NCT06186011

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare Quality of Life and cosmetic outcomes in Breast Conservative Carcer surgery depending on localization method (intraoperative Ultrasound, wire and radioactive seed). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three proposed arms, and the primary surgery will be performed.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 4, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 29, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 29, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 15, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Quality of LifeCosmetic outcomes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • BCCT.core

    BCCT.core is a semi-automatic software validated for the assessment of cosmetic outcomes following BCS. It provides an objective measure and has been demonstrated to correlate well to a panel of experts. BCCT.core analyses several parameters including symmetry, skin colour and scar visibility to evaluate breast cosmesis, and classifies the overall cosmetic result into four classes: Excellent, Good, Fair and Poor. However, BCCT.core does not incorporate patient self-perception of outcome and does not directly assess the volume of breast excised. Standardized clinical photographs were taken 1-year post-surgery with or without radiotherapy, as recommended by the BCCT.core software developers and assessed at the end of the data collection period by a single investigator, blinded to the identification and treatment group of the participant.

    12 months after surgery

  • BREAST-Q questionnaire

    The BREAST-Q questionnaire is a specific and validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) for patients undergoing breast surgery designed to assess the outcomes and satisfaction of individuals, which measures health-related QoL (physical well-being, psychological and sexual) and satisfaction (satisfaction with the breast, satisfaction with the overall result and satisfaction with the care received). Each scale is scored to generate a numeric score on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). These measures were studied at baseline (preoperative) and 12 months post-surgery.

    preoperative, 12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Excess volume resection

    Inmediatly after surgery

  • Margin status

    Inmediatly after surgery

  • Ampliations

    Inmediatly after surgery

  • Additional treatment interventions

    3 weeks and 12 months after surgery

  • Excision time

    Inmediatly after surgery

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Wire-guided

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Wire guided localization (WGL) is considered the standard method for intraoperative localization of non-palpable breast lesions, chosen by many centers worldwide. It involves the placement of a wire or barbed needle that is percutaneously introduced into the lesion using a guide. It is cost-effective, easy to place guided by ultrasound or stereotaxis, allows for repositioning in case of error, and its safety and efficacy have been widely demonstrated in the literature.

Procedure: Wire-guided surgery

Intraoperative Ultrasound

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is an effective method that is controlled by the surgeon and does not require the involvement of other departments or preoperative invasive procedures. IOUS has been introduced into clinical practice as a tool for visualizing non-palpable tumors, demonstrating the detection of nearly 100% of lesions, and a rate of negative margins and re-excision similar to WGL. One of the challenges of the technique in ultrasound-guided surgery arises when the tumor is \<5mm, making it difficult to visualize by ultrasound, or when there are microcalcifications not visible by ultrasound.

Procedure: Intraoperative ultrasound localization

Radioactive seed

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Radioactive seeds are composed of a titanium capsule with an I-125 filament inside. They have low radioactivity, which can range from 7 to 200 μCi. During surgery, the seeds are detected using a portable gamma ray detection probe typically used for sentinel lymph node biopsy, configured to detect an I-125 source (27 keV). This probe has a wide detection range through tissue (\>10 cm), currently offering the greatest detection range compared to other available localization devices. Radioactive seed localization (RSL) require coordination between the radiology and nuclear medicine departments for marking. The results in terms of lesion localization and margin involvement rates are comparable to WGL.

Procedure: Radioactive seed localization

Interventions

If assigned to the WGS, the marking will be performed by the radiologist on the day prior to the intervention.

Wire-guided

If assigned to the RSL, the marking will be performed by the radiologist on the day prior to the intervention. The handling and traceability will be done by the nuclear medicine physician.

Radioactive seed

If the patient is assigned to the Intraoperative ultrasound localization (IOUS), no further procedures will be necessary until surgery. Subsenquently, the primary surgery will be performed.

Intraoperative Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with non-palpable and ecovisible infiltrating breast carcinoma, classified as T1 and T2, eligible for primary breast-conserving surgery (BCS)

You may not qualify if:

  • lesions \<5mm
  • multicentric tumors
  • extensive calcifications not visible by ultrasound
  • level III oncoplastic techniques or mastectomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Clínic de Barcelona

Barcelona, 08036, Spain

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Eduard Mension, MD PhD

    Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Eduard Mension, MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Single-center parallel randomized Clinical Trial with three arms: intraoperative Ultrasound vs. wire vs. radioactive seed
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2023

First Posted

December 29, 2023

Study Start

October 4, 2023

Primary Completion

October 1, 2025

Study Completion

October 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 29, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations