NCT06116539

Brief Summary

Periodontal plastic surgery has been performed successfully for a long time in the treatment of gingival recessions and mucogingival defects. Epithelial and connective tissue grafts are considered the "gold standard" treatment for gingival recession due to their biocompatibility and long-term stability, however they require tissue harvesting from a donor area, usually the palate, increasing patient discomfort. Various hemostatic and healing agents have been used in conjunction with suturing to speed healing and reduce complications associated with this procedure, such as bleeding and pain. These include absorbable synthetic collagen, absorbable gelatin sponges, oxidized regenerated cellulose, ferric subsulfate, and more recently, cyanoacrylate cements and platelet-rich fibrin. Cyanoacrylate adhesives are synthesized as monomers by condensation of a cyanoacetate with formaldehyde in the presence of catalysts and the adhesive film is developed by rapid polymerization caused by hydroxide groups to the surfaces to be adhered. The properties of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives of greatest interest in the surgical field are excellent hemostasis, rapid tissue adhesion, and possible bacteriostatic qualities.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 18, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 3, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 18, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 30, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

tissue adhesivewound dressingcyanoacrylategingival graftpalatal graftconective tissue graft

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain perception

    The pain perceived by the patient will be evaluated by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (calibrated from 0 to 10, with 10 being the worst pain imaginable) during the first 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 14 days.

    Days 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 14 after the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Donor site healing

    will be evaluated at 7 and 14 days after the procedure

Other Outcomes (1)

  • intake of painkillers

    7 days after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Cyanoacrylate Group

EXPERIMENTAL

In the test group, a cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV; Glustitch, Delta, Canada) will be applied.

Drug: Cyanoacrylate

Suture Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the control group, the edges will be approximated with 4/0 monofilament non-absorbable nylon suture (Aragó, Barcelona, Spain).

Procedure: Suture

Interventions

In the test group, a cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesive (PeriAcryl 90 HV; Glustitch, Delta, Canada) will be applied.

Cyanoacrylate Group
SuturePROCEDURE

After harvesting the full-thickness connective tissue graft, the edges of the control group will be approximated with 4/0 non-absorbable monofilament nylon suture (Aragó, Barcelona, Spain).

Suture Group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient must be considered a candidate for mucogingival treatment
  • Requiring grafting around teeth or implants.
  • No age limit is established for the sample.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with systemic or scarring compromises
  • Treated with bisphosphonates
  • Smokers of more than 10 cigarettes a day
  • With a history of previous palatal grafting in that location
  • Present any type of contraindication to undergo surgery cannot take part in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Joaquín López-Malla Matute

A Coruña, La Coruña, 15011, Spain

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Alhourani MA, Kasem T, Hamadah O. Comparative study between using a tissue adhesive (N-BCA & OCA) and surgical sutures in free gingival graft surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Dent Med Probl. 2022 Apr-Jun;59(2):241-248. doi: 10.17219/dmp/135382.

    PMID: 35775864BACKGROUND
  • Basma HS, Saleh MHA, Abou-Arraj RV, Imbrogno M, Ravida A, Wang HL, Li P, Geurs N. Patient-reported outcomes of palatal donor site healing using four different wound dressing modalities following free epithelialized mucosal grafts: A four-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2023 Jan;94(1):88-97. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0172. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

    PMID: 35754198BACKGROUND
  • Castro-Gaspar C, Olmedo-Gaya MV, Romero-Olid MN, Lisbona-Gonzalez MJ, Vallecillo-Rivas M, Reyes-Botella C. Comparison between Tissue Adhesive Cyanoacrylate and Suture for Palatal Fibromucosa Healing: A Randomized Controlled Study. Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;14(22):7009. doi: 10.3390/ma14227009.

    PMID: 34832409BACKGROUND
  • Stavropoulou C, Atout RN, Brownlee M, Schroth RJ, Kelekis-Cholakis A. A randomized clinical trial of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives in donor site of connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2019 Jun;90(6):608-615. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0475. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

    PMID: 30517975BACKGROUND
  • Tavelli L, Asa'ad F, Acunzo R, Pagni G, Consonni D, Rasperini G. Minimizing Patient Morbidity Following Palatal Gingival Harvesting: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Nov/Dec;38(6):e127-e134. doi: 10.11607/prd.3581.

    PMID: 30304077BACKGROUND
  • Tavelli L, Ravida A, Saleh MHA, Maska B, Del Amo FS, Rasperini G, Wang HL. Pain perception following epithelialized gingival graft harvesting: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):459-468. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2455-5. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

    PMID: 29713890BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

CyanoacrylatesSutures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcrylatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsNitrilesPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsTissue AdhesivesManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and AgricultureSurgical Fixation DevicesSurgical EquipmentEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Joaquín LM Matute, dentistry

    Alfonso X El Sabio University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Joaquín LM Matute, dentistry

CONTACT

Marc C Raga, student

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Master on Oral Surgery, Implantology and Periodontic´s professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2023

First Posted

November 3, 2023

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

March 1, 2024

Study Completion

May 1, 2024

Last Updated

November 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations