Study Stopped
The study was terminated early due to slower than expected recruitment and limited resources for further enrollment.
Two Modes of Mechanical Ventilation for Intensive Care Patients With Low Blood Oxygen Due to Breathing Difficulties
Transpulmonary Pressure During Volume Controlled Mechanical Ventilation Versus Airway Pressure Release Ventilation for Hypoxic Respiratory Failure - a Randomized Feasibility Study
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study examines individuals admitted to the intensive care unit due to breathing difficulties resulting in not getting enough oxygen into their bodies. These patient will receive mechanical ventilation and this study aims to determine how the pressure inside the lungs changes when using two different modes of mechanical ventilation. The goal is to improve management and care of breathing difficulties by gaining insight into changes in lung pressure during mechanical ventilation, as well as comparing the effectiveness of the two ventilator modes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 3, 2025
CompletedSeptember 19, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.7 years
October 2, 2023
September 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Median peak transpulmonary pressure
Measured with esophageal manometry in cmH20.
During the observation period; 1-6 hours after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Proportion of patients with peak transpulmonary pressure > 12 cmH2O
During observation period; 1-6 hours after randomization
Change in peak transpulmonary pressure in cmH20
During observation period; 1-6 hours after randomization
Fluctuations in transpulmonary pressure in cmH20
During observation period; 1-6 hours after randomization
Change in fluctuations of transpulmonary pressure in cmH20
During observation period; 1-6 hours after randomization
Nadir PaO2-to-FiO2 ratio
During observation period; 1-6 hours after randomization
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients unable to tolerate observation period without increasing ventilator settings
During observation period; 1-6 hours after randomization
Study Arms (2)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuration: 3 hours
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALDuration: 3 hours
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Admitted to the ICU
- Invasive mechanical ventilation with FiO2 ≥ 50% OR PaO2-to-FiO2 ratio \<20 kPa, including PEEP 3 5 cmH20 for at least 6 hours
You may not qualify if:
- Severe bronchospasm, defined as warranting treatment aimed at reversing this i.e. inhalation of anticholinergic or bronchodilator beyond what the patient normally use
- Emphysema where treating physician judges the patient at increased risk for pneumothorax from APRV
- Restrictive lung disease defined as a pre-admission diagnosis of restrictive lung disease
- Undrained pneumothorax
- Hemodynamic instability defined as more than 0.20 microgram/kg/min of norepinephrine or any dose of adrenaline infusion to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg
- Age \< 18 years
- Patients who have received APRV previously during the current ICU admission
- Patients in prone position within the last 24 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, 2400, Denmark
Hvidovre Hospital
Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Theis S Itenov, MD, PhD
University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Sponsor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2023
First Posted
November 18, 2023
Study Start
December 8, 2023
Primary Completion
August 3, 2025
Study Completion
September 3, 2025
Last Updated
September 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- A year after publication of the primary outcome data
- Access Criteria
- By written request to the steering committee. The sharing of data must be subject to a written agreement between the Capital Region of Denmark and receiver, and in accordance with data regulations. The steering committe will ensure that this.
All data will be owned by the steering committee. De-identified data will be made available 1 year after the primary publication of the outcome data. The statistical code will be submitted as an appendix to primary publication.