Performance of Robotic Microsurgery Systems
Preclinical Performance of The Combined Application of Two Robotic Systems in Microsurgery
1 other identifier
interventional
18
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this preclinical trial is to learn about the benefits and limitations of novel robotic devices for microsurgery, based on different levels of microsurgical experience. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is robot-assisted microsurgery faster, better and more ergonomic than conventional microsurgery in a preclinical standardized setting? Participants will perform microvascular anastomoses on 1.0-mm-diameter artificial silicone vessels using a conventional manual approach versus a novel robot-assisted approach. Researchers will compare the performance of novices, advanced participants and experts to evaluate the role of microsurgical experience when learning the new technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2023
CompletedNovember 24, 2023
November 1, 2023
9 months
November 10, 2023
November 16, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Surgical time
Time to perform anastomosis in minutes and seconds.
Duration of anastomosis
Anastomosis quality
Anastomosis lapse index (ALI) to evaluate the quality of each stitch. Score indicates absolute number of errors per anastomosis. Low values indicate better results.
Evaluated right after completion of each anastomosis
Microsurgical skills
Structured assessment of microsurgery skills (SAMS) to evaluate microsurgical skill acquisition. Score includes 8 items evaluated from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum). High values indicate better results.
Duration of anastomosis
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Subjective Satisfaction
Evaluated right after completion of each anastomosis
Surgical ergonomics
Evaluated right after completion of each anastomosis
Study Arms (2)
Conventional
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional microsurgery with conventional microsurgical instruments and conventional surgical microscope
Robotic
EXPERIMENTALRobot-assisted microsurgery with microsurgery robot and robotic microscope
Interventions
Robot-assisted microvascular anastomosis on 1.0-mm-diameter silicone vessels using the Symani surgical system and RoboticScope
Conventional microvascular anastomosis on 1.0-mm-diameter silicone vessels using conventional microsurgical instruments and conventional surgical microscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Novices: no prior experience in microsurgery
- Residents: 2-4 years of experience in microsurgery
- Experts: at least 5 years of experience in microsurgery
You may not qualify if:
- previous training with the robotic devices applied in this study
- contraindications for usage of robotic devices (magnetic field)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital Muensterlead
- Yale Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
University Hospital Muenster
Münster, 48149, Germany
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maximilian Kückelhaus, MD
University Hospital Muenster
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Haripriya S Ayyala, MD
Yale University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors are blinded for participant groups and number of anastomosis during evaluation of scores.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2023
First Posted
November 24, 2023
Study Start
October 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
November 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Primary data from this study can be made available upon request for dedicated purposes.