Neuromuscular Blockade Comparison for GI-2 Recovery After Bowel Resection
Sugammadex VS Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate Reversal of Neuromuscular Relaxation For Time to Return of Bowel Function After Bowel Resection: Prospective, Randomized, Triple-blinded Clinical Trial For Quality Improvement
2 other identifiers
interventional
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to see the outcome of Sugammadex versus Neostigmine with Glycopyrrolate in colorectal surgery as it relates to its effects on post-surgical time (in hours) to first bowel movement and tolerance for solid food (GI-2 recovery) following bowel resection surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2024
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 17, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 4, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 25, 2026
CompletedAugust 25, 2026
July 1, 2026
1.9 years
October 20, 2023
July 8, 2026
July 31, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
GI-2 Recovery
GI-2 recovery as defined as hour to first bowel movement and toleration of oral diet
Post-surgically until report of first bowel movement
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Cost of Stay
From hospital admission to discharge
Length of Stay
From hospital admission to discharge
Morbidity & Mortality
Up to 30 days post surgery
Post Reversal Bradycardia
Post surgically but prior to PACU discharge, up to 24 hours
Duration of PACU Stay
From surgical end time to PACU discharge, up to 24 hours
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Neostigmine plus Glycopyrrolate
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.07 mg/kg Neostigmine plus 0.014 mg/kg glycopyrrolate 2 syringes numbered 1 and 2 1. Syringe #1: Glycopyrrolate 2. Syringe #2: Neostigmine
Sugammadex
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2.0 mg/kg of Sugammadex plus saline equivalent 2 syringes numbered 1 and 2 1. Syringe #1: 0.9% sodium chloride 2. Syringe #2: : full Sugammadex dose + 0.9 sodium chloride (QS to match volume)
Interventions
Examine GI-2 recovery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or older
- Laparoscopic bowel resection surgery under general anesthesia with nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium or vecuronium, and requiring inpatient admission
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to Rocuronium, Vecuronium, or Sugammadex
- Bowel resection surgery requiring an ostomy
- No severe valvulopathy, no systolic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), no coronary artery disease with positive stress test for ischemic regional wall motion abnormality
- No autoimmune pulmonary disease, no severe pulmonary fibrosis, no severe pulmonary hypertension, no COPD with requirement of home oxygen, no pulmonary cancer of primary or metastatic origin
- Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) of less than 30
- Pregnancy
- Incapable of providing consent or understanding the research project
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Irvinelead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UC Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Related Publications (8)
Hristovska AM, Duch P, Allingstrup M, Afshari A. Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 14;8(8):CD012763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012763.
PMID: 28806470BACKGROUNDBriggs A, Goldberg J. Tips, Tricks, and Technique for Laparoscopic Colectomy. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Apr;30(2):130-135. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597313.
PMID: 28381944BACKGROUNDDeyhim N, Beck A, Balk J, Liebl MG. Impact of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate on Perioperative Efficiency. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jan 31;12:69-79. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S221308. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32099426BACKGROUNDGray PJ, Goldwag JL, Eid MA, Sacks OA, Wilson LR, Wilson MZ, Ivatury SJ. Does Bowel Function Change After Colectomy for Colon Malignancy? J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:283-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
PMID: 33039637BACKGROUNDBhurwal A, Minacapelli CD, Patel A, Mutneja H, Goel A, Shah I, Bansal V, Brahmbhatt B, Das KM. Evaluation of a U.S. National Cohort to Determine Utilization in Colectomy Rates for Ulcerative Colitis Among Ethnicities. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022 Jan 5;28(1):54-61. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izab020.
PMID: 33534892BACKGROUNDLudwig K, Enker WE, Delaney CP, Wolff BG, Du W, Fort JG, Cherubini M, Cucinotta J, Techner L. Gastrointestinal tract recovery in patients undergoing bowel resection: results of a randomized trial of alvimopan and placebo with a standardized accelerated postoperative care pathway. Arch Surg. 2008 Nov;143(11):1098-105. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1098.
PMID: 19015469BACKGROUNDDeljou A, Soleimani J, Sprung J, Schroeder DR, Weingarten TN. Effects of Reversal Technique for Neuromuscular Paralysis on Time to Recovery of Bowel Function after Craniotomy. Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1605-1609. doi: 10.1177/00031348211058631. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
PMID: 34986061BACKGROUNDBooij LH, van Egmond J, Driessen JJ, de Boer HD. In vivo animal studies with sugammadex. Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64 Suppl 1:38-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05869.x.
PMID: 19222430BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This was a single-center study, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Administration of open-label rescue reversal medication, when clinically indicated, may have influenced the interpretation of postoperative outcomes. The study should be interpreted in the context of these design considerations.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert Ryan Field, MD
- Organization
- University of California, Irvine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert R Field, MD
Associate Clinical Professor
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Triple
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Clinical Professor, Dept of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2023
First Posted
November 1, 2023
Study Start
April 17, 2024
Primary Completion
March 4, 2026
Study Completion
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
August 25, 2026
Results First Posted
August 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share