14 (14-item health literacy scale) (https://reflis.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FCCHL-HLS14-Questionnaire-Litteratie-sante.pdf ) Validated French-language self-administered questionnaire and consisting of14 items with a 5-point Likert scale for assessing health literacy : Functional literacy: basic reading and writing skills sufficient to function effectively in everyday situations Communicative or interactive literacy: more advanced cognitive and literacy skills that, combined with social skills, can be used to actively participate in everyday activities, extract information and meanings from different forms of communication, and apply new information to changing circumstances Critical literacy: more advanced cognitive skills which, combined with social skills, can be applied to the critical analysis of information and the use of that information to exercise greater control over life events and situations

Quantitative study

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

We'll be looking at major patients with "solid" cancer in a palliative situation (locally advanced or metastatic cancer, thus requiring palliative care as defined by the World Health Organization), who have at least one PIMs, followed up on an inpatient or outpatient basis, with a life expectancy estimated at less than 1 year by the doctor caring for the patient. To identify whether a patient has at least one PIMs, we will use the STOPPFrail 2 tool . This is a tool developed in geriatrics, validated for a population with an estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year, and which is not specific to oncology. Life expectancy of less than one year will be estimated by the question surprised by the doctor caring for the patient ("Would you be surprised if your patient died within a year?") . We will carry out a multicenter study in oncology and/or palliative care departments of hospitals located in western France.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient over 18 years of age
  • Locally advanced or metastatic solid cancer (i.e., palliative care as defined by the World Health Organization)
  • Hospitalized or in consultation
  • With at least one PIMs (identified using STOPPfrail 2)
  • Patient not having expressed opposition to participating in the study after receiving information from the physician.
  • For qualitative study patients :
  • \- Patients who have signed an authorization for the recording of their voice during the semi-structured interview for the purpose of written transcription.

You may not qualify if:

  • Minor
  • Major under guardianship, protected person
  • Patient unable to speak or write French
  • Patient with impaired judgment, cognitive or sensory impairment that prevents him/her from receiving informed information, answering questionnaires or participating in a study interview.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

CHD Vendée

La Roche-sur-Yon, 85000, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

CHU de Nantes

Nantes, 44093, France

RECRUITING

USP - Maison de Nicodème

Nantes, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

Hôpital Institut CURIE

Paris, 75005, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

Saint-Herblain, 44800, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

CH ST Nazaire

Saint-Nazaire, 44600, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

CHRU Tours

Tours, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Evin A, Bourdon M, Nizet P, Hardouin JB, Victorri-Vigneau C, Huon JF. DEprescribing: Perceptions of PAtients living with advanced cancer. A multicentre, prospective mixed observational study protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0305737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305737. eCollection 2024.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Interventions

Functional Status

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Activities of Daily LivingRehabilitationHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesHealth StatusDemographyEpidemiologic MeasurementsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Adrien EVIN

    Nantes University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Adrien EVIN, MCU-PH

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2023

First Posted

January 5, 2024

Study Start

February 28, 2024

Primary Completion

February 28, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 29, 2026

Last Updated

February 11, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations