Enhancing Team Effectiveness for a Collaborative School-based Intervention for ADHD
2 other identifiers
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed project aims to integrate team-based implementation strategies with an established school-based intervention for children with ADHD, the Collaborative Life Skills Program (CLS), to enhance its implementation and optimize its effectiveness. The investigators will tailor three empirically-supported team development interventions, Team Charters, Team Communication Training (Student Handoff Protocols), and Team Performance Monitoring, and integrate them into a team-enhanced CLS implementation protocol (CLS-T). Team Charters are a written document developed collaboratively by the team at the outset of their work together outlining expectations, goals, roles and responsibilities, and relevant policies and procedures for team collaborative operations. Research shows that Team Charters strengthen affective emergent states, such as trust and cohesion among team members, as well as cognitive emergent states, such as shared mental models. They also strengthen team processes, such as goal specification, communication, and coordination to optimize team effectiveness. Handoff protocols are widely used interventions for ensuring continuity in patient care and minimizing errors in medical settings. They have also been found to improve affective (e.g., trust, cohesion) and cognitive (e.g., shared mental models, situation awareness) emergent states among team members, enhancing team communication and coordination. Finally, Team Performance Monitoring provides feedback to teams that can motivate performance, provide opportunities for adaptation in the event of challenges, and prompt communication among team members. The investigators will conduct a Hybrid Type III cluster randomized trial in 24 schools in two large urban school districts, to evaluate whether CLS-T implementation results in improved implementation outcomes and child outcomes in comparison to standard CLS implementation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2027
April 15, 2024
April 1, 2024
3.4 years
November 27, 2023
April 11, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of Intervention Measure
This 12-item measure will be completed by parents, teachers, and SMHPs at post-intervention to assess the extent to which the CLS intervention, Team Charters, Handoff protocols, and Team Progress Monitoring and Assessment procedures are appealing, liked, and welcomed in their setting (acceptability); fitting, suitable, and applicable in their setting (appropriateness); possible and doable in their setting (feasible).
Post-intervention (immediately following intervention)
Intervention Fidelity
Fidelity monitoring observation checklists will be adapted in Year 1 from those previously developed for CLS to measure fidelity of SMHP training in standard CLS and CLS-T, as well as SMHP implementation of each component of the CLS and the TBIS. A separate measure of SMHP competence in executing the treatment will be adapted from the CLS Implementation Quality Form used in previous trials, which will be completed by the trainer after each "live" observation. Items assess clarity of skill presentation, thoroughness of homework review, use of practical examples, and effectiveness of handout review rated by the trainer on a 1- 5 scale (from 1=not at all to 5= most). The child-group version includes items such as use of effective commands, prompts and praise, and clarity of skill presentation rated by the trainer on a 1-5 scale (from 1=not at all to 5=most). A second research team member (blinded to group assignment) will rate 15% of sessions to estimate inter-rater reliability.
Weekly during 3-month long intervention
DBRC Completion
The proportion of school days the school eDBRC was implemented each week will be calculated based on the number of completed eDBRCs, divided by the overall count of possible school days during the week, as we have done in previous trials.13 School holidays (coded from the online student calendar for each school), child absence, special school events/field trips and substitute teacher days (when noted on the eDBRC) will not be included in the overall count of possible school days during the week.
Weekly during 3-month long intervention
Parenting Skill Use Diary
This 2-item measures assesses parent's use of behavioral strategies in responses to adaptive, as well as maladaptive child behaviors. It is completed in a daily diary format.
Daily during 3-month long intervention
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Parents, teachers, and SMHPs will completed this 10-item agnostic scale assessing product usability, with SUS scores above 80 indicating good usability.57-59 SUS will be completed by SMHPs, teachers, and parents after pre-intervention focus groups, and at the post-intervention assessment of the randomized trial to assess usability of each TBIS.
Post-Intervention (immediately following intervention)
Sustained Use of EBP Strategies
SMHPs, parents, and teachers will each complete customized measures that query whether they are still using the skills learned in CLS during the subsequent school year, with new students/teachers. The scales will be adapted from scales used in previous clinical trials evaluating CLS and will include questions about use of the TBIS.
Follow-up (6 months after the end of intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Homework Problems Checklist
Pre-intervention (immediately before intervention begins), Post-intervention (immediately following intervention), Follow-up (6 months after the end of intervention).
Academic Competency Evaluation Scale
Pre-intervention (immediately before intervention begins), post-intervention (immediately following intervention), and follow up (6 months after the end of intervention)
Children's Organizational Skills Scales
Pre-intervention (immediately before intervention begins), post-intervention (immediately following intervention), and follow up (6 months after the end of intervention)
Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5
Pre-intervention (immediately before intervention begins), post-intervention (immediately following intervention), and follow up (6 months after the end of intervention)
Social Skills Improvement System
Pre-intervention (immediately before intervention begins), post-intervention (immediately following intervention), and follow up (6 months after the end of intervention)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Card-Sorting Task
Post-intervention (immediately following intervention)
Working Alliance Inventory Short Form (WAI-SR)
Post-intervention (immediately following intervention)
McAllister Affect-Based Trust
Post-intervention (immediately following intervention)
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard Collaborative Life Skills Program Implementation
ACTIVE COMPARATORCLS is a school-delivered intervention coordinating three empirically-supported approaches: teacher consultation and a daily behavior report card, behavioral parent training and child skills training. The three components are integrated over a 10-12 week period to improve symptoms and functional impairment among youth with ADHD.
Team-Enhanced Collaborative Life Skills Program Implementation
EXPERIMENTALWe will integrate three team-based implementation strategies to enhance team effectiveness in CLS, including Team Charters, Team Communication Training via Student Handoff Protocols, and Team Performance Monitoring. These interventions have been shown to improve cognitive (e.g., shared mental models) and affective ((e.g., trust, collective efficacy) team-based emergent states and enhance team-based processes, such as communication and coordination.
Interventions
We will integrate three team-based implementation strategies to enhance team effectiveness in CLS, including Team Charters, Team Communication Training via Student Handoff Protocols, and Team Performance Monitoring. These interventions have been shown to improve cognitive (e.g., shared mental models) and affective ((e.g., trust, collective efficacy) team-based emergent states and enhance team-based processes, such as communication and coordination.
CLS is a school-delivered intervention coordinating three empirically-supported approaches: teacher consultation and a daily behavior report card, behavioral parent training and child skills training. The three components are integrated over a 10-12 week period to improve symptoms and functional impairment among youth with ADHD.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Youth ages of 7-11 years (2-5th grade) who are attending a participating school
- Child referred by a school mental health provider (SMHP) with apparent ADHD-related problems,
- ≥6 symptoms (item score ≥2) of Inattention or Hyperactivity-Impulsivity on the pooled parent and teacher Child Symptom Inventory
- ≥3 on the Impairment Rating Scale by parent and teacher (cross-situational impairment)
- Caretaker and teacher consent to participate in treatment and child provides assent.
You may not qualify if:
- No presence of conditions that are incompatible with this study's treatment including: severe visual or hearing impairment, severe language delay or intellectual impairment, psychosis, pervasive developmental disorder
- Child is in an all-day special education classroom (children in these classrooms are frequently receiving intensive behavior modification programs such that the intervention would be expected to require modification for use in these settings)
- Parent/primary caregiver or child does not read or speak English. Note: Participats will need to be able to read/speak English because all measures are in English, and the intervention will be conducted in English. Parents will be given the option of having a research staff member assist them in completing the assessment measures.
- Children planning to change (start or stop) psychotropic medication Note: Children taking medication will be required to meet all entry criteria, including impairment criteria, thus indicating a need for the intervention. Children taking medication for attention or behavior are eligible as long as their medication regimens are stable.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, San Diegolead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
- University of California, San Franciscocollaborator
- San Diego State Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
IN STEP Children's Mental Health Center
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Miguel Villodas, Ph.D.
San Diego State University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Linda Pfiffner, Ph.D.
University of California, San Francisco
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2023
First Posted
December 22, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2027
Last Updated
April 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04