Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Vital Primary Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomised controlled trial aims to compare treatment outcomes between pulpotomy and pulpectomy when used to treat vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Compared to the standard pulpectomy treatment, pulpotomy is a technically simpler procedure, less time consuming, easier for young patients to tolerate, while retaining the proprioceptive sensation of the tooth - all important advantages when treating young children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
February 6, 2024
February 1, 2024
3.4 years
December 13, 2023
February 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Outcome
Clinical outcome success will be determined at 6-, 12-, and 24-months based on the treated tooth meeting all the below criteria: * Treated tooth is not associated with any pain or discomfort * Treated tooth is not associated with tenderness on percussion or palpation * Treated tooth is not associated with any swelling, parulis, or fistula * Treated tooth is not associated with any pathological mobility
6 months; 12 months; 24 months
Radiographic Outcome
Radiographic outcome success will be determined at 6-, 12-, and 24-months based on the pulpotomy treated tooth meeting all the below criteria: * No signs of pathological internal/external root resorption or new furcal/periapical lesions on recall periapical radiographs * Complete radiographic healing or reduction/no change in size of any pre-treatment furcal rarefaction on recall periapical radiographs
6 months; 12 months; 24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Immediate post-treatment pain relief
24 hours; 7 day
Study Arms (2)
Pulpotomy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in vital primary molars will receive the pulpotomy treatment intervention.
Pulpectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in vital primary molars will receive the pulpectomy treatment intervention.
Interventions
Pulpotomy is a conservative pulp treatment option where only the coronal pulp is removed and a bioactive medicament (MTA) is placed over the remnant radicular pulp after haemostasis is achieved.
Pulpectomy is treatment procedure in primary teeth where the entire coronal and radicular pulp is extirpated and the root canal system filled with a resorbable material (Endoflas)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy (ASA I and II) co-operative children (Frankl Scale + and ++) between the ages of four and nine years.
- Participants have symptoms typical of irreversible pulpitis in one of the primary molars.
- The pulp of the affected primary molar is vital.
- Radicular pulp health is confirmed by attainment of radicular pulp haemostasis within 8 minutes of coronal pulp amputation.
- The affected primary molars can be restored with full coverage crowns.
- Any physiologic root resorption, if present, is less than ⅓ the root length
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical examination of affected primary molar reveals signs of pulpal infection (e.g.
- pathologic tooth mobility, parulis/fistula, or soft tissue swelling)
- Pre-operative periapical radiograph suggests presence of periapical radiolucency.
- Pre-operative periapical radiograph suggests presence of furcal radiolucency more than ½ the furcation to periapical area.
- Visual examination of pulp tissue after deroofing reveals signs of necrosis (e.g. avascular/minimally bleeding pulp tissue or yellowish necrotic areas/purulent exudate).
- Signs of extensive radicular pulp inflammation.
- Parents not willing to place full coverage crowns post-treatment.
- Clinical diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis between two primary molars is not sharply defined
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nebu Philiplead
- Christian Dental Collegecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Christian Dental College
Ludhiana, Punjab, 141008, India
Related Publications (1)
Philip N, Cherian JM, Mathew MG, Thomas AM, Jodhka S, John N, Suneja B, Duggal M. Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 28;24(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04411-6.
PMID: 38807160DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bharat Suneja, MDS
The Dental Care Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nebu Philip, PhD
Qatar University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2023
First Posted
December 27, 2023
Study Start
February 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
February 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share