Effectiveness and Safety of Using Prontosan to Treat Bacterial Biofilm
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Prontosan wound irrigation solution comparing with Normal Saline on the removal of wound bacterial biofilm through observing the morphological characteristics and development of bacterial biofilm in chronic wound patients with secondary infections. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B
- Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B .
- Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups.
- 4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups.
- Wound healing rate
- Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score.
- Distribution of inflammatory cells on the wound.
- Detection rate of bacteria/drug-resistant bacteria on the wound and their correlation with the detection rate of bacterial biofilm. Participants will be randomized to experimental group or Control group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution or normal saline will be extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution or normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 3, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2025
CompletedFebruary 23, 2024
February 1, 2024
2 months
November 21, 2023
February 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B
Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm=the total score of 3 tissues before treatment- the total score of 3 tissues treatment after 7days. To compare the score difference between 2 groups after the difference is calculated.
Day0, Day7
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B
Day0, Day3
Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups
Day0, Day3,Day7
4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups
Day0, Day3,Day7
Wound healing rate
Day0, Day3,Day7
Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score
Day0, Day3,Day7
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution rinse
EXPERIMENTALThe test group is selected according to the randomization number of enrollment. For experimental group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution is extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
Normal Saline rinse
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor control group, Normal saline is extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
Interventions
After debridement surgery, the test group is selected according to the randomization number of enrollment. For experimental group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution is extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
After debridement surgery, the test group is selected according to the randomization number of enrollment. For control group, normal saline is extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Voluntarily sign the informed consent form;
- \. ≥18 years old;
- \. Patients with chronic wound, eg. burns, and pressure injuries with stage 3 and 4. Diabetes foot ulcer with Wagner grade 2; (Staging and Wagner grading of stress injury can be found in attachments 1 and 2);
- \. The length and width of a single wound in the wound area where the sampling point is located must be ≥2 cm, and the maximum length and width must be ≤10 cm;
- \. The rapid smear test results of bacteria on the wound were positive;
- \. The clinical symptoms of wound infection meet the following conditions: skin infection level scale score (SIRS) ≥ 8;
- \. Patients identified by the investigator as having biofilm formation on the wound;
- \. No eschar covering the wound surface.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Patients administered with systemic antibiotics 48 hours before enrollment;
- \. Patients with severe autoimmune diseases;
- \. Patients with pressure injuries classified as Stage I and II; (Please refer to Attachment 1 for for pressure injury staging);
- \. Diabetes foot ulcer with Wagner grade0- 1 and more than 3; (Wagner grading of stress injury can be found in attachments 2);
- \. Female in pregnancy or lactation period;
- \. Those who have participated in clinical trials of drugs or devices within one month before the first treatment;
- \. Patients who are allergic to any component of the research device;
- \. Those who are currently using tumor chemotherapy drugs during screening;
- \. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase the risk to the subjects or otherwise affect the evaluation of efficacy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The First Hospital of Jilin Universitylead
- Shenzhen Second People's Hospitalcollaborator
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, China
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jia'ao Yu, Professor
The First Hospital of Jilin University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jun Wu, Professor
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zhaohong Chen, Professor
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2023
First Posted
December 29, 2023
Study Start
January 3, 2024
Primary Completion
February 21, 2024
Study Completion
February 28, 2025
Last Updated
February 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Not share.