Implant-based Breast Reconstruction and Mastectomy With Fat Grafting After Breast Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy
Immediate Tissue Expander and Lipofilling After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Recurrence Following Lumpectomy and Irradiation: Retrospective Multicentric Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
163
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Higher rates of complications and poorer cosmetic outcomes have been reported after salvage mastectomy and implant-based versus autologous reconstruction in patients previously exposed to radiation therapy (i) on the breast as adjuvant treatment after breast conserving surgery (BCS) or (ii) on thoracic wall for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). Nevertheless, selected patients with favourable preoperative soft-tissue assessment may benefit from alloplastic reconstruction and fat grafting that has been suggested as an effective technique to promote the regeneration of irradiated tissues. The aims of this study are to assess:
- 1.the feasibility of implant-based breast reconstruction and fat grafting after mastectomy (simple mastectomy, nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy)
- 2.oncological safety of implant-based breast reconstruction and fat grafting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Jun 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedMarch 8, 2024
October 1, 2023
16.5 years
October 30, 2023
March 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Complication rates after stage I and II
Identification of complication rates after stage I and II, measuring percentage of complications (pain and patient discomfort, partial necrosis of mastectomy flaps, nipple-areolar necrosis, delayed wound healing, capsular contracture, bleeding, expander or implant exposition, infection, expander rupture, re-operations, reconstruction failures) over the total number of surgical procedures of stage I and II.
1 month, 6 months and 12 months
Patient's satisfaction
Self-assessed patient reports for identification of patient's satisfaction, measuring percentage of patients that were satisfied with results overall.
12 months
Cosmetic outcomes
Clinical and photography-based assessments for cosmetic outcomes measurement graded by a plastic breast surgeon as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor.
1 month, 6 months and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Oncological safety of implant-based breast reconstruction and fat grafting.
5 years
Study Arms (1)
Immediate tissue expander and fat grafting after mastectomy
EXPERIMENTALPatients underwent simple mastectomy, skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based, two-stage breast reconstruction: contextual mastectomy and expander positioning were performed during first stage (stage I) while substitution of the expander with definitive implant occurred during second stage (stage II). Fat grafting with regenerative intent was performed during stage I or between stage I and II. Adipose tissue was harvested from the abdomen, flanks, trochanter regions, inner thigh and medial aspect of knees. Fat was injected in the subfascial plane of the pectoralis major muscle with blunt cannula in order to avoid thrombo-embolic risks. At least six months after stage I patients underwent expander substitution with definitive implant and contralateral mammoplasty when required. In case of complications that required removal of the implant, autologous reconstruction was performed.
Interventions
Implant-based breast reconstruction and fat grafting after salvage or prophylactic mastectomy in patients previously exposed to radiation therapy on the breast as adjuvant treatment after breast conserving surgery (BCS) or on thoracic wall for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients candidate to mastectomy (salvage mastectomy for breast cancer recurrence or prophylactic mastectomy) who had been irradiated as adjuvant treatment after breast conserving surgery or as treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma
- signed informed consent to participate and to implant-based breast reconstruction
- absence of distant metastases or other malignancies.
You may not qualify if:
- \- presence of distant metastases or other malignancies.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital
Forlì, 47121, Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, 20133, Italy
Related Publications (7)
Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, Cederna P, Goldfarb S, Vicini FA, Pierce LJ. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Mar 1;49(3):713-21. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01402-4.
PMID: 11172953RESULTDickson MG, Sharpe DT, Dickson WA, Wilde GP, Brennan TG, Roberts AH. Breast reconstruction by tissue expansion. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987 Jan;69(1):19-21.
PMID: 3566111RESULTManyam BV, Shah C, Woody NM, Reddy CA, Weller MA, Juloori A, Naik M, Valente S, Grobmyer S, Durand P, Djohan R, Tendulkar RD. Long-Term Outcomes After Autologous or Tissue Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiation for Breast Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov;9(6):e497-e505. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
PMID: 31238166RESULTKhansa I, Boehmler JH 4th. Aesthetic outcomes in women undergoing breast-conserving therapy followed by mastectomy and microsurgical reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2015 Jan;35(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/micr.22225. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
PMID: 24449018RESULTDebald M, Pech T, Kaiser C, Keyver-Paik MD, Walgenbach-Bruenagel G, Kalff JC, Kuhn W, Walgenbach KJ. Lipofilling effects after breast cancer surgery in post-radiation patients: an analysis of results and algorithm proposal. Eur J Plast Surg. 2017;40(5):447-454. doi: 10.1007/s00238-017-1311-1. Epub 2017 May 29.
PMID: 28989237RESULTSalgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Fat grafting and breast reconstruction with implant: another option for irradiated breast cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):317-329. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6619.
PMID: 21987041RESULTColeman SR, Saboeiro AP. Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):775-85; discussion 786-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252001.59162.c9.
PMID: 17312477RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chiara Listorti, MD
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Secondo Folli, MD
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2023
First Posted
November 7, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
March 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-10