Sirolimus Coated BALloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in The Treatment of Below The Knee Arterial Disease
MAGICAL BTK
MAGICAL BTK: Randomized Controlled Trial of MAGIcTouch - Sirolimus Coated BALloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in The Treatment of Below The Knee Arterial Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
368
1 country
29
Brief Summary
This is a Pivotal, Prospective, randomized, two arm, placebo controlled, single-blind, multicenter trial that will be conducted at approximately 80 sites; approx. 50 sites with at least 50% of subjects will be recruited from USA and approx. 30 sites OUS - Europe, Australia and Asia. Each site will be capped at 30 maximum subjects recruited. The main goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus drug coated balloon (DCB) versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of below the knee arterial disease. Eligible subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 allocation ratio and stratified by recruiting countries. Each subject will be randomized to receive either:
- 1.MagicTouch PTA sirolimus coated balloon catheter (DCB) in addition to standard balloon angioplasty or
- 2.Placebo balloon angioplasty in addition to standard balloon angioplasty (PTA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2031
January 2, 2026
December 1, 2025
1.9 years
December 4, 2023
December 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary patency at 12 months defined as freedom from Target Vessel Occlusion, Binary Restenosis, Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization and Major Amputation.
Binary restenosis will be defined as the proportion of subjects with duplex ultrasonography-derived peak systolic velocity ratio of \> 2.0 with correlating factors. If the PSV at the reference area in the vessel is abnormal, the core laboratory will employ the following other criteria to diagnose a stenosis of \> 50%: * Monophasic/ low resistive waveforms (parvus tardus) at the stenotic area or distal to an acoustic shadow * Post-stenotic turbulence distal to the stenosis, along with a decrease in peak systolic velocities Gray scale/ B-mode imaging demonstrates significant plaque with stenosis along with a focal increase in the absolute PSV value. * Occlusion = Absence of color filling and spectral Doppler signal.
12 months
Composite safety endpoint
Proportion of subjects who experienced any of the following: 1. 6-month above ankle major amputation of the index limb, 2. 6-month major re-intervention (i.e., angioplasty of target lesion, new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft, or thrombectomy or thrombolysis) 3. Perioperative (30 day) mortality.
6-months for n.1 and n.2; 30 days for n.3
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Secondary Safety endpoint 1
1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Secondary Safety endpoint 2
1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Secondary Safety endpoint 3
1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Secondary Safety endpoint 4
From day 0 to day 14
Secondary Safety endpoint 5
From day 0 to 60 months
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MagicTouch PTA sirolimus DCB
ACTIVE COMPARATORMagicTouch PTA sirolimus drug coated balloon (DCB) in addition to standard balloon angioplasty
Placebo balloon angioplasty
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo balloon angioplasty in addition to standard balloon angioplasty (PTA)
Interventions
All patients must first be treated with pre dilatation with a standard balloon angioplasty using any standard balloon catheters at the discretion of the operator. Magic Touch PTA Sirolimus coated balloon catheter is an adjunct treatment that should be used in combination with standard balloon angioplasty. Following successful crossing of wire across the lesion and plain balloon angioplasty of arterial lesion with successful lesion preparation with residual lesion \<30%, subjects will be randomized to receive study device balloon. If patients are assigned to MagicTouch PTA Sirolimus DCB, the Angioplasty of lower limb will be performed with this device in addition to standard balloon angioplasty.
For participants randomized to a Placebo balloon angioplasty group, a Placebo balloon angioplasty in addition to standard balloon angioplasty will be performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Rutherford class 4 with documented WIFI score, not exceeding more than 30% of target patient population.
- Rutherford class 5 to 6 in the target limb with documented WIFI score.
- Single or sequential de novo or re-stenotic lesions (stenosis of \> 50% or occlusions) from 2 to 20cm in the proximal 200mm of below the knee arteries. Lesion is considered as one lesion if there is maximum of 30 mm gap between lesions at discretion of investigator. Below the knee arteries are Tibio-peroneal trunk, Peroneal bifurcation, anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery and peroneal artery. With documented Distal Run off a maximum of two tibial vessels can be treated in the index procedure. Inflow free from flow limiting lesions (\<50% stenosis) confirmed by duplex or angiography. Subjects with flow limiting inflow lesions (\>50% stenosis) can be included if lesion had been treated successfully (\<30% residual stenosis) before or during the index procedure.
- Target vessel has angiographically documented unimpaired (\<50% stenosis) run off into a named Tibio-pedal artery (Peroneal, Anterior Tibial/ Dorsalis Pedis/ Posterior Tibial Artery)
You may not qualify if:
- Comorbid conditions limiting life expectancy ≤ 1 year
- Subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached first primary endpoint yet
- Subject is lactating, pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Subject with extensive tissue loss salvageable only with complex foot reconstruction or non-traditional trans metatarsal amputation. This includes subjects with:
- Osteomyelitis including and/or proximal to the metatarsal head
- Gangrene involving the plantar skin of the forefoot, midfoot,or heel
- Deep ulcer or large shallow ulcer (\> 3 cm) involving the plantar skin of the forefoot, midfoot, or heel
- Full thickness heel ulcer with/without calcaneal involvement
- Any wound with calcaneal bone involvement
- Wounds that are deemed to be neuropathic or non-ischemic in nature
- Wounds that would require flap coverage or complex wound management for large soft tissue defect
- Full thickness wounds on the dorsum of the foot with exposed tendon or bone
- Prior bypass surgery of target vessel
- Planned amputation of the target limb (major)
- Previously implanted stent in the target lesion
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (29)
Honor Health Research & Innovation Institute
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Clearwater Cardiovascular Consultants
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Baptist Hospital of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33176, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Vascular Institute of the Midwest
Davenport, Iowa, 52807, United States
Unity Point Health Des Moines
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309, United States
Atria Vascular and Vein
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334, United States
Deborah Heart and Lung Center
Browns Mills, New Jersey, 08015, United States
Virtua Healthcare - Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes
Marlton, New Jersey, 08053, United States
Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center
Lake Success, New York, 11042, United States
NYU Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016, United States
The Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Columbia University Irving Medical center/NYPH
New York, New York, 10032, United States
New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medical Center Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
New York, New York, 10065, United States
St. Francis Hospital and Heart Center
Roslyn, New York, 11576, United States
Westchester Medical Center
Valhalla, New York, 10595, United States
The Christ Hospital Network Outpatient Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research Bryn Mawr Hospital
Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010, United States
University of Pennsylvania - Penn Heart and Vascular Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Medical University of South Carolina(MUSC) Health Ashley River Tower
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75226, United States
HOPE Vascular and Podiatry
Houston, Texas, 77054, United States
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
San Antonio Vascular and Endovascular Clinic
San Antonio, Texas, 78221, United States
University of Washington Seattle
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Related Publications (9)
Giacoppo D, Cassese S, Harada Y, Colleran R, Michel J, Fusaro M, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 22;9(16):1731-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.008.
PMID: 27539695RESULTClever YP, Peters D, Calisse J, Bettink S, Berg MC, Sperling C, Stoever M, Cremers B, Kelsch B, Bohm M, Speck U, Scheller B. Novel Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Catheter: In Vivo Evaluation in a Porcine Coronary Model. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003543. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003543.
PMID: 27069105RESULTVerheye S, Vrolix M, Kumsars I, Erglis A, Sondore D, Agostoni P, Cornelis K, Janssens L, Maeng M, Slagboom T, Amoroso G, Jensen LO, Granada JF, Stella P. The SABRE Trial (Sirolimus Angioplasty Balloon for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis): Angiographic Results and 1-Year Clinical Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2029-2037. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
PMID: 28964764RESULTPatel A, Irani FG, Pua U, Tay KH, Chong TT, Leong S, Chan ES, Tan GWL, Burgmans MC, Zhuang KD, Quek LHH, Kwan J, Damodharan K, Gogna A, Tan BP, Too CW, Chan SXJM, Chng SP, Yuan W, Tan BS. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Treating Below-the-Knee Arteries in Critical Limb Ischemia: The SINGA-PACLI Trial. Radiology. 2021 Sep;300(3):715-724. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204294. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
PMID: 34227886RESULTChoke E, Tang TY, Peh E, Damodharan K, Cheng SC, Tay JS, Finn AV. MagicTouch PTA Sirolimus Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal and Below the Knee Disease: Results From XTOSI Pilot Study Up To 12 Months. J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Oct;29(5):780-789. doi: 10.1177/15266028211064816. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
PMID: 34911383RESULTRosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, Rocha-Singh K, Mena-Hurtado C, Metzger DC, Brodmann M, Pilger E, Zeller T, Krishnan P, Gammon R, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Nehler MR, Benenati JF, Scheinert D; LEVANT 2 Investigators. Trial of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):145-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406235. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
PMID: 26106946RESULTSteiner S, Willfort-Ehringer A, Sievert H, Geist V, Lichtenberg M, Del Giudice C, Sauguet A, Diaz-Cartelle J, Marx C, Strobel A, Schult I, Scheinert D; RANGER SFA Investigators. 12-Month Results From the First-in-Human Randomized Study of the Ranger Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 28;11(10):934-941. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.276. Epub 2018 May 2.
PMID: 29730375RESULTZeller T, Baumgartner I, Scheinert D, Brodmann M, Bosiers M, Micari A, Peeters P, Vermassen F, Landini M, Snead DB, Kent KC, Rocha-Singh KJ; IN.PACT DEEP Trial Investigators. Drug-eluting balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in critical limb ischemia: 12-month results from the IN.PACT DEEP randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1198.
PMID: 25301459RESULTMustapha JA, Brodmann M, Geraghty PJ, Saab F, Settlage RA, Jaff MR; Lutonix BTK Study Investigators. Drug-Coated vs Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Infrapopliteal Arteries: Six-Month Results of the Lutonix BTK Trial. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Aug;31(8):205-211. doi: 10.25270/jic/19.3108.205.
PMID: 31368893RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sahil Parikh, MD
New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Pavilion
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a single-blinded clinical investigation in which subjects will be blinded.The physician performing the index procedure will not be blinded. It is recommended, where feasible, that a different physician, or qualified designee, who is blinded to the subject's treatment, conduct protocol-required follow-up visits. The Study Coordinator will be unblinded. The technologists performing follow-up ultrasound scans, the Clinical Events Committee, the Data Safety Monitoring Board and core laboratories will be blinded. In emergency situations, the treating physician is responsible for assessing whether unblinding the treatment assignment is necessary, with the subject's safety as the first priority in making such a decision. If the treating physician decides that unblinding is warranted, the investigator will contact Concept Medical or the CRO to obtain the treatment assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2023
First Posted
December 26, 2023
Study Start
January 16, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2031
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12