NCT06159387

Brief Summary

2.1. General To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Cannabis sativa extract (CBD (Cannabidiol) + up to 0.3% THC (Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol)), compared to placebo, in the treatment of cocaine/crack use disorder. 2.2. Specifics

  • Compare the amount and frequency of cocaine use between the group treated with Cannabis sativa extract and the placebo group
  • Compare adherence to treatment between the group treated with Cannabis sativa extract and the placebo group
  • Evaluate the prevalence and intensity of depressive and anxious symptoms in patients using Cannabis sativa extract compared to patients using placebo
  • Evaluate the incidence and severity of side effects in the active group compared to placebo.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 23, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 28, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 6, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 23, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 23, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 13, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 28, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Crack/cocaineClinical trialCannabis extractPharmacotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy of the extract of cannabis compared to placebo

    The primary outcome will be the comparison of treatment efficacy between the active and placebo groups at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12. This outcome will be assessed through: Self-report of improvement by TLFB: The number of days of use and the amount of drugs consumed on those days are registered. Decrease in crack intensity measured by the MCCS instrument. The MCCS reports the frequency, intensity, and duration of the craving during the last week. Negative test for cocaine/crack by urine test indicates no use

    biweekly

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Safety of the extract of cannabis in patients with crack/cocaine use disorders admitted to treatment

    biweekly

Study Arms (2)

Cannabis extract

EXPERIMENTAL

Thirty patients will receive cannabis extract (total daily dose) 384 mg of CBD and 11.4 mg of THC divided into one intake in the morning (1 mL of oily solution - 192 mg of CBD and 5.7 mg of THC) and one intake in the evening ( 1 mL of oily solution - 192 mg of CBD and 5.7 mg of THC) during breakfast and dinner and psychotherapy.

Drug: Cannabis Extract Oil SR Capsule

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The other 30 subjects will receive placebo (same volumes of oily solution without active ingredient) and psychotherapy. Titration will be done with an initial dose of 1 mL taken at night and increased over 2 days to 1 mL morning and night. Patients using placebo will make similar increments to maintain the blind nature of the study.

Drug: Cannabis Extract Oil SR Capsule

Interventions

After randomization, in a double blind model, subjects receive cannabis extract or placebo conditioned in identical vials with the same volume of substance. Everyone will undergo psychotherapy in the CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) model

Cannabis extractPlacebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over 18 years old Patients who meet the DSM-5 criteria for Cocaine use disorder.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with Schizophrenia and Bipolar Affective Disorder Patients with a history of severe head trauma Patients who used marijuana in the last month Patients who meet the criteria for other substances dependence besides crack/cocaine and tobacco.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Instituto Perdizes

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05021-001,, Brazil

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Karimi-Haghighi S, Razavi Y, Iezzi D, Scheyer AF, Manzoni O, Haghparast A. Cannabidiol and substance use disorder: Dream or reality. Neuropharmacology. 2022 Apr 1;207:108948. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.108948. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

    PMID: 35032495BACKGROUND
  • Ledesma JC, Manzanedo C, Aguilar MA. Cannabidiol prevents several of the behavioral alterations related to cocaine addiction in mice. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 20;111:110390. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110390. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

    PMID: 34157334BACKGROUND
  • Mongeau-Perusse V, Brissette S, Bruneau J, Conrod P, Dubreucq S, Gazil G, Stip E, Jutras-Aswad D. Cannabidiol as a treatment for craving and relapse in individuals with cocaine use disorder: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Addiction. 2021 Sep;116(9):2431-2442. doi: 10.1111/add.15417. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

    PMID: 33464660BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cocaine-Related Disorders

Interventions

nabiximols

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Substance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Andre Malbergier, MD, MPH, PhD

    Department of Psychiatry - University of São Paulo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Andre Malbergier, MD, MPH, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
A simple randomization are carried out in which the computer program generates a number (0 or 1) for each subject who enters the research. Zero is the the placebo group and 1 is the active drug group. Neither the evaluators nor the patients know which medication each research subject is taking. The laboratory provides identical solutions of active drug and placebo to ensure blinding of the research and only professionals in that laboratory know which is placebo or active drug.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: After admission, 60 patients are randomly allocated into 2 groups. A simple randomization are carried out in which the computer program generates a number (0 or 1) for each subject who enters the research. Zero is the the placebo group and 1 is the active drug group. Neither the evaluators nor the patients know which medication each research subject is taking. The laboratory provides identical solutions of active drug and placebo to ensure blinding of the research and only professionals in that laboratory know which is placebo or active drug.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, MPH, PhD, Head of Alcohol and Drugs Service

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2023

First Posted

December 6, 2023

Study Start

October 23, 2023

Primary Completion

October 23, 2024

Study Completion

October 23, 2025

Last Updated

December 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all collected IPD

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
October 2024 to october 2025
Access Criteria
Researchers in the field

Locations