NCT06132607

Brief Summary

Preoperative three-dimensional (3D) lung reconstructions can reduce intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate, and operation duration. Commercial products predominantly provide these 3D reconstructions, hence the aim of this study was to assess the usability and performance of preoperative 3D lung reconstructions created with open-source software.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 21, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 13, 2023

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 4, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 31, 2023

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 15, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

video-assisted thoracoscopic surgerylung cancerthree-dimensional reconstructionthree-dimensional simulationopen-source software

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • System Usability Score

    System Usability Score Questionnaire. This questionnaire includes 10 statements rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The even-numbered questions contributed to the scale position 5 minus the scale position, while the odd-numbered questions contributed to the scale position minus 1. The final score was calculated by the sum of the even and uneven-numbered questions, multiplied by 2.5. The minimum system usability score is 0 and the maximum is 100. A system usability score above 68 is considered above average.

    Single-point evaluation after surgery (at day 0)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Segmental lung nodule location

    Baseline and during surgery (at day 0)

  • Number of arteries to target lobe or segment

    Baseline and during surgery (at day 0)

  • Anatomical variations

    Baseline and during surgery (at day 0)

  • Potential change of surgery or surgical plan

    Single-point evaluation after surgery (at day 0)

  • Intraoperative use of 3D lung reconstruction

    Single-point evaluation after surgery (at day 0)

Study Arms (1)

Preoperative 3D lung reconstruction

Patients who were planned for an anatomical lung resection with preoperative 3D lung reconstruction from CT images

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients referred for a segmentectomy or lobectomy

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with suspected or biopsy-proven lung cancer scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery for lobectomy or segmentectomy

You may not qualify if:

  • Computed Tomography scan contained motion artifacts
  • Surgery was canceled
  • Planned surgery changed intraoperatively to another procedure
  • Patients who did not provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zuyderland Medical Center

Heerlen, Limburg, 6419PC, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 2005;4:287-91.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lewis JR, Sauro J. Item benchmarks for the system usability scale. J Usability Stud 2018;13.

    BACKGROUND
  • Brooke J. SUS: a 'quick and dirty' usability. Usability Eval Ind 1996;189:189-94.

    BACKGROUND
  • Laven IEWG, Oosterhoff VPS, Franssen AJPM, van Roozendaal LM, Hulsewe KWE, Vissers YLJ, de Loos ER. Evaluating three-dimensional lung reconstructions for thoracoscopic lung resections using open-source software: a pilot study. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 30;13(7):1595-1608. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-134. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Erik de Loos, PhD

    Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Thoracic surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2023

First Posted

November 15, 2023

Study Start

December 21, 2022

Primary Completion

March 13, 2023

Study Completion

April 4, 2023

Last Updated

March 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, ER de Loos, upon reasonable request.

Locations