Connective Tissue Matrix for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Connective Tissue Matrix (CTM) for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to determine if the effectiveness of a single injection of CTM Boost in the treatment of patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) is as effective as a single injection of platelet rich plasma (PRP) in reducing the symptoms of RCT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2023
Longer than P75 for phase_4
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2028
September 8, 2025
April 1, 2025
3.1 years
November 29, 2023
September 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
determine if injection of CTM Boost is non-inferior to injection of PRP
Mean Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) Score The WORC has 21 items in four domains, including physical symptoms (10 questions), sports/recreation/work (4 questions), lifestyle (4 questions) and emotions (3 questions). Raw scores range from 0 to 2100, with a higher score indicating decreased quality of life because of pathological condition of the rotator cuff.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Mean Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) Score
at 6 months
assessment of superiority of CTM to PRP (if non-inferiority established)/ WORC Score
Each visit up to 24 months
assessment of superiority of CTM to PRP (if non-inferiority established) / VAS Pain Scale
Each visit up to 24 months
assessment of superiority of CTM to PRP (if non-inferiority established) / SANE
Each visit up to 24 months
assessment of superiority of CTM to PRP (if non-inferiority established) / ASES
Each visit up to 24 months
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CTM Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL2.0 cc (cubic centimeter) dose injection of CTM Boost will be administered by injection directly into the rotator cuff using a 20 gauge needle.
PRP Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach participant randomized to this arm will receive a single injection of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP).
Interventions
Connective Tissue Matrix (CTM) Boost is a decellularized Human Cellular and Tissue Based Allograft derived from placental connective tissue. It is considered a minimally-manipulated biologic by the FDA and is marketed as an allograft for repairing connective tissue. It is administered via injection.
PRP is derived by a sample of blood drawn from a patient and concentrated to include mainly platelets and potent inflammatory mediators which promote healing. At baseline, a blood draw of 60 milliliter (mL) will be obtained and concentrated in an Angel System to yield 5 cc of PRP and a supra-physiological concentration of white blood cells. All injections will be done under ultrasound guidance. A two-part injection process will be used. An advancing 20 gauge 1.5-inch needle first placed 3 mL of 1% xylocaine proximal to the tendinopathic area or tear. The needle will then be re-inserted at the proximal aspect of the lesion and slowly removed while infiltrating of 5 mL of PRP without activation with Calcium Chloride/thrombin at the lesion and surrounding tendon.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-80 years old with rotator cuff tendinopathy
- A PRP or CTM-type injection was determined by the clinician to be the proper medical treatment course and patient is willing to undergo the injection
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with adhesive capsulitis
- Patients with acromio-clavicular joint impingement, retracted tears, significant labral lesions or significant glenohumeral arthrosis
- Patients with joint instability
- History of shoulder surgery or corticosteroid injection in the past 3 months
- Patients with any medical conditions that affect healing, such as end-stage renal disease or uncontrolled diabetes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Allegheny Health Network Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
Allegheny Health Network Federal North Medical Office Building
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
AHN Wexford Health & Wellness Pavilion
Wexford, Pennsylvania, 15090, United States
AHN Wexford Hospital
Wexford, Pennsylvania, 15090, United States
Related Publications (12)
A Hamid MS, Sazlina SG. Platelet-rich plasma for rotator cuff tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0251111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251111. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33970936BACKGROUNDLin MT, Wei KC, Wu CH. Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Mar 28;10(4):189. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10040189.
PMID: 32231127BACKGROUNDGotoh M, Hamada K, Yamakawa H, Yanagisawa K, Nakamura M, Yamazaki H, Ueyama Y, Tamaoki N, Inoue A, Fukuda H. Interleukin-1-induced subacromial synovitis and shoulder pain in rotator cuff diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Sep;40(9):995-1001. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.9.995.
PMID: 11561109BACKGROUNDGotoh M, Hamada K, Yamakawa H, Nakamura M, Yamazaki H, Ueyama Y, Tamaoki N, Inoue A, Fukuda H. Perforation of rotator cuff increases interleukin 1beta production in the synovium of glenohumeral joint in rotator cuff diseases. J Rheumatol. 2000 Dec;27(12):2886-92.
PMID: 11128681BACKGROUNDYanagisawa K, Hamada K, Gotoh M, TokunagaT, Oshika Y, Tomisawa M, Lee YH, Handa A, Kijima H, Yamazaki H, Nakamura M, Ueyama Y, Tamaoki N, Fukuda H. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in the subacromial bursa is increased in patients with impingement syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2001 May;19(3):448-55. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)90021-4.
PMID: 11398859BACKGROUNDSachinis NP, Yiannakopoulos CK, Chalidis B, Kitridis D, Givissis P. Biomolecules Related to Rotator Cuff Pain: A Scoping Review. Biomolecules. 2022 Jul 22;12(8):1016. doi: 10.3390/biom12081016.
PMID: 35892325BACKGROUNDDean BJ, Snelling SJ, Dakin SG, Murphy RJ, Javaid MK, Carr AJ. Differences in glutamate receptors and inflammatory cell numbers are associated with the resolution of pain in human rotator cuff tendinopathy. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Jul 10;17(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0691-5.
PMID: 26160609BACKGROUNDChen J, Svensson J, Sundberg CJ, Ahmed AS, Ackermann PW. FGF gene expression in injured tendons as a prognostic biomarker of 1-year patient outcome after Achilles tendon repair. J Exp Orthop. 2021 Mar 11;8(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00335-0.
PMID: 33694106BACKGROUNDScarpone M, Rabago D, Snell E, Demeo P, Ruppert K, Pritchard P, Arbogast G, Wilson JJ, Balzano JF. Effectiveness of Platelet-rich Plasma Injection for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Prospective Open-label Study. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 Mar;2(2):26-31. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2012.054.
PMID: 24416661BACKGROUNDBraun C, Handoll HH. Estimating the Minimal Important Difference for the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) in adults with shoulder pain associated with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Jun;35:30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
PMID: 29471221BACKGROUNDBushnell BD, Bishai SK, Krupp RJ, McMillan S, Schofield BA, Trenhaile SW, McIntyre LF. Treatment of Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears With a Resorbable Bioinductive Bovine Collagen Implant: 1-Year Results From a Prospective Multicenter Registry. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Aug 13;9(8):23259671211027850. doi: 10.1177/23259671211027850. eCollection 2021 Aug.
PMID: 34409115BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PMID: 17695343BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick Demeo, MD
Allegheny Health Network
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be randomized to one of the two arms by unblinded research personnel. Unblinded key study personnel will prepare the injection of either CTM Boost or PRP using an opaque sleeve to obscure the contents of the injection. Both patients and investigators will be blinded to treatment arm. Each participant will undergo an antecubital blood draw of 60 milliliers (mL). Staff will wait about 20 minutes after the blood draw to injection time. This will be done to maintain blinding due to the 17 minutes it takes for the system to produce PRP. For patients in the CTM arm, the PRP blood draw serves as a placebo draw and the specimen will be discarded afterwards, in order to maintain blinding
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Institute Chair of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2023
First Posted
December 7, 2023
Study Start
December 4, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 15, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 15, 2028
Last Updated
September 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share