Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer vs Minimally Invasive Repair in Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture
Outcomes Evaluation of Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer Versus Minimally Invasive Primary Repair in Patients With Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare the outcomes of two different surgical techniques (Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus transfer - Group 1 vs Minimally Invasive primary repair - Group 2) for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture. The main questions to be answered are:
- 1.Which group's patients are more satisfied?
- 2.Which group's patients appear to have a greater complication rate?
- 3.Which group's patients have greater calf and ankle circumference compared to the unaffected limb?
- 4.Which group's patients have greater passive and active range of ankle motion compared to the unaffected limb?
- 5.Are group 1 patients characterized by strength deficit in hallux flexion power?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2026
CompletedOctober 15, 2024
October 1, 2024
2.1 years
October 28, 2023
October 12, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction assessed with the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score
Evaluated and quantified with the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (minimum value = 0 - worst outcome, maximal value = 100 - best outcome)
More than 12 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Complication Rate
More than 12 months postoperatively
Calf Circumference
More than 12 months postoperatively
Ankle Circumference
More than 12 months postoperatively
Ankle joint Range of Motion
More than 12 months postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus transfer / Group 1
Patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture managed with Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus transfer by one surgeon (A.E.) in one hospital (General Hospital of Naoussa, Naoussa, Greece), all of which followed the same rehabilitation protocol.
Minimally Invasive Primary repair / Group 2
Patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture managed with Minimally Invasive Primary repair by one surgeon (P.S.) in one hospital (St. Luke's Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece), all of which followed the same rehabilitation protocol.
Interventions
Two different surgical techniques were applied in two different patient groups for the same disease. Their outcomes are evaluated and compared
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with Achilles tendon rupture operated exclusively with these two surgical techniques, by these two particular surgeons (A.E. and P.S.) in their respective hospitals (General Hospital of Naoussa, St Luke's Hospital).
You may qualify if:
- Signed Consent Form
- Age between 18-75 years
- Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture (\<3 weeks)
- Surgical Management with Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus transfer or Minimally Invasive primary tendon repair
- More than 12 months postoperative follow-up
- Patients operated after 2015
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or Unwillingness to cooperate
- Medically unfit for examination (e.g. due to terminal illness)
- Age less than 18 or more than 75 years
- Non-operative Management as definitive treatment
- Neglected Achilles Tendon Rupture (\>3 weeks)
- Bilateral Achilles Tendon Rupture
- Patients operated before 2015
- Comorbidities interfering with the secondary outcomes (e.g. Venous insufficiency resulting in lower limb excessive edema interferes with ankle and calf circumference, rheumatoid arthritis and/or previous foot and ankle surgery interferes with active and passive range of motion of the ankle, etc)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aristotle University Of Thessalonikilead
- General Hospital of Naoussacollaborator
- Private Orthopedics Practice P. Symeonidiscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
General Hospital of Naoussa
NĂ¡ousa, Central Macedonia, 59200, Greece
Related Publications (4)
Abdelatif NMN, Batista JP. Outcomes of Percutaneous Achilles Repair Compared With Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfer to Treat Achilles Tendon Ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Sep;43(9):1174-1184. doi: 10.1177/10711007221096674. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
PMID: 35686445RESULTAbdelatif NMN, Batista JP. Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer for the Management of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures in Professional Soccer Players. Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Feb;43(2):164-175. doi: 10.1177/10711007211036439. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
PMID: 34558318RESULTBatista JP, Abdelatif NMN, Del Vecchio JJ, Diniz P, Pereira H. Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer for the Management of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Prospective Case Series Report With a Minimum of 18 Months' Follow-Up. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Sep-Oct;59(5):927-937. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
PMID: 32527698RESULTMartin KD, Crouser NJ, Khan IA. Minimally Invasive Mid-Substance Achilles Tendon Repair Using the Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS). JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022 Sep 22;12(3):e21.00050. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00050. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
PMID: 36816527RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michail K. Kotsapas, MD, MSc
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Michail Kotsapas, MD, MSc, Resident of Orthopedics (General Hospital of Naoussa), PhD Candidate (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2023
First Posted
November 2, 2023
Study Start
March 5, 2023
Primary Completion
March 30, 2025
Study Completion
March 30, 2026
Last Updated
October 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10