Study Stopped
Delays in specimen recruitment have increased costs and strained resources, risking study validity. To maintain ethical and scientific integrity, the study will be terminated early.
Evaluation of cCeLL-Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy for Real-time Brain Tumor Diagnosis
cCeLLExvivo
A Prospective, Multi-centered, Assessor-blinded Clinical Performance Study to Evaluate the Sensitivity and Specificity of the cCeLL-Ex Vivo Device for Intraoperative Brain Tumor Diagnosis.
2 other identifiers
interventional
285
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
Intra-operative evaluation of residual brain tumor currently relies on frozen-section histopathology, which typically requires 20-30 minutes for tissue processing and interpretation, prolonging operative time and increasing staffing demands. Confocal Laser Fluorescence Microscopy (cCeLL - Ex vivo) acquires real-time, high-resolution fluorescence images of resected tissue and therefore may serve as a rapid alternative or adjunct to frozen sections. This prospective, multi-center study was designed to systematically assess the clinical performance of cCeLL - Ex vivo during brain-tumor surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 27, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 15, 2025
CompletedDecember 15, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.9 years
October 5, 2023
April 8, 2025
November 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Sensitivity for Tumor Detection (Specimen-level)
The diagnostic results of cCeLL - Ex vivo imaging interpretation by experts and frozen section examination for 283 tumor specimens are presented below.
From neurosurgical resection to permanent pathology (≈ 4 weeks)
Clinical Specificity for Tumor Detection (Specimen-level)
The diagnostic results of cCeLL - Ex vivo imaging interpretation by experts and frozen section examination for 39 normal specimens are as follows
From neurosurgical resection to permanent pathology (≈ 4 weeks)
Study Arms (1)
Patients already scheduled for brain tumor surgery
EXPERIMENTALStudy Arms and Intervention This study compares cCeLL - Ex vivo imaging (test) and frozen section histopathology (control) against permanent section histopathology (reference standard). * Test Arm: Uses confocal laser fluorescence microscopy (CLFM) for real-time imaging of resected tumor tissues, analyzed by blinded pathologists. * Control Arm: Standard H\&E-stained frozen section, requiring tissue processing (30-40 min) for intraoperative diagnosis. The study evaluates diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of cCeLL - Ex vivo imaging.
Interventions
Neoplastic brain tissue biopsied from participant will be visualized, and images will be captured using cCeLL - Ex vivo.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Specimens and images used in this study must meet all of the following criteria:
- Tissue obtained from male or female patients aged 19 years or older.
- Tissue collected from patients scheduled for neurosurgical resection of a suspected brain tumor.
- Tissue obtained from patients capable of understanding and signing the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Specimens and images that meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
- Emergency cases where informed consent could not be obtained before surgery.
- Specimens with significant hemorrhage, affecting image quality.
- Small biopsy specimens that do not meet the required size for imaging.
- Poor-quality images that do not meet study criteria, including:
- Low-quality cCeLL - Ex vivo images.
- Non-diagnostic cCeLL - Ex vivo images of the tumor core.
- Cases deemed inappropriate for the study by the principal investigator or study staff due to ethical concerns or potential impact on study results.
- Patients undergoing multiple surgeries at the same site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- VPIX Medicallead
- Unity Health Torontocollaborator
- Korea University Anam Hospitalcollaborator
- Samsung Medical Centercollaborator
- Seoul National University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (14)
Amos WB, White JG. How the confocal laser scanning microscope entered biological research. Biol Cell. 2003 Sep;95(6):335-42. doi: 10.1016/s0248-4900(03)00078-9.
PMID: 14519550BACKGROUNDBIS Research Inc. Medical market data. Updated 2022. https://blog.bisresearch.com/bis-research-market-insights-quick-bytes
BACKGROUNDCarl Zeiss Meditec AG. Convivo: Putting in vivo cellular imaging at your fingertips. 2019:Brochure. Available at: https://www.zeiss.com/content/dam/Meditec/ref_master/products/convivo/documents/convivo_brochure.pdf
BACKGROUNDChand P, Amit S, Gupta R, Agarwal A. Errors, limitations, and pitfalls in the diagnosis of central and peripheral nervous system lesions in intraoperative cytology and frozen sections. J Cytol. 2016 Apr-Jun;33(2):93-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.182530.
PMID: 27279685BACKGROUNDde Martel C, Georges D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Clifford GM. Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: a worldwide incidence analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e180-e190. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30488-7. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
PMID: 31862245BACKGROUNDFerlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020 (https://gco.iarc.fr/today, accessed February 2021).
BACKGROUNDIndustryARC. Oncology Market - Forecast (2020 - 2025). 2020.
BACKGROUNDMat Zin AA, Zulkarnain S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cytology Smear and Frozen Section in Glioma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):321-325. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.321.
PMID: 30803189BACKGROUNDMauna Kea Technologies. Cellvizio: Real-time in vivo cellular imaging platform. 2021:Brochure. Available at: http://www.cellvizio.net/uploads/media/media_pdf/0001/03/MKT-132-EN-Cellvizio%20Web%20Brochure.pdf
BACKGROUNDMAVIG GmbH. Vivascope: Confocal laser scanning microscopy - In vivo histology for cellular level skin analyses in cosmetic research and dermopharmacy. 2019:Brochure. Available at: https://www.vivascope.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Cosmeticbrochure.pdf
BACKGROUNDSamal S, Kalra R, Sharma J, et al. Comparison between crush/squash cytology and frozen section preparation in intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Oncol J India. 2018;1:25-30.
BACKGROUNDTofte K, Berger C, Torp SH, Solheim O. The diagnostic properties of frozen sections in suspected intracranial tumors: A study of 578 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Dec 3;5:170. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.146153. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25593754BACKGROUNDWhite JG, Amos WB, Fordham M. An evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):41-8. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.1.41.
PMID: 3112165BACKGROUNDWHO. Assessing national capacity for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases: report of the 2019 global survey. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. Ex vivo design restricts immediate in vivo application. 2. Single-arm structure limits certain statistical inferences. 3. Learning curve affects imaging time. 4. Results may not fully generalize beyond the study settings. 5. Some data were missing, though at a low rate.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Min-Jae Jeong
- Organization
- VPIX Medical, Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sunit Das, MD,MMSc,PhD
Unity Health- St. Michael's Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Shin-Hyuk Kang, MD,MMSc,PhD
Korea University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This trial employed an assessor-blinded design. Specifically, the pathologist who interpreted the cCeLL - Ex vivo images had no access to the patient's clinical information, frozen section results, or permanent section results. By ensuring that the individual responsible for cCeLL - Ex vivo image interpretation was blinded to other diagnostic data, the study minimized bias in determining sensitivity and specificity outcomes.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2023
First Posted
October 24, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 27, 2024
Study Completion
November 27, 2024
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Results First Posted
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share