Point of Care Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Diagnostics of Respiratory Tract Infections in General Practice
A Cluster-randomized Trial of Point-of-care PCR Diagnostics of Respiratory Tract Infections in General Practice
1 other identifier
interventional
5,700
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study will assess the effect and cost-effectiveness of the availability of point-of-care (POC) PCR testing, in respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in general practice, compared with usual care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 22, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2026
CompletedJuly 31, 2025
July 1, 2025
2.4 years
June 26, 2023
July 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction of respiratory tract infections (RTI) patients' re-contacts to General Practitioners
The primary outcome measure is change in the number of re-contacts within a time period of 7 days from initial contact for each patient consulting with a clinic for a RTI in the intervention period compared to the control period. The re-contacts include any daytime contacts to general practice and are based on data from the national Danish registries. RTI patients may present themselves with symptoms often associated with RTI, e.g., fever, cough, sore throat etc., but it is up to the treating clinician to categorize patients as having a RTI. Each time period (i.e., intervention and control) consists of 7 weeks.
2 x 7 weeks of trial = 14 weeks in total (exclusive crossover)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change in number of hospital admission and deaths
Within a time period of 14 days from initial contact for a respiratory tract infection
Change in number of redeemed antibiotic prescriptions
Within a time period of 7 days from initial contact for a respiratory tract infection
Effect of POC PCR in general practice on patient satisfaction based on patient satisfaction questionnaires.
On the initial contact for RTI (baseline)
Effect of POC PCR in general practice on GP satisfaction based on GP satisfaction questionnaires
At the end of trial (through study completion, an average of 23 weeks)
Total treatment costs 28 days from the initial contact for RTIs based on data from Danish national registers
28 days from the initial contact for RTI
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
POC PCR-test device
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the seven-week intervention, the Point-of-Care PCR-testing device will be made available for approximate 50 clinics. Besides the general instructions on how to include patients, clinics in the intervention arm will be instructed that it is entirely up to the GP whether or not to use the PCR-testing device on each individual patient. In addition, no specific instructions on medical treatments or follow up procedures are made.
Standard testing
NO INTERVENTIONIn the seven-week control period, the Point-of-Care PCR-testing device will not be available in approximately 50 clinics. Patients attended by the GP during control periods will receive treatment as usual. Like GPs in the intervention arm, GPs in the control arm are not actively encouraged to change their prescription patterns, but they must record data from patients with respiratory tract infections parallel to the intervention group.
Interventions
The analysis will follow an intention-to-treat principle, that is, contacts in the intervention period will be analyzed as randomized, regardless of whether the POC PCR test was actually performed for a given contact. As sensitivity analysis, the data will be analyzed in a "per-protocol" spirit, defining the intervention at the contact level as a POC PCR test performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- GP clinics are eligible for participation when they have a clinic provider number ("ydernummer").
- Any patient with symptoms of RTI independent of age, gender, socioeconomic factors are eligible for POC PCR testing, if the GP finds it clinically relevant.
- Questionnaire data will be collected from patients ≥15 years old, parents/caregivers to patients ˂15 years and GPs.
- Qualitative data will be collected from consenting patients and/or parents/caregivers to patients \<15 years and healthcare staff
You may not qualify if:
- \- Questionnaire data of participants below 15 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Southern Denmarklead
- Roche Diagnostics GmbHcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Research Unit of General Practice, Dept. of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark
Odense C, 5000, Denmark
Related Publications (10)
Jose BP, Camargos PA, Cruz Filho AA, Correa Rde A. Diagnostic accuracy of respiratory diseases in primary health units. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2014 Nov-Dec;60(6):599-612. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.60.06.021.
PMID: 25650863BACKGROUNDVedsted P OF. Almen praksis' funktion og roller. 1 ed. Ehrenreich B MR, Vedsted P, editor. København: Munksgaard; 2011.
BACKGROUNDCohen JF, Pauchard JY, Hjelm N, Cohen R, Chalumeau M. Efficacy and safety of rapid tests to guide antibiotic prescriptions for sore throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD012431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012431.pub2.
PMID: 32497279BACKGROUNDPottegard A, Olesen M, Christensen B, Christensen MB, Hallas J, Rasmussen L. Who prescribes drugs to patients: A Danish register-based study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;87(7):2982-2987. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14691. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
PMID: 33496033BACKGROUNDOrganization. WH. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva:. World Health Organization; 2015.
BACKGROUNDAI RNM. Improving efficiency in cluster-randomized study design and implementation: taking advantage of a crossover. Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials. 2014;6:11-5.
BACKGROUNDMoore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
PMID: 25791983BACKGROUNDFoundation. ER. EQ-5D-Y User Guide. 2020.
BACKGROUNDThygesen LC, Daasnes C, Thaulow I, Bronnum-Hansen H. Introduction to Danish (nationwide) registers on health and social issues: structure, access, legislation, and archiving. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):12-6. doi: 10.1177/1403494811399956.
PMID: 21898916BACKGROUNDBalasubramaniam K, Simonsen LM, Kongstad LP, Thilsing T, Wehberg S, Hallas J, Sopina L, Nielsen JB, Overbeck G, Hvidt EA, Jarbol DE, Rasmussen TL, Sondergaard J. Evaluating the Effect of a Molecular Point-of-Care Test on Acute Respiratory Infections in General Practice: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 8;14:e72842. doi: 10.2196/72842.
PMID: 40921063DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jens Søndergaard, MD, PhD, GP
University of Southern Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2023
First Posted
November 7, 2023
Study Start
October 30, 2023
Primary Completion
March 22, 2026
Study Completion
March 22, 2026
Last Updated
July 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share