Comparative Analysis of Two Animal-derived ADMs in Irradiated Implant-based Reconstruction
RTADM
Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Risk Profile of Two Animal-derived Acellular Dermal Matrices in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy, Radiotherapy and Implant-based Reconstruction
1 other identifier
observational
146
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this retrospective observational trial is to compare two different devices, used in implant-based breast reconstruction, called acellular dermal matrices, which are a sort of collagen patch that integrates with the tissues of the patient and helps in contrasting the collateral effects of radiotherapy (capsular contracture, implant loss) The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- is one of the two matrices better than the other? (better results with fewer complications)
- is there a group of patients who benefit more than another from the use of this type of devices?
- is there an adm which works better in one specific subgroup of patients? Participants have undergone mastectomy, radiotherapy and implant reconstruction with the aid of two different kinds of acellular dermal matrices. Researchers will compare patients who receive the porcine-derived adm and the patients who receive bovine-derived adm to see if there is a difference in terms of capsular contracture reduction, aestethic result and complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2023
CompletedDecember 13, 2023
October 1, 2023
5.6 years
November 15, 2023
December 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ADM efficacy and risk profile comparison
Does one dermal matrix perform better than the other in terms of efficacy and complication rates?
60 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Best clinical setting for ADM use
60 months
Other Outcomes (1)
ADM comparison in each clinical setting group
60 months
Study Arms (8)
POST QUART NATIVE
Native adm used in the setting of mastectomy and implant reconstruction after QUART
POST QUART VERITAS
Veritas adm used in the setting of mastectomy and implant reconstruction after QUART
POST EXPANDER NATIVE
Native adm used in the setting of expander removal and implant positioning after mastectomy + RT
POST EXPANDER VERITAS
Veritas adm used in the setting of expander removal and implant positioning after mastectomy + RT
IMPLANT EXCHANGE NATIVE
Native adm used in the setting of implant exchange after mastectomy + RT
IMPLANT EXCHANGE VERITAS
Veritas adm used in the setting of implant exchange after mastectomy + RT
IMPANT EXCHANGE AFTER QUART NATIVE
Native adm used in the setting of implant exchange after QUART+ Mastectomy and implant reconstruction
IMPLANT EXCHANGE AFTER QUART VERITAS
Veritas adm used in the setting of implant exchange after QUART+ Mastectomy and implant reconstruction
Interventions
acellular dermal matrix implant in implant-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
The study focuses on female patients undergoing implant based reconstruction after radiotherapy assisted by the use of an acellular dermal matrix.
You may qualify if:
- at least 6 months follow up
- breast reconstruction with implant + acellular dermal matrix after mastectomy and radiotherapy
You may not qualify if:
- mastectomy flap \<1 cm
- autoimmune disease
- prolonged use of corticosteroids
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
European Institute of Oncology
Milan, Lombardy, 20141, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, MD
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2023
First Posted
November 18, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
October 13, 2023
Last Updated
December 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10