NCT06166745

Brief Summary

The study is designed as a prospective, randomized, parallel arm, double blinded, pilot clinical trial.The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of Sensi-IP +NaF as compared to a NaF toothpaste in the reduction of dentin hypersensitivity in adult participants over 14 days. Study endpoints include Evaporative Air blast Stimuli (Schiff Airblast Sensitivity Score), Tactile Stimuli (Yeaple probe Assessment), Visual Analogue Scale Evaporative Stimuli and the occurrence of adverse events. The study will include 2 study arms: 1. Sodium fluoride toothpaste with Sensi IP (N=23) and 2. Sodium fluoride toothpaste (N=23). Total of 46 participants (ages 18-80 years) with at least one hypersensitive tooth in 2 different quadrants which are anterior to the molars will be enrolled.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 6, 2023

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2023

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2023

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 23, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 19, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

December 3, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

FluorideDentine HypersensitivityToothpaste

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline at Day 14 using the Schiff Airblast Sensitivity Score

    Schiff Airblast sensitivity score is mainly used to assess participant response to evaporated air stimuli. The scale is 0-3 and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    14 Days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change from baseline at Day 14 using the Yeaple probe assessment

    14 Days

  • Change from baseline at Day 14 using the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain following evaporative stimuli

    14 Days

Other Outcomes (1)

  • The occurrence of adverse events that are possibly, probably, or definitely related to the product

    14 days

Study Arms (2)

Sensi-IP toothpaste

EXPERIMENTAL

Sodium Fluoride Toothpaste with Sensi-IP

Device: Sensi-IP toothpaste

Sodium fluoride toothpaste

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Sodium Fluoride Toothpaste

Device: Sodium Fluoride Toothpaste

Interventions

Brushing daily with the Sensi-IP toothpaste for 14 days for dentinal hypersensitivity.

Sensi-IP toothpaste

Brushing daily with the Sodium Fluoride toothpaste for 14 days for dentinal hypersensitivity.

Sodium fluoride toothpaste

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Willing and able to abide by the terms of the consent form
  • Can independently sign informed consent
  • Participants 18-80 years old
  • Agree to abstain from any other desensitizing, (stannous fluoride, arginine, calcium phosphosilicate, nanohydroxy apatite, potassium nitrate and varieties) whitening or other dental procedures for the duration of the trial
  • Agree to refrain from all oral hygiene procedures (in addition to the Study Product) and chewing gum for 8 h prior to each scheduled visit and refrained from eating and drinking for 4 h prior to each visit (sips of water is allowed for taking routine medications).
  • Have at least two hypersensitive teeth (≥2 Schiff Airblast Sensitivity Score) consistent at screening and baseline.
  • Target Teeth:
  • Demonstrate cervical dentin exposure, which may be visible with the use of loupes
  • Are non-adjacent in 2 different quadrants, anterior to the molars.

You may not qualify if:

  • Are pregnant (to be confirmed by an over-the-counter dipstick pregnancy test) or breast feeding
  • Have lip or tongue piercing which the subject is unwilling to remove for the duration of the study
  • Have an active oral ulcer (Aphthous ulcer) at the time of screening
  • Have undergone desensitizing treatment (stannous fluoride, arginine, calcium phosphosilicate, nanohydroxy apatite, potassium nitrate and varieties) within the 1 month preceding the screening visit
  • Have undergone tooth bleaching within 8 weeks of screening
  • Have undergone scale, polish, interventional dental procedures within 1 month of screening
  • Are currently undergoing orthodontics
  • Receiving concomitant medication/therapy that might affect dentine hypersensitivity, e.g., regular use (\>3X per week) of analgesics, antihistamines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medication
  • Demonstrate severe bruxism as indicated by reported muscular pain
  • Reduced salivary flow as determined by clinical assessment and/or patient report, diagnosed with Sjogren's disease, received radiation therapy to the head or neck within a year or currently being on medications that may cause xerostomia
  • Have generalized gingivitis or active periodontal disease as determined by the clinical exam or undergoing treatment for the above disease
  • Have had gingival surgery in the previous six months
  • Have allergies to any Study toothpaste ingredients, including the flavor components
  • With active caries or any condition such as pulpitis that would precipitate mouth pain
  • Who have self-reported eating disorders, uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD or Acid Reflux), excessive dietary or environmental exposure to acids, or other systemic conditions that are predisposing to dentinal hypersensitivity
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Forsyth Institute

Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02142, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Richmond NL. Dental hypersensitivity: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 1993 Jan-Feb;72(1):20-2.

    PMID: 8478751BACKGROUND
  • Davari A, Ataei E, Assarzadeh H. Dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis and treatment; a literature review. J Dent (Shiraz). 2013 Sep;14(3):136-45.

    PMID: 24724135BACKGROUND
  • Addy M, West NX. The role of toothpaste in the aetiology and treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Monogr Oral Sci. 2013;23:75-87. doi: 10.1159/000350477. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

    PMID: 23817061BACKGROUND
  • Poulsen S, Errboe M, Hovgaard O, Worthington HW. Potassium nitrate toothpaste for dentine hypersensitivity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2):CD001476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001476.

    PMID: 11405992BACKGROUND
  • Mantzourani M, Sharma D. Dentine sensitivity: past, present and future. J Dent. 2013 Jul;41 Suppl 4:S3-17. doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(13)70002-2.

    PMID: 23929643BACKGROUND
  • Shearer A, Montazerian M, Sly JJ, Hill RG, Mauro JC. Trends and perspectives on the commercialization of bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater. 2023 Apr 1;160:14-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

    PMID: 36804821BACKGROUND
  • Hu ML, Zheng G, Zhang YD, Yan X, Li XC, Lin H. Effect of desensitizing toothpastes on dentine hypersensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018 Aug;75:12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 19.

    PMID: 29787782BACKGROUND
  • MacDonald K, Boudreau E, Thomas GV, Badrock TC, Davies LJ, Lloyd MJ, Spradbery PS, Turner-Cahill S, Boyd D. In vitro evaluation of Sensi-IP(R): A soluble and mineralizing sensitivity solution. Heliyon. 2021 Dec 25;8(1):e08672. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08672. eCollection 2022 Jan.

    PMID: 35036593BACKGROUND
  • Bakri MM, Hossain MZ, Razak FA, Saqina ZH, Misroni AA, Ab-Murat N, Kitagawa J, Saub RB. Dentinal tubules occluded by bioactive glass-containing toothpaste exhibit high resistance toward acidic soft drink challenge. Aust Dent J. 2017 Jun;62(2):186-191. doi: 10.1111/adj.12484. Epub 2017 May 22.

    PMID: 27813093BACKGROUND
  • Schiff T, Delgado E, Zhang YP, Cummins D, DeVizio W, Mateo LR. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate in providing instant and lasting relief of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 2009 Mar;22 Spec No A:8A-15A.

    PMID: 19472556BACKGROUND
  • Nathoo S, Delgado E, Zhang YP, DeVizio W, Cummins D, Mateo LR. Comparing the efficacy in providing instant relief of dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride relative to a benchmark desensitizing toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion and 1450 ppm fluoride, and to a control toothpaste with 1450 ppm fluoride: a three-day clinical study in New Jersey, USA. J Clin Dent. 2009;20(4):123-30.

    PMID: 19831165BACKGROUND
  • Seong J, Newcombe RG, Foskett HL, Davies M, West NX. A randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of an aluminium lactate/potassium nitrate/hydroxylapatite toothpaste with a control toothpaste for the prevention of dentine hypersensitivity. J Dent. 2021 May;108:103619. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103619. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

    PMID: 33647373BACKGROUND
  • Hasturk H, Boyd D, MacDonald-Parsons K, Turner-Cahill S, Seong J, West N, Doucette HJ. Comparative efficacy of novel bioactive glass versus sodium fluoride toothpaste for dentin hypersensitivity. J Periodontol. 2025 Dec 10. doi: 10.1002/jper.70024. Online ahead of print.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Heather Doucette

    IR Scientific Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2023

First Posted

December 12, 2023

Study Start

November 6, 2023

Primary Completion

December 23, 2023

Study Completion

April 15, 2024

Last Updated

April 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Locations