Efficacy of Whole-body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) Training in Participants With Pre-diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot study is to assess the efficacy of the intervention (WB-EMS Training) in a sedentary group of adults with pre-diabetes and to estimate the potential effect sizes. The main goals and questions it aims to answer are:
- Efficacy WB-EMS training in sedentary adults with pre-diabetes,
- Has WB-EMS training positive effects on HbA1c and other biomarkers? Researchers will compare the intervention group with two control groups to see if WB-EMS training has effects on pre-diabetes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 3, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 17, 2025
CompletedDecember 24, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.9 years
December 7, 2023
December 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in HbA1c in %
Assessed via blood sample with finger stick technique
Baseline, after 16 weeks of intervention and follow-up after 32 weeks (only intervention group)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change from baseline in lipid profile in mg/dL
Baseline, after 16 weeks of intervention and follow-up after 32 weeks (only intervention group)
Change from baseline in waist circumference in cm
Baseline, after 16 weeks of intervention and follow-up after 32 weeks (only intervention group)
Change from baseline in body composition
Baseline, after 16 weeks of intervention and after follow-up 32 weeks (only intervention group)
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms
Baseline, after 16 weeks of intervention and follow-up after 32 weeks (only intervention group)
Change from baseline in health-related quality of life
Baseline, after 16 weeks of intervention and follow-up after 32 weeks (only intervention group)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Intervention group with WB-EMS Training
OTHERThe Intervention group receives 1.5 times a week WB-EMS training, wears an activity tracker for 16 weeks and completes 6 sessions of an evidence-based lifestyle education program.
Control group with activity tracker and evidence-based lifestyle education program
OTHERThe control group wears an activity tracker for 16 weeks and completes 6 sessions of an evidence-based lifestyle education program.
Control group with evidence-based lifestyle education program
OTHERThe control group completes 6 sessions of an evidence-based lifestyle education program.
Interventions
Participants receive an evidence-based lifestyle education programme (6 x 20 minutes for the period of 3 month).
The duration of the intervention is 16 weeks, the training frequency is 1.5 times a week and the exercise program consists of 20 minutes.
Participants wear the activity tracker on their wrist for the entire 16-week study period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- community-dwelling sedentary (\<20 min physical activity on \<3 days/week) men and women aged 40-65 years without Diabetes Type 2
- elevated HbA1c levels (5.7%-6.4%),
- not functionally impaired (Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) ≥10)
- signed informed consent
- consent to use the WB-EMS and activity tracker
You may not qualify if:
- high-grade arrhythmia/VHF/SM carriers, heart failure \>NYHA2, nephropathy (GFR\<60),
- cognitive impairment
- Diabetes Type 2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Tübingen
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076, Germany
Related Publications (14)
Hoshiai M, Ochiai K, Tamura Y, Tsurumi T, Terashima M, Tamiya H, Maeno E, Mizuguchi S, Tomoe T, Kawabe A, Uema A, Ueno A, Sugiyama T, Horie Y, Sugimura H, Koike R, Yasu T. Effects of whole-body neuromuscular electrical stimulation device on hemodynamics, arrhythmia, and sublingual microcirculation. Heart Vessels. 2021 Jun;36(6):844-852. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01755-1. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
PMID: 33547929BACKGROUNDWatanabe K, Yoshida T, Ishikawa T, Kawade S, Moritani T. Effect of the Combination of Whole-Body Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Voluntary Exercise on Metabolic Responses in Human. Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 20;10:291. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00291. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30949069BACKGROUNDKemmler W, Weissenfels A, Willert S, Shojaa M, von Stengel S, Filipovic A, Kleinoder H, Berger J, Frohlich M. Efficacy and Safety of Low Frequency Whole-Body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) to Improve Health-Related Outcomes in Non-athletic Adults. A Systematic Review. Front Physiol. 2018 May 23;9:573. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00573. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29875684BACKGROUNDKemmler W, von Stengel S, Kohl M, Rohleder N, Bertsch T, Sieber CC, Freiberger E, Kob R. Safety of a Combined WB-EMS and High-Protein Diet Intervention in Sarcopenic Obese Elderly Men. Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jun 24;15:953-967. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S248868. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32612355BACKGROUNDKemmler W, Bebenek M, Engelke K, von Stengel S. Impact of whole-body electromyostimulation on body composition in elderly women at risk for sarcopenia: the Training and ElectroStimulation Trial (TEST-III). Age (Dordr). 2014 Feb;36(1):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9575-2. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
PMID: 23949160BACKGROUNDKemmler W, Kohl M, Freiberger E, Sieber C, von Stengel S. Effect of whole-body electromyostimulation and / or protein supplementation on obesity and cardiometabolic risk in older men with sarcopenic obesity: the randomized controlled FranSO trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0759-6.
PMID: 29523089BACKGROUNDKemmler W, von Stengel S. Whole-body electromyostimulation as a means to impact muscle mass and abdominal body fat in lean, sedentary, older female adults: subanalysis of the TEST-III trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1353-64. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S52337. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
PMID: 24130433BACKGROUNDvan Buuren F, Horstkotte D, Mellwig KP, Frund A, Vlachojannis M, Bogunovic N, Dimitriadis Z, Vortherms J, Humphrey R, Niebauer J. Electrical Myostimulation (EMS) Improves Glucose Metabolism and Oxygen Uptake in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients--Results from the EMS Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Jun;17(6):413-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0315. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
PMID: 25734937BACKGROUNDMiyamoto T, Fukuda K, Kimura T, Matsubara Y, Tsuda K, Moritani T. Effect of percutaneous electrical muscle stimulation on postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;96(3):306-12. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
PMID: 22296854BACKGROUNDMiyamoto T, Iwakura T, Matsuoka N, Iwamoto M, Takenaka M, Akamatsu Y, Moritani T. Impact of prolonged neuromuscular electrical stimulation on metabolic profile and cognition-related blood parameters in type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled cross-over trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;142:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.05.032. Epub 2018 May 24.
PMID: 29802953BACKGROUNDCoughlin SS, Stewart J. Use of Consumer Wearable Devices to Promote Physical Activity: A Review of Health Intervention Studies. J Environ Health Sci. 2016 Nov;2(6):10.15436/2378-6841.16.1123. doi: 10.15436/2378-6841.16.1123. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
PMID: 28428979BACKGROUNDLeskinen T, Suorsa K, Tuominen M, Pulakka A, Pentti J, Loyttyniemi E, Heinonen I, Vahtera J, Stenholm S. The Effect of Consumer-based Activity Tracker Intervention on Physical Activity among Recent Retirees-An RCT Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Aug 1;53(8):1756-1765. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002627.
PMID: 34261997BACKGROUNDEllingson LD, Lansing JE, DeShaw KJ, Peyer KL, Bai Y, Perez M, Phillips LA, Welk GJ. Evaluating Motivational Interviewing and Habit Formation to Enhance the Effect of Activity Trackers on Healthy Adults' Activity Levels: Randomized Intervention. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 14;7(2):e10988. doi: 10.2196/10988.
PMID: 30762582BACKGROUNDShojaa M, Knaub K, Schmitz N, Niess AM, Munz B, Rau S, Feit V, Mphepo W, Dingler R, Kemmler W. Effect of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training on Glycemic Control in People With Prediabetes: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 24;14:e68761. doi: 10.2196/68761.
PMID: 40554784DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mahdieh Shojaa, Dr.
University Hospital Tuebingen/ Institute of Health Sciences/ Population-Based Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2023
First Posted
January 3, 2024
Study Start
January 23, 2024
Primary Completion
December 17, 2025
Study Completion
December 17, 2025
Last Updated
December 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share