NCT06146023

Brief Summary

The goal of this preclinical trial is to learn about the benefits and limitations of novel robotic devices for microsurgery, based on different levels of microsurgical experience. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is robot-assisted microsurgery faster, better and more ergonomic than conventional microsurgery in a preclinical standardized setting? Participants will perform microvascular anastomoses on 1.0-mm-diameter artificial silicone vessels using a conventional manual approach versus a novel robot-assisted approach. Researchers will compare the performance of novices, advanced participants and experts to evaluate the role of microsurgical experience when learning the new technique.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 24, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 24, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

November 10, 2023

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Learning curveRoboticsSurgical ergonomicsSurgical training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Surgical time

    Time to perform anastomosis in minutes and seconds.

    Duration of anastomosis

  • Anastomosis quality

    Anastomosis lapse index (ALI) to evaluate the quality of each stitch. Score indicates absolute number of errors per anastomosis. Low values indicate better results.

    Evaluated right after completion of each anastomosis

  • Microsurgical skills

    Structured assessment of microsurgery skills (SAMS) to evaluate microsurgical skill acquisition. Score includes 8 items evaluated from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum). High values indicate better results.

    Duration of anastomosis

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Subjective Satisfaction

    Evaluated right after completion of each anastomosis

  • Surgical ergonomics

    Evaluated right after completion of each anastomosis

Study Arms (2)

Conventional

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional microsurgery with conventional microsurgical instruments and conventional surgical microscope

Procedure: Conventional anastomosis

Robotic

EXPERIMENTAL

Robot-assisted microsurgery with microsurgery robot and robotic microscope

Device: Robotic anastomosis (Symani surgical system and RoboticScope)

Interventions

Robot-assisted microvascular anastomosis on 1.0-mm-diameter silicone vessels using the Symani surgical system and RoboticScope

Robotic

Conventional microvascular anastomosis on 1.0-mm-diameter silicone vessels using conventional microsurgical instruments and conventional surgical microscope

Conventional

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Novices: no prior experience in microsurgery
  • Residents: 2-4 years of experience in microsurgery
  • Experts: at least 5 years of experience in microsurgery

You may not qualify if:

  • previous training with the robotic devices applied in this study
  • contraindications for usage of robotic devices (magnetic field)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States

Location

University Hospital Muenster

Münster, 48149, Germany

Location

Study Officials

  • Maximilian Kückelhaus, MD

    University Hospital Muenster

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Haripriya S Ayyala, MD

    Yale University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessors are blinded for participant groups and number of anastomosis during evaluation of scores.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Comparison of conventional manual microsurgery versus robot-assisted microsurgery
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2023

First Posted

November 24, 2023

Study Start

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion

July 1, 2023

Study Completion

July 1, 2023

Last Updated

November 24, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Primary data from this study can be made available upon request for dedicated purposes.

Locations