Comparing Tunnel Technique and CAF With CTG in Mandibular Gingival Recession Treatment
Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Mandibular Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of two different surgical techniques, the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) and the Tunnel Technique (TT) with Connective Tissue Grafts (CTG), in treating mandibular gingival recession. This study, focusing on healthy patients with RT1 and RT2 gingival recessions, aims to determine which surgical approach offers better root coverage for mandibular recession defects. Additionally, it seeks to understand the effects of these techniques on aspects such as keratinized tissue gain, vestibular depth, gingival thickness, and patient-reported outcomes. Participants in this trial will undergo one of the two surgical procedures and are expected to attend a total of six assessment visits. Researchers will compare the results from both groups, those treated with CAF and those with TT+CTG, to discern if one method is superior in achieving more effective root coverage, enhanced aesthetic appearance, and reduced discomfort associated with gingival recession.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2025
CompletedMarch 8, 2024
March 1, 2024
1.3 years
November 12, 2023
March 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Root Coverage (MRC)
he Mean Root Coverage measures the percentage of exposed tooth root that has been covered by gum tissue after surgery, compared to before the treatment.
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Vestibular depth (VD)
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
Complete Root Coverage (CRC)
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
change in Keratinized Tissue Width (KT)
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
change in gingival thickness (GT)
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
Study Arms (2)
CAF + CTG
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm involves patients treated with the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) technique, a recognized method for treating gingival recession. As an active comparator, this arm serves to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of CAF against the alternative surgical method used in the study.
Tunnel Technique + CTG
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm receive the Tunnel Technique (TT) with Connective Tissue Grafts (CTG). Also an established method for gingival recession treatment, this arm acts as an active comparator to assess and compare the effectiveness of TT+CTG against the CAF technique.
Interventions
Surgical techniques for mandibular gingival recession: coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft. Participants undergo initial evaluations, including periodontal exams and digital imaging, followed by standardized pre-operative preparations. Post-surgery, uniform care includes pain management and oral hygiene instructions, with follow-ups to monitor healing and assess outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes, like root coverage and patient-reported satisfaction, are consistently measured across groups. Standardized data collection and analysis procedures ensure reliable, comparable results, facilitating an effective comparison of the surgical methods' efficacy.
Surgical techniques for mandibular gingival recession: tunnel technique + connective tissue graft. Participants undergo initial evaluations, including periodontal exams and digital imaging, followed by standardized pre-operative preparations. Post-surgery, uniform care includes pain management and oral hygiene instructions, with follow-ups to monitor healing and assess outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes, like root coverage and patient-reported satisfaction, are consistently measured across groups. Standardized data collection and analysis procedures ensure reliable, comparable results, facilitating an effective comparison of the surgical methods' efficacy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥18 years; periodontally and systemically healthy
- presence of RT1 and RT2 gingival recession defects
- recession in the mandibular arch
- recession ≥ 2mm in depth at the buccal aspect
- full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤ 20%
- no previous periodontal surgery
- presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) (a step ≤1mm at the CEJ and/or presence of root abrasion, but with identifiable CEJ, will be accepted).
You may not qualify if:
- smokers ≥10 cigarettes a day
- contraindications for periodontal surgery
- medications known to affect the gingiva or interfere with wound healing
- pregnancy
- active orthodontic therapy
- caries or restorations in the area to be treated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UIC Barcelona - Clinica Universitaria de Odontologia
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, 08195, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506.
PMID: 11022782BACKGROUNDCairo F, Nieri M, Cattabriga M, Cortellini P, De Paoli S, De Sanctis M, Fonzar A, Francetti L, Merli M, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Trombelli L, Zucchelli G, Pini-Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score after treatment of gingival recession: an interrater agreement multicenter study. J Periodontol. 2010 Dec;81(12):1752-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100278. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
PMID: 20629546RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gonzalo Blasi, DDS MS
UIC Barcelona
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Head Staff
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2023
First Posted
November 18, 2023
Study Start
December 11, 2023
Primary Completion
April 10, 2025
Study Completion
June 10, 2025
Last Updated
March 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share