Comparing Operative, Postoperative and Quality of Life of Patients After Salvage and Radical Cystectomy
Salvage Cystectomy vs Radical Cystectomy, a Comparative Study
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare operative difficulties, type of urinary diversion, intraoperative \& postoperative complications and quality of life in patients underwent radical cystectomy and those after salvage cystectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedNovember 3, 2023
August 1, 2023
9.8 years
November 27, 2022
October 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
intraoperative and postoperative complications of salvage and radical cystectomy.
intraoperative blood loss, quality of dissection, intestinal injury.
up to 1 year (retrospective and prospective case series)
urinary diversion
type of urinary diversion whether continent or incontinent and which type of shunt.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
quality of life of patients postoperatively
up to 3 years
postoperative erectile function of patients
up to 2 years
Study Arms (2)
salvage cystectomy
patients will undergo salvage cystectomy after failure of bladder preservation protocol
radical cystectomy
patients who will undergo radical cystectomy without going through bladder preservation
Interventions
cystectomy either radical or salvage involves removal of urinary bladder together with prostate, seminal vesicles and urethra with lymph node dissection.
Eligibility Criteria
patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer
You may qualify if:
- patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer ≥ cT2N0/xM0 who underwent salvage cystectomy / going for bladder preservation protocol.
- patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer underwent radical cystectomy.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients refusing to participate in our study.
- patients with metastatic bladder cancer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut university hospital
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71511, Egypt
Related Publications (6)
Moonen LM, Horenblas S, van der Voet JC, Nuyten MJ, Bartelink H. Bladder conservation in selected T1G3 and muscle-invasive T2-T3a bladder carcinoma using combination therapy of surgery and iridium-192 implantation. Br J Urol. 1994 Sep;74(3):322-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb16620.x.
PMID: 7953264RESULTMilowsky MI, Rumble RB, Booth CM, Gilligan T, Eapen LJ, Hauke RJ, Boumansour P, Lee CT. Guideline on Muscle-Invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer (European Association of Urology Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1945-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9797. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
PMID: 27001593RESULTPloussard G, Daneshmand S, Efstathiou JA, Herr HW, James ND, Rodel CM, Shariat SF, Shipley WU, Sternberg CN, Thalmann GN, Kassouf W. Critical analysis of bladder sparing with trimodal therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):120-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PMID: 24613684RESULTRodel C, Grabenbauer GG, Kuhn R, Papadopoulos T, Dunst J, Meyer M, Schrott KM, Sauer R. Combined-modality treatment and selective organ preservation in invasive bladder cancer: long-term results. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 15;20(14):3061-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.027.
PMID: 12118019RESULTPieretti A, Krasnow R, Drumm M, Gusev A, Dahl DM, McGovern F, Blute ML, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Feldman AS, Wszolek MF. Complications and Outcomes of Salvage Cystectomy after Trimodality Therapy. J Urol. 2021 Jul;206(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001696. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
PMID: 33617327RESULTHerskind C, Bentzen SM, Overgaard J, Overgaard M, Bamberg M, Rodemann HP. Differentiation state of skin fibroblast cultures versus risk of subcutaneous fibrosis after radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1998 Jun;47(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00018-8.
PMID: 9681889RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 6 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal ivestigator, urology resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2022
First Posted
November 3, 2023
Study Start
January 30, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
November 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share