NCT06127316

Brief Summary

Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) and unloading ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) have shown varying levels of success in reducing forces acting on different regions of the bottom of the foot during gait. CDOs and unloading AFOs have shown differing offloading capabilities across different regions of the foots (hindfoot, midfoot, forefoot) which may be related to a distinct difference between CDOs and unloading AFOs: CDOs do not suspend, or distract, the foot away from the footplate. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of CDOs and heel distraction height (the distance between the heel and the footplate) on limb loading and motion during gait as well as patient reported pain, and comfort.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Aug 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress96%
Aug 2024Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2023

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 13, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 16, 2024

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 15, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Plantar ForceAnkle Foot OrthosisCarbon Fiber OrthosisBiomechanics

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Peak Force (forefoot)

    Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

    Baseline

  • Force Impulse (forefoot)

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

    Baseline

  • Peak Force (hindfoot)

    Plantar forces (N) will be measured across the hindfoot (proximal 30% sensor) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

    Baseline

  • Force Impulse (hindfoot)

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the hindfoot (proximal 30% sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

    Baseline

  • Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable

    Baseline

  • Modified Socket Comfort Score

    Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable, and from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Peak Force (total foot)

    Baseline

  • Force Impulse (total foot)

    Baseline

  • Peak Force (midfoot)

    Baseline

  • Force Impulse (midfoot)

    Baseline

  • Ankle Range of Motion

    Baseline

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Semi-Structured Interview

    Baseline

Study Arms (4)

NoCDO

NO INTERVENTION

Participants will complete study activities without a CDO

0cm Distraction

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO with 0cm of heel distraction height

Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

1cm Distraction

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO with 1cm of heel distraction height

Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

2cm Distraction

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO with 2cm of heel distraction height

Device: Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Interventions

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) used in this study will consist of a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, a carbon fiber posterior strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee. The CDO will be modular in design which will allow three carbon fiber struts of the same stiffness and differing lengths to be used to implement 0cm, 1cm, and 2cm levels of heel distraction height. A longer posterior strut will move the carbon fiber footplate away from the participants foot to create the heel distraction height.

Also known as: Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)
0cm Distraction1cm Distraction2cm Distraction

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ages 18-65 years
  • Traumatic hindfoot injury (soft tissue injury or fracture affecting the hindfoot or ankle)
  • Mechanical pain with limb loading (\>=4/10 on Numerical Pain Rating Scale)
  • Ability to walk 50 feet at a slow to moderate pace
  • Ability to walk without a cane or crutch
  • Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis with a moderate or severe brain injury
  • Diagnosis with a physical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (e.g., cardiac condition, clotting disorder, pulmonary condition, etc.
  • Ankle weakness resulting from spinal cord injury or central nervous system pathology
  • Nerve, muscle, bone, or other condition limiting function in the contralateral extremity
  • Rheumatoid or inflammatory arthritis
  • Necrosis of any bones in the foot or ankle
  • Pain of 8/10 or greater during walking
  • Uncorrected visual or hearing impairments
  • Require use of a knee stabilizing device to perform daily activities (i.e., Knee ankle foot orthosis, knee orthosis, etc.)
  • Pregnancy
  • Body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Jason M Wilken, PT,PhD

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD

CONTACT

Kirsten M Anderson, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants will be blinded, to the greatest extent possible, to the different CDO heel distraction heights.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: In this study, forces acting under the foot (hindfoot, midfoot, forefoot, and total foot) will be measured using wireless Loadsol insoles (Novel GMBH, St. Paul, MN) as participants walk without an orthosis (NoCDO) and with a CDO with three different posterior strut lengths resulting in three different levels of heel distraction (0cm, 1cm, 2cm) at self-selected and controlled speeds. Gait kinematics and kinetics will be measured using infra-red motion capture cameras (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., Denver, CO) and force plates (AMTI, Watertown, MA). Testing order of the CDO conditions will be randomized to prevent influence of testing order.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2023

First Posted

November 13, 2023

Study Start

August 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations