Feasibility Test of Action Planning in Pediatric IBD
Feasibility of a Care Team-Focused Action Plan to Improve Quality of Care for Children and Adolescents With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this interventional study is to test the feasibility of a new communication tool, call MyIBD, in youth ages 13 to 19 years with inflammatory bowel disease. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
- Is the MyIBD communication tool feasible to use in everyday clinical practice?
- Does the MyIBD tool have potential to improve patients' self-management skills and the quality of care they receive? Participants who receive the MyIBD intervention will complete surveys about their care at three times points - at study enrollment, at 6 months, and at 12 months. The surveys will help the research team learn about the feasibility of using MyIBD in practice and about any effects on patients' self-management skills and quality of care. Researchers will compare those receiving a MyIBD document to a randomly selected control group (patients receiving usual care for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease) to see if self-management skills and quality of care differ between the groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedMay 8, 2025
April 1, 2025
2.1 years
December 15, 2023
May 5, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Number of overall participants recruited and randomized
Number (0-60) will be an indicator of feasibility of implementing MyIBD in practice.
Measured and reported at the end of study year 1
Number of intervention group participants who receive a MyIBD document
Number (0-30) of intervention-group participants who receive a MyIBD document will estimate the degree of completion of the intervention in practice.
Measured and reported at the end of study year 1
Number of overall participants retained through baseline survey
Number (0-60) of participants who complete the baseline survey
Measured and reported at the end of study year 1
Number of overall participants retained through 6-month survey
Number (0-60) of participants who complete the 6-month survey
Measured and reported at the mid-point of study year 2
Number of overall participants retained through 12-month survey
Number (0-60) of participants who complete the 12-month survey
Measured and reported at end of study year 2
Number of control group participants who receive a MyIBD document
Number (0-30) of control-group participants who (inappropriately) receive a MyIBD document is an indicator of contamination, or spreading the intervention in practice to the control group.
Measured and reported at the end of study year 1
Number of intervention group participants who agree or completely agree that MyIBD is an acceptable intervention using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Measured in the 12-month participant survey using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), a four-item scale with five Likert-type response options from 1=Completely disagree to 5=Completely agree. Item scores are averaged to yield a scale score, with 1 indicating the lowest level of acceptability and 5 indicating the highest level.
Reported at the end of study year 2
Number of intervention group participants who agree or completely agree that MyIBD is an appropriate intervention using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Measured in the 12-month participant survey using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), a four-item scale with five Likert-type response options from 1=Completely disagree to 5=Completely agree. Item scores are averaged to yield a scale score, with 1 indicating the lowest level of appropriateness and 5 indicating the highest level.
Reported at the end of study year 2
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean self-management score on the Partners in Health scale at baseline
Measured in each participant's baseline survey; reported at end of study year 1
Mean self-management score on the Partners in Health scale at 6 months
Measured in each participant's 6-month survey; reported at end of study year 2
Mean self-management score on the Partners in Health scale at 12 months
Measured in each participant's 12-month survey; reported at end of study year 2
Mean perceived Quality of Care score at baseline using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care survey
Measured in each participant's baseline survey; reported at end of study year 1
Mean perceived Quality of Care score at 12 months using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care survey
Measured in each participant's 12-month survey; reported at end of study year 2
Other Outcomes (8)
Number of overall participants who completed a primary care health supervision visit in the past year, baseline
Measured by self-report in baseline survey; reported at end of study year 1
Number of overall participants who completed a primary care health supervision visit in the past year, 12 months
Measured by self-report in 12-month survey; reported at end of study year 2
Number of overall participants who completed special vaccine recommendations, baseline
Measured by self-report in baseline survey; reported at end of study year 1
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MyIBD
EXPERIMENTALEach participant randomized to the intervention arm (MyIBD) will receive an individually tailored MyIBD document within a week of a scheduled outpatient clinic visit. The MyIBD document will be prepared by the patient's usual, assigned nurse coordinator together with the study's clinical champion (a nurse practitioner in the IBD program). Participants will receive a copy of the MyIBD document with language suggesting that they use it to guide decisions about care in between appointments. Each participant's primary care provider will also receive a copy of the MyIBD document. The nurse coordinator will send reminder messages to intervention-group participants (using the electronic patient portal) to access and use their MyIBD document at 1-2 months, 3-4 months, 7-8 months, and 11-12 months after initial plan creation.
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONEach participant randomized to the control group will receive usual care in the pediatric IBD program. They will be eligible to receive a MyIBD document after completing the study (12 months after enrollment).
Interventions
MyIBD has two components: (1) an electronic, templated document that presents brief, actionable, tailored guidance from IBD specialists to families and other providers who care for a pediatric patient with IBD; and (2) regular, short prompts sent through the electronic patient portal to remind patients to refer to and use their MyIBD document to guide decisions about care in between appointments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 13-19 years old at time of recruitment; AND
- diagnosis at least 3 months earlier of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or indeterminate colitis (to exclude families who have not had sufficient time to become familiar with condition and/or clinic personnel); AND
- receiving ongoing care at UNC (at least one visit in the past year)
You may not qualify if:
- speaker of a language other than English or Spanish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill School of Medicine
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Neal deJong, MD
UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The research assistant in charge of sending out electronic surveys for data collection will be masked to participants' group allocation.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2023
First Posted
January 2, 2024
Study Start
February 5, 2024
Primary Completion
March 1, 2026
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- The data will become 9 to 36 months following publication and will remain available as long as the principal investigator remains actively working.
- Access Criteria
- See Plan Description section above for IRB or similar authorization prior to access. Once those criteria have been met, an interested investigator may contact the study PI by email (dejong@med.unc.edu); the PI would arrange for deidentified data sharing in accordance with university policy.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.