A PSM Analysis to Evaluate Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation for PPI
Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation Versus Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Plus Transanal Electrical Stimulation for Post-Radical Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
1 other identifier
observational
389
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this propensity score matching study is to compare the posttreatment outcomes of post-radical prostatectomy Incontinence patients undergoing either electrical pudendal nerve stimulation or pelvic floor muscle training combined with transanal electrical stimulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedJune 13, 2025
August 1, 2023
1 year
November 5, 2023
June 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form score (ICIQ-SF)
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) is a validated and widely used questionnaire to assess and measure the impact of urinary incontinence on an individual's quality of life. This part includes a set of simple questions related to urinary incontinence symptoms, which the individual answers. The questions address the type and frequency of incontinence episodes, as well as their impact on daily life. The higher the score, the more severe the condition.
T0 (baseline); T1 (day after 24th treatment); T2 (day after 36th treatment); T3 (day after 48th treatment); T4 (day after 60th treatment); T5 (day after 72nd treatment).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pad-counting Score
T0 (baseline); T1 (day after 24th treatment); T2 (day after 36th treatment); T3 (day after 48th treatment); T4 (day after 60th treatment); T5 (day after 72nd treatment).
Study Arms (2)
Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation Group
Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Group
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Plus Transanal Electrical Stimulation
Interventions
The patient was positioned prone post-micturition. Long needles (0.40 Х 100 mm) were inserted perpendicularly, 1 cm bilateral to the sacrococcygeal joint, to a depth of 80-90 mm, eliciting sensations referred to the urethra or anus. The lower points, 1 cm bilateral to the coccyx tip, received oblique insertion of longer needles (0.40 Х 125 mm) toward the ischiorectal fossa (90-110 mm depth), inducing sensations precisely to the urethra. Connected to a G6805-2 Multi-Purpose Health Device, the ipsilateral needles created an electric loop, with the upper as anode and lower as cathode. Direct electrical stimulation (2.5 Hz, 25\~35 mA) for 45 minutes targeted the pudendal nerve, thrice weekly for a minimum of 8 weeks. The treatment plan remains ongoing until the patient opts to discontinue voluntarily.
Electromyogram BF-assisted PFMT (using a nerve function reconstruction treatment system \[AM1000B; Shenzhen Creative Industry Co. Ltd, China\]) and following TES (using a neuromuscular stimulation therapy system (PHENIX USB 4, Electronic Concept Lignon Innovation, France)) at a current intensity of \< 60 mA (as high as possible to get a PFM contraction) and frequencies of 15 Hz and 85 Hz (alternate 3-minute periods of stimulation) were performed by a specially trained therapist, 20 minutes each time, respectively (a total of 40 minutes), 3 times a week for a total of 8 weeks. The patients also conducted 30 maximal high-intensity PFM contractions for 2-6 seconds (with 2-6 seconds rest), 3 sessions every day at home for a total of 8 weeks. If the patient is willing, the treatment plan can continue until the patient voluntarily decides to stop.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged between 18-80 with post-radical prostatectomy incontinence treated at 3 tertiary academic medical centers between 2012 and 2020 were retrieved.
You may qualify if:
- Onset of urinary incontinence at least 1 month post-RP
- Minimum two documented incontinence episodes per week in a 7-day bladder diary
- Pathological confirmation of no residual cancer post-RP
You may not qualify if:
- High pathological risk factors (e.g., lymph node metastasis, resection margin involvement, bulky tumors)
- Preoperative incontinence
- Prior anticholinergic treatment
- Urinary tract infection or hematuria
- Postvoid residual volume exceeding 100 ml (determined by bladder ultrasound)
- Neurological disorders
- Urethral stricture
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai research institute of acupuncture and meridian
Shanghai, 200030, China
Related Publications (1)
Li T, Wang S, Chen Q, Lv T, Huang Z. Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation versus pelvic floor muscle training with transrectal electrical stimulation for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a cohort study. Sci Rep. 2025 Nov 24;15(1):41603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-25567-3.
PMID: 41286037DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Siyou Wang
Shanghai research institute of acupuncture and meridian
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2023
First Posted
November 14, 2023
Study Start
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
June 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-08