Knee Care @Home Programme Feasibility Trial

NCT06152380 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: KC@H Feasibility
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 56
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

The main goal of this trial is to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial for the Knee Care at Home Programme, rather than the effectiveness, for patients recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Specifically, the trial aims to: (1) assess the feasibility of studying the effectiveness of the Knee Care at Home programme, including patient engagement and satisfaction; and (2) conduct a qualitative assessment to identify barriers and facilitators in the implementation and delivery of the programme.

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Keywords

Feasibility; Acceptability; Barriers; Facilitators; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Internet-based Intervention; Exercise Therapy; Patient Satisfaction; Patient Engagement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

• Enrolment: Screening

  Quantitative data: The number of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury who were approached and scheduled for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Qualitative data: Open-ended questions posed to the orthopaedic surgeon regarding any ambiguities surrounding the screening procedure.

  Preoperative consultation

• Enrolment: Informed Consent

  Quantitative data: The number of patients who have signed the informed consent. Qualitative data: Open-ended questions posed to patients regarding their reasons for not signing the consent form.

  Preoperative consultation

• Enrolment: Eligibility

  Quantitative data: (1) The number of patients assessed for eligibility; (2) The number of patients meeting the inclusion criteria; and (3) The number of patients included. Qualitative data: (1) Open-ended questions to patients about the reasons for not participating; and (2) Open-ended question to orthopaedic surgeons about the reasons for patient ineligibility and enrollment ambiguities.

  First consultation after surgery (second week)

• Enrolment: Allocation

  Quantitative data: (1) The number of patients who agreed to be randomly assigned; and (2) The number of patients who dropped out after randomisation. Qualitative data: (1) Open-ended questions to patients about any problems they experienced with randomisation; and (2) Open-ended questions to orthopaedic surgeons about their reluctance to randomise patients.

  First consultation after surgery (second week)

• Data Collection: Response rates

  Quantitative data includes the total number of outcome evaluation tools, the minutes spent using evaluation tools, and the number of unusable outcome measures.

  Up to 36 weeks postoperative

• Data Collection: Missing data

  Quantitative data includes the number of missing items.

  Up to 36 weeks postoperative

• Data Collection: Implementation and Technical issues

  Quantitative data: (1) Assessment of the costs and time allocated to resolving technical issues; and (2) Determination of the quantity of exercise and health coaches required to oversee patient recovery. Qualitative data: (1) Open-ended questions to patients regarding any technical issues encountered during remote sessions; and (2) Open-ended questions to exercise and health coaches regarding the adequacy of resources for remote sessions.

  During each remote session, there will be a total of 22 weeks with 42 sessions between the 2nd and 24th postoperative week.

• Intervention Fidelity: Adherence to the trial

  Patients will be assessed in three areas: \[1\] withdrawal rate, including the number of patients who completed at least one remote session and then decided to withdraw, as well as the time point of withdrawal decision (quantitative data), and open-ended questions to those who withdraw to explain their reasons (qualitative data); \[2\] completion rate, which measures the number of patients that attend all remote sessions and consultations (quantitative data); and \[3\] follow-up rate, which measures the number of patients who remained in the study throughout the intervention period as a proportion of the total number of participants recruited at baseline (quantitative data).

  During each orthopaedic consultation, there will be a total of 7 consultations on the 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, 20th, and 24th postoperative weeks, spanning a total of 22 weeks.

• Intervention Fidelity: Adherence rate at Remote sessions

  Areas: (1) General; (2) Consultations; (3) Compliance; and (4) Dosage. 1. Open-ended questions will be asked to participants and coaches about reasons for absence from remote sessions (qualitative data). 2. Data will be collected on completed evaluation consultations and duration (quantitative data). Open-ended questions will be asked to patients, surgeons, and assessors about reasons for non-compliance with evaluation consultations (qualitative data). 3. Data will be collected on attendance, cancellations, lateness, logins, and completed remote sessions (quantitative data). Patient log sheets will be evaluated for qualitative data. 4. Data will be collected on completed remote sessions, session parameters, exercises, and costs (quantitative data).

  During each remote session, there will be a total of 22 weeks with 42 sessions between the 2nd and 24th postoperative week.

• Intervention Fidelity: Adherence rate at Conventional Clinic-based Rehabilitation

  Quantitative data: (1) Determine the number of patients participating in conventional clinic-based rehabilitation; (2) Track the number of sessions per week and their duration; and (3) Calculate the indirect costs associated with conducting the sessions. Qualitative Data: Open-ended questions posed to patients to gather information about the reasons for their absence from conventional clinic-based rehabilitation.

  During each orthopaedic consultation, there will be a total of 7 consultations on the 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, 20th, and 24th postoperative weeks, spanning a total of 22 weeks.

• Intervention Fidelity: Quality of delivery

  Quantitative data: Questions about the exercise and health coach's capacity to deliver the remote sessions. Qualitative data: Application of a questionnaire on an ordinal scale to patients about their self-rated level of agreement to statements about the exercise program using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = strongly disagree and 10 = strongly agree).

  During each orthopaedic consultation, there will be a total of 7 consultations on the 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, 20th, and 24th postoperative weeks, spanning a total of 22 weeks.

• Intervention Fidelity: Participant Responsiveness

  Quantitative data: (1) The number of exercises the patient was able to complete; and (2) The level of interest of patients in remote sessions based on previous criteria. Qualitative data: Application of a questionnaire on an ordinal scale to exercise and health coaches about their perception of the participant's effort during the remote sessions (SIRAS Scale).

  During each remote session, there will be a total of 22 weeks with 42 sessions between the 2nd and 24th postoperative week.

• Intervention Fidelity: Safety (adverse events)

  Quantitative data: (1) Assessing the frequency of signs and symptoms during remote sessions and between consultations; (2) Tracking the number of outcome measures showing no improvement or positive evolution; and (3) Recording the instances of exercise performance with excessive workload.

  During each remote session, there will be a total of 22 weeks with 42 sessions between the 2nd and 24th postoperative week.

• Acceptability: Satisfaction

  Qualitative data: Patients will be asked to respond to some open-ended questions about their experience in remote sessions. These questions will be about: (1) attendance; (2) positive and negative consequences the intervention; and (3) other parameters about the intervention satisfaction it self. There will be a predetermined questionnaire on a Likert Scale, from 0=very dissatisfied, to 4=very satisfied regarding general satisfaction.

  During each orthopaedic consultation, there will be a total of 7 consultations on the 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, 20th, and 24th postoperative weeks, spanning a total of 22 weeks.

• Acceptability: Motivation

  Qualitative data: Participants are asked an open-ended question about their motivation to participate in the intervention using remote sessions.

  During each orthopaedic consultation, there will be a total of 7 consultations on the 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, 20th, and 24th postoperative weeks, spanning a total of 22 weeks.

Study Arms (2)

Clinic-based Rehabilitation

Individualised clinic-based face-to-face sessions with a physiotherapist in public or private rehabilitation facility

Knee Care @Home

Individualised synchronous internet-based remote sessions at home via conferencing software under the supervision of a certified exercise and health coach as a complement to conventional clinic-based rehabilitation sessions.

Other: Knee Care @Home Programme

Interventions

Knee Care @Home Programme OTHER

Over 24 weeks after undergoing surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, patients in the intervention group will receive supervised guidance on therapeutic exercises to be performed at home. This guidance will be provided through individualised synchronous internet-based remote sessions using conferencing software.

Also known as: Synchronous internet-based remote sessions, Therapeutic Exercises

Knee Care @Home

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 55 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at Hospital da Misericórdia de Évora.

You may qualify if:

• Undergone primary ACLR regardless of surgical method and choice of autograft.
• Have a healthy contralateral (opposite) knee.
• The time between ACL injury and ACLR should not exceed 12 months.

You may not qualify if:

• Declined to participate.
• Concomitant osteochondral injuries.
• Undergone multiple reconstructions of the lateral collateral ligament or posterior cruciate ligament.
• Significant lower limb injuries within the 12 months before the ACL injury.
• Medical conditions that may affect recovery.
• Using medication for mental disorders.
• Severe impairments in communication or balance.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Évora: lead
• Comprehensive Health Research Center: collaborator
• Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia: collaborator
• Hospital da Misericórdia de Évora: collaborator

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction; Patient Participation

Interventions

Exercise Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and Compliance; Health Behavior; Behavior; Patient Acceptance of Health Care

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rehabilitation; Aftercare; Continuity of Patient Care; Patient Care; Therapeutics; Physical Therapy Modalities

Central Study Contacts

Daniela Carmelo Pina, MSc

CONTACT

965732769; dcpina@outlook.pt

João Paulo Sousa, PhD

CONTACT

919662332; jsousa@uevora.pt

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: OTHER
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Auxiliar Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 15, 2023
• First Posted: November 30, 2023
• Study Start: December 1, 2023
• Primary Completion: January 30, 2024
• Study Completion: February 28, 2024
• Last Updated: November 30, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11