Validity of Web-Based OSDI-6 Questionnaire in a Chinese Adult Population

NCT06158906 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: OSDI6
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 270
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Chinese translation version of OSDI-6 (C-OSDI-6) in a theoretical set-up of two questionnaire groups for dry eye

Conditions

Dry Eye

Keywords

qestionnaire

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• OSDI12

  The patient will answer each question on a scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating 'none of the time' and 4 indicating 'all of the time'. If a certain question is deemed irrelevant, it will be marked as 'not applicable (N/A)' and excluded from the analysis. The OSDI total score is calculated according to the following formula. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing more severe cases of dry eye syndrome

  Baseline

Study Arms (1)

Study group

Dry eye patients were recruited to fill in the questionnaire

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 70 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have been diagnosed with dry eye

You may qualify if:

• Diagnosed dry eye
• Able and willing to comply with the schedule
• Able to read and understand the C-OSDI-12 questionnaire independently

You may not qualify if:

• The researchers judged to be not suitable

Sponsors & Collaborators

• He Eye Hospital: lead

Study Sites (1)

He Eye Hospital

Shenyang, None Selected, 110034, China

Location

Related Publications (6)

• Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Dana R, Deng SX, Dong PN, Geerling G, Hida RY, Liu Y, Seo KY, Tauber J, Wakamatsu TH, Xu J, Wolffsohn JS, Craig JP. TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):575-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

  PMID: 28736343 BACKGROUND

• Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

  PMID: 28736335 BACKGROUND

• Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615-21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615.

  PMID: 10815152 BACKGROUND

• Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Performance and repeatability of the NEI-VFQ-25 in patients with dry eye. Cornea. 2002 Aug;21(6):578-83. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200208000-00009.

  PMID: 12131034 BACKGROUND

• Lu F, Tao A, Hu Y, Tao W, Lu P. Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Three Common Dry Eye Questionnaires in Chinese. J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 27;2018:2401213. doi: 10.1155/2018/2401213. eCollection 2018.

  PMID: 30225139 BACKGROUND

• Midorikawa-Inomata A, Inomata T, Nojiri S, Nakamura M, Iwagami M, Fujimoto K, Okumura Y, Iwata N, Eguchi A, Hasegawa H, Kinouchi H, Murakami A, Kobayashi H. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e033940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033940.

  PMID: 31772113 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases; Eye Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: OTHER
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 28, 2023
• First Posted: December 6, 2023
• Study Start: December 1, 2023
• Primary Completion: February 17, 2024
• Study Completion: February 17, 2024
• Last Updated: February 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-11

Locations

CN (1)