Effects of Resistance Sprint Training With and Without Power Training on Sprint and Agility Performance

NCT06147193 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: REC/RCRS/1021 Tehreem
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 38
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study will be randomized clinical trial will be used to get expected outcomes. Hence under ethical consideration athletes of Pakistan football federation will go under the selection criteria and chosen voluntarily to participate in the study. Data will be collected with non-probability convenient sampling technique and 40 football players will be participated in this study. Participates will be divided into two groups with randomization process. 20 athletes will be in each group. Group A will be treated with squats jumps, change of direction speed, countermovement jump, bench press, Romanian deadlift and barbell squats, resistance band sprints, stair sprints and weighted sled pulls and Group B will be treated with squats jumps, change of direction speed, countermovement jump, resistance band sprints, stairs sprints and weighted sled pulls. These exercises will be given in 3 sets with 10 repetitions in each set. Pre and post interventions measures will be taken on 1st day and at 6th week there will be 3 sessions in a week. SPSS version 25 will be used to analyze the data.

Conditions

Resistance Sprint Training With and Without Power

Keywords

Agility Training; Football; Power Training; Resistance Sprint Training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

• Resisted sprinting speeds at 10-30 m

  The athlete sprints a distance of 10-30m while pushing or pulling against resistance. This resistance can be provided by various means, such as sled, resistance band, or a partner holding onto a harness worn by athlete. A study suggested that the magnitude of the correlation coefficient between speed-test results and match parameters was considered as small (0.1 ≤ r \< 0.3), moderate (0.3 ≤ r \< 0.5), large (0.5 ≤ r \< 0.7), very large (0.7 ≤ r \< 0.9), and nearly perfect (r ≥ 0.9)

  Change from Baseline at 6 weeks

• Change of direction speed (COD) testing

  This test consists of four 5-m sections marked with cones set at 100° angles. Three maximal attempts were performed with a 5-min rest interval between attempts. Starting from a standing position with the front foot placed 0.3 m behind the first pair of photocells i.e., starting line athletes ran and changed direction as quickly as possible until crossing the second pair of photocells placed 20 m from the starting line .A study suggests a near perfect correlation between the COD (r=0.92)

  Change from Baseline at 6 weeks

• Squat jumps (SJ)

  In the SJ, a static position with a 90° knee flexion angle was maintained for 2 seconds before every jump attempt. No preparatory movement was allowed and an experienced researcher visually inspected for proper technique. A study suggested that jumping tests had high correlation coefficients with the principal component (r = 0.76-0.87.

  Change from Baseline at 6 weeks

• Countermovement Jump (CMJ)

  In the CMJ, athletes were instructed to perform a downward movement followed by a complete extension of the lower limbs and were allowed to freely determine the amplitude of the countermovement to avoid changes in their jumping coordination pattern. Participants were instructed to assume the same body position at takeoff and landing on both squat and counter movement jumps) the CMJ tests had a high correlation coefficient with the principal component (r=0.76-0.87)

  Change from Baseline at 6 weeks

• Horizontal Jump (HJ)

  The athlete stands behind a line marked on the ground with feet slightly apart. A two-foot take-off and landing is used, with swinging of the arms and bending of the knees to provide forward drive. The subject attempts to jump as far as possible, landing on both feet without falling backwards. Three attempts are allowed a study suggested a Horizontal jump assessment(r=-0.7-0.86)

  Change from Baseline at 6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Power training Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

with baseline intervention and power training interventions

Other: with baseline intervention and power training interventions

Baseline Group

OTHER

baseline interventions and without power training interventions

Other: baseline interventions and without power training interventions

Interventions

with baseline intervention and power training interventions OTHER

Group A (with power training ) was treated with * squats jump, * change of direction speed, * countermovement jump, * bench press, * Romanian deadlift * barbell squats, * resistance band sprints, * stair sprints * weighted sled pulls

Power training Group

baseline interventions and without power training interventions OTHER

Group B (without power training) was treated with * squats jump * change of direction speed * countermovement jump * barbell squats * resistance band sprints * stair sprints * Weighted sled pulls.

Baseline Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 40 Years
• Sex: male
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Male football players
• Age 18- 40 years
• BMI 18.5-25
• Being volunteered to participate in study
• Being engaged in practice from past 6th month

You may not qualify if:

• Athlete with current substance abuse
• Individual diagnose with severe anxiety disorder and psychosis
• History of previous fracture from last 6 months
• Musculoskeletal disorders (sprains, strains, tendinopathies, stress fracture)

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Sehat Medical Complex: lead

Study Sites (1)

Riphah International University

Lahore, Punjab Province, 44000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (9)

• Combs B, Fazeli PL, Brown DA, Gallagher S, Jones A, Romeo B, Heaton K. Description of the Nature of Musculoskeletal Shoulder Injuries in a Cohort of Commercial Truck Drivers: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Workplace Health Saf. 2021 Aug;69(8):375-382. doi: 10.1177/2165079921990364. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

  PMID: 33845688 BACKGROUND

• O'Brien L, Collins K, Amirabdollhian F. Exploring Sports Nutrition Knowledge in Elite Gaelic Footballers. Nutrients. 2021 Mar 26;13(4):1081. doi: 10.3390/nu13041081.

  PMID: 33810237 BACKGROUND

• Hasan S, Kandasamy G, Alyahya D, Alonazi A, Jamal A, Unnikrishnan R, Muthusamy H, Iqbal A. Effect of Resisted Sprint and Plyometric Training on Lower Limb Functional Performance in Collegiate Male Football Players: A Randomised Control Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136702.

  PMID: 34206346 BACKGROUND

• Gil S, Barroso R, Crivoi do Carmo E, Loturco I, Kobal R, Tricoli V, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H. Effects of resisted sprint training on sprinting ability and change of direction speed in professional soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2018 Sep;36(17):1923-1929. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1426346. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

  PMID: 29334309 BACKGROUND

• Pacholek M, Zemkova E. Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women's Football Players. Sports (Basel). 2020 Mar 30;8(4):42. doi: 10.3390/sports8040042.

  PMID: 32235425 BACKGROUND

• Altmann S, Ringhof S, Neumann R, Woll A, Rumpf MC. Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220982. eCollection 2019.

  PMID: 31412057 BACKGROUND

• Beato M, Bianchi M, Coratella G, Merlini M, Drust B. Effects of Plyometric and Directional Training on Speed and Jump Performance in Elite Youth Soccer Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb;32(2):289-296. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002371.

  PMID: 29176387 BACKGROUND

• Van Hooren B, Zolotarjova J. The Difference Between Countermovement and Squat Jump Performances: A Review of Underlying Mechanisms With Practical Applications. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):2011-2020. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001913.

  PMID: 28640774 BACKGROUND

• Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M. Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):551-5. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)182.0.CO;2.

  PMID: 15320660 BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• Imran Ghafoor

  Riphah International University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 19, 2023
• First Posted: November 27, 2023
• Study Start: August 23, 2023
• Primary Completion: March 30, 2024
• Study Completion: April 15, 2024
• Last Updated: May 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Locations

PA (1)