Effects of Altitude-like Cognition Training on Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Functions
ALTIBRAIN
Altitude-like Cognition Training to Target Brain Erythropoietin as a Novel Mechanism of Long-lasting Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Functions
2 other identifiers
interventional
190
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effects of a three-week altitude-like cognition training intervention in healthy individuals (substudy 1) and symptomatically stable patients with mood disorders (depression or bipolar disorder; substudy 2). This multi-modal intervention consists of an adaptive cognitive training programme that participants complete while they're inside an altitude-training room with 12% O2, corresponding to 4400 meters altitude. Across substudy 1 and 2, the investigators hypothesize that altitude-like cognition training has a beneficial effect on cognition after three-weeks treatment completion measured with a global cognition composite score (primary outcome measure). Further, the investigators hypothesize that hypoxia and cognition training will yield improved executive functioning after treatment completion and changes in brain activity during working memory in the dorsal prefrontal cortex 4 weeks after treatment completion (secondary outcome measures). In the patient study, the investigators further hypothesize that the intervention will have beneficial effects on daily-life cognition measured in virtual reality (VR) 4 weeks after treatment completion (secondary outcome measure in substudy 2). For exploratory purposes, the study will examine effects on additional measures of cognition, functioning and self-ratings scales (tertiary outcomes). The investigators will compare the combination of altitude-like hypoxia (12%) and cognitive training with (1) hypoxia with no training, (2) cognitive training under normal oxygen levels (normoxia; 20%), and (3) normoxia with no training in healthy individuals (substudy 1). For patients with mood disorders (substudy 2) the effects of altitude-like hypoxia (12%) and cognitive training are compared to treatment as usual (TAU).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2025
CompletedSeptember 26, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.4 years
October 31, 2023
September 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cognitive composite score
A cognitive composite based on an average of Z-transformed scores from the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding, verbal fluency with the letter "D", WAIS-III Letter-Number Sequencing, Trail Making Test B (TMT B) and Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) speed for correct responses from Cambridge Cognition (CANTAB). No score range. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment. Primary outcome assessement time point), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
"Mean choices to correct" in One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (OTS) from Cambridge Cognition (CANTAB)
Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment. Secondary outcome assessement time point), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Dorsal prefrontal cortex activity during spatial N-back
Baseline, week 8
ONLY IN PATIENTS (SUBSTUDY 2): Cognition Assessement in Virtual Reality (CAVIR) test: Composite score
Baseline, week 8 (secondary outcome assessment time point) (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Other Outcomes (20)
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Trail Making Test Part A
Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Trail Making Test Part B
Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
- +17 more other outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Altitude-like hypoxia (12%) combined with cognitive training
EXPERIMENTALParticipants breathe 12% ambient oxygen in an altitude-training room, 3.5 hours daily, 5-6 days per week for 3 weeks. On iPads, they perform cognitive training, which is interleaved by short breaks.
Altitude-like hypoxia (12%) with no training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants breathe 12% ambient oxygen in an altitude-training room, 3.5 hours daily, 6 days per week for 3 weeks. On iPads, they perform matched control games without cognitive benefits, which is interleaved by short breaks.
Normoxia (20%) combined with cognitive training
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants breathe 20% ambient oxygen in an altitude-training room, 3.5 hours daily, 6 days per week for 3 weeks. On iPads, they perform cognitive training, which is interleaved by short breaks.
Normoxia (20%) combined with no training
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants breathe 20% ambient oxygen in an altitude-training room, 3.5 hours daily, 6 days per week for 3 weeks. On iPads, they perform matched control games without cognitive benefits, which is interleaved by short breaks.
Treatment as usual
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants receive no additional care or intervention between baseline and end-of-treatment assessment points.
Interventions
Fresh air with 12% O2, is blown into a sealed 20 m³ room by a 4kW air compressor with a safety-approved system developed by HöhenBalance, Austria. After participants enter the room, the O2 levels will be reduced from 16% to 12% (≈ 4,400 meters altitude) in a 30 minutes lead-in phase. The target O2 level of 12% will be maintained over three hours
Fresh air with 20% O2, is blown into a sealed 20 m³ room by a 4kW air compressor with a safety-approved system developed by HöhenBalance, Austria. The target O2 level of 20% will be maintained over 3.5 hours
The web-based cognitive training (Happy Neuron Pro) is grounded on principles of neuroplasticity-based learning by being intensive, neuroadaptive, engaging and rewarding. The active training involves parametric task adjustment by decreasing stimuli presentation time, increasing working memory load, decreasing time to respond, and increasing the number of non-target items (distractors).
Participants in the no training control condition receive computer games similar to Happy Neuron Pro but with low cognitive demand that produce no cognitive benefits. Specifically, this sham procedure involves the exact same stimuli as the active condition but with changes from trial to trial only in the appearance of the tasks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years
- No psychiatric history
- Fluency in Danish
- years
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder or depression confirmed with the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)
- Fluency in Danish
- Partial or full remission (defined as a score of ≤14 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items (HDRS-17) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
- Objectively-verified cognitive impairment according to Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) and/or self-reported cognitive impairment measured with Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar disorder Rating Assessment (COBRA). For SCIP, their performance must be ≥0.5 standard deviations (SD) below their demographically adjusted expected total SCIP score or on minimum 2 SCIP subtest scores. For COBRA, patients must report substantial cognitive impairment defined as a score ≥14.
You may not qualify if:
- Schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
- Neurological disorder
- Alcohol or substance abuse
- History of serious head trauma
- Previous altitude sickness
- Heart disease
- Diabetes
- Renal failure
- Untreated/insufficiently treated hypertension
- Thromboses or thromboembolic events
- First-degree family with thromboembolic events before age 60
- Pregnancy
- Breastfeeding
- Smoking or use other nicotine products regularly
- BMI\>30
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitallead
- European Research Councilcollaborator
- University of Copenhagencollaborator
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Neurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, University of Copenhagen and Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg hospital
Copenhagen, Capital Region of Copenhagen, 1353, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Miskowiak KW, Damgaard V, Schandorff JM, Macoveanu J, Knudsen GM, Johansen A, Plaven-Sigray P, Svarer C, Fussing CB, Cramer K, Jorgensen MB, Kessing LV, Ehrenreich H. Effects of cognitive training under hypoxia on cognitive proficiency and neuroplasticity in remitted patients with mood disorders and healthy individuals: ALTIBRAIN study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Oct 3;25(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08463-5.
PMID: 39363230DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kamilla W Miskowiak, DMSc, DPhil
Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Substudy 1: The study has a double-blinded design. Neither the participant nor the outcome assessors will know whether the participant is receiving (1) altitude-like hypoxia (12%) combined with cognitive training, (2) hypoxia with no training, (3) cognitive training under normoxia (20%), or (4) normoxia with no training. Substudy 2: The study has an assessor-blinded design. The outcome assessor will not know whether the participant is receiving (1) altitude-like hypoxia (12%) combined with cognitive training or (2) treatment as usual (TAU).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2023
First Posted
November 7, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2023
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 30, 2025
Last Updated
September 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share