Primary Precutting Versus Conventional Over-the-Wire Sphinchterotomy For Managment Of Large Common Bile Duct Stones
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During the last decades, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become the standard of care for the treatment of many pancreaticobiliary diseases \[Canena et al., 2014\]. However, ERCP is a challenging technique with a slow learning curve and is associated with complications, some of them lifethreatening \[Chandrasekhara et al., 2017\]. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication after ERCP \[Testoni et al., 2016\]. A systematic survey of prospective studies including 16,885 patients reported an incidence of PEP of approximately 3.5%. Severe pancreatitis was found in 11% of the cases, and death occurred in 3% of PEP cases \[Andriulli et al., 2007\]. Therefore, many attempts to reduce the rate of this complication have been pursued. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is still considered to be a prerequisite for biliary sphincterotomy. Despite the use of various endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) catheters and wire-guided sphincterotomes, CBD cannulation has been reported to fail in 5 % - 20 % of cases \[Larkin and Huibregtse, 2001\]. Precut sphincterotomy can allow access to the bile duct in such cases and is widely performed by expert endoscopists when there is a clear indication for endoscopic intervention. However, the use of precut sphincterotomy remains controversial because reported complication rates of the widely practiced needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS) technique vary between 5 % and 20 % \[Shakoor and Geenen, 1992\]. Precut sphincterotomy, which includes needle-knife papillotomy (NKP), septotomy, and needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF), is often performed to facilitate access to the common bile duct of patients with difficult biliary access (DBA). Furthermore, NKF has been recommended as the preferred technique for precutting by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy \[Testoni et al., 2016\] and the latest International Consensus\[Liao et al., 2017\]. The success of NKS also depends on the expertise of the endoscopist, and the consensus opinion is that this technique should only be performed by experienced endoscopists \[Baillie,1997 \]. In contrast to NKS, incision of the papilla of Vater using an Erlangen-type precut sphincterotome has been previously reported by Binmoeller et al group to be an effective and safe auxiliary method for achieving access to the CBD after failed cannulation attempts \[Binmoeller et al., 1996\]. The definition of DBA varied widely \[Mariani et al., 2016\]. The latest guidelines for the definition of DBA differed widely from the latest guideline of The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (defining DBA as the presence of ≥1 of the following: \>5 contacts with the papilla while attempting to cannulate; \>5 minutes spent attempting to cannulate following visualization of the papilla; \>1 2 unintended pancreatic duct cannulation or opacification) \[Testoni et al., 2016\]. and the International Consensus Panel (defining DBA as the inability to achieve selective biliary cannulation by the standard ERCP technique within 10 minutes or up to 5 attempts or failure of access to the major papilla) \[Liao et al., 2017 \].
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2024
CompletedOctober 30, 2023
October 1, 2023
1 year
October 4, 2023
October 27, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Precutting Versus Conventional Over-the-Wire Sphinchterotomy For Managment Of Large Common Bile Duct Stones
we will assess differences between conventional sphincterotomy and primary precutting as regard which methode will be easier in cannulation, which methode wil produce more complications as acute pancreatitis, bleeding or git perforation during managment of large common bile duct stones
12 months
Study Arms (2)
group A
ACTIVE COMPARATORsphencterotomy of papilla by conventuional methodes
group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORprecutting of the papilla by knife needle
Interventions
cutting the papilla and cannulation with sweeping of common bile duct by ballon and stent insertion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with difficult biliary access (DBA) consenting to randomization in an interventional design randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare precut sphincterotomy (EPS) with persistent cannulation attempts (PCA).
- Patients who required biliary cannulation but without previous sphincterotomy.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with coagulopathy or acute pancreatitis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Sohag university Hospital
Sohag, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Canena J, Liberato M, Coutinho AP, Marques I, Romao C, Veiga PM, Neves BC. Predictive value of cholangioscopy after endoscopic management of early postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures with an increasing number of plastic stents: a prospective study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Feb;79(2):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
PMID: 24012251BACKGROUNDASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Eloubeidi MA, Fanelli RD, Faulx AL, Gurudu SR, Kothari S, Lightdale JR, Qumseya BJ, Shaukat A, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Aug 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 27546389BACKGROUNDTestoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, Arvanitakis M, Bories E, Costamagna G, Deviere J, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Dumonceau JM, Giovannini M, Gyokeres T, Hafner M, Halttunen J, Hassan C, Lopes L, Papanikolaou IS, Tham TC, Tringali A, van Hooft J, Williams EJ. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016 Jul;48(7):657-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
PMID: 27299638BACKGROUNDAndriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.
PMID: 17509029BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Asmaa N Mohamed, professor
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecteurer tropical medicine department sohag univerisity hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2023
First Posted
October 30, 2023
Study Start
September 15, 2023
Primary Completion
September 15, 2024
Study Completion
September 15, 2024
Last Updated
October 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10