The Efficacy and Safety of EOB-MRI Guided Microwave Ablation for Early HCC: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study
1 other identifier
observational
334
1 country
1
Brief Summary
HCC is one of most common causes of cancer-related death in the world due to lately diagnosis by typical hallmarks which rely on completed arterialization. So it is important to earlier diagnose and treat hypovascular early HCC(eHCC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for early HCC, also to explore the feasibility of EOB-MRI (Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI) guided ablation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2023
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2030
ExpectedOctober 24, 2023
October 1, 2023
2.1 years
October 17, 2023
October 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
5-years overall survival (OS) after MWA for early HCC
Analyze the efficacy and safety of EOB-MRI-guided microwave ablation in the treatment of eHCC;
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Rate of completed ablation after MWA
rate of completed ablation at one month
Study Arms (1)
single-group with MWA
334 patients with confirmed or suspected eHCC as indicated by EOB-MRI were to be included in this study in a population with high or extremely high-risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver disease. Then Microwave ablation (MWA) was performed under EOB-MRI guidance in patients with confirmed or suspected eHCC.
Interventions
Microwave ablation (MWA) was performed under EOB-MRI guidance in patients with confirmed or suspected eHCC.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with chronic liver disease at high-risk or extremely high-risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and EOB-MRI shows a confirmed or suspected eHCC.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Patients with chronic liver disease who are at high/extremely high-risk of hepatocellular carcinoma;
- EOB-MRI suggestive of confirmed or suspected eHCC (single lesion ≤ 2 cm or number of lesions ≤ 3 and maximum diameter ≤ 2 cm)
- No previous history of hepatocellular carcinoma;
- Not receiving any anti-cancer treatment;
- Liver function Child-push A or B.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of lymph nodes or distant metastases;
- Presence of liver metastases;
- Prior malignancy;
- Severe cardiopulmonary or renal dysfunction;
- Suffering from uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction (prothrombin time \> 25 seconds, prothrombin activity \< 40%, platelet count ≤ 50x10\^9/L);
- Severe infectious lesions in the area of the puncture needle tract.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shandong PH
Jinan, China
Related Publications (12)
Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, Lencioni R, Koike K, Zucman-Rossi J, Finn RS. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jan 21;7(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3.
PMID: 33479224RESULTInternational Consensus Group for Hepatocellular NeoplasiaThe International Consensus Group for Hepatocellular Neoplasia. Pathologic diagnosis of early hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of the international consensus group for hepatocellular neoplasia. Hepatology. 2009 Feb;49(2):658-64. doi: 10.1002/hep.22709. No abstract available.
PMID: 19177576RESULTSirlin CB, Kielar AZ, Tang A, Bashir MR. LI-RADS: a glimpse into the future. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jan;43(1):231-236. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1448-1.
PMID: 29318354RESULTOmata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, Tateishi R, Han KH, Chawla YK, Shiina S, Jafri W, Payawal DA, Ohki T, Ogasawara S, Chen PJ, Lesmana CRA, Lesmana LA, Gani RA, Obi S, Dokmeci AK, Sarin SK. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017 Jul;11(4):317-370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
PMID: 28620797RESULTChoi JY, Lee JM, Sirlin CB. CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects. Radiology. 2014 Sep;272(3):635-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132361.
PMID: 25153274RESULTRenzulli M, Biselli M, Brocchi S, Granito A, Vasuri F, Tovoli F, Sessagesimi E, Piscaglia F, D'Errico A, Bolondi L, Golfieri R. New hallmark of hepatocellular carcinoma, early hepatocellular carcinoma and high-grade dysplastic nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI in patients with cirrhosis: a new diagnostic algorithm. Gut. 2018 Sep;67(9):1674-1682. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315384. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
PMID: 29437912RESULTReig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fabrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado A, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Fuster J, Ayuso C, Bruix J. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
PMID: 34801630RESULTKudo M, Kawamura Y, Hasegawa K, Tateishi R, Kariyama K, Shiina S, Toyoda H, Imai Y, Hiraoka A, Ikeda M, Izumi N, Moriguchi M, Ogasawara S, Minami Y, Ueshima K, Murakami T, Miyayama S, Nakashima O, Yano H, Sakamoto M, Hatano E, Shimada M, Kokudo N, Mochida S, Takehara T. Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: JSH Consensus Statements and Recommendations 2021 Update. Liver Cancer. 2021 Jun;10(3):181-223. doi: 10.1159/000514174. Epub 2021 May 19.
PMID: 34239808RESULTFacciorusso A, Abd El Aziz MA, Tartaglia N, Ramai D, Mohan BP, Cotsoglou C, Pusceddu S, Giacomelli L, Ambrosi A, Sacco R. Microwave Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;12(12):3796. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123796.
PMID: 33339274RESULTChen L, Ren Y, Sun T, Cao Y, Yan L, Zhang W, Ouyang T, Zheng C. The efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation in the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma: A population-based study. Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(11):3715-3725. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3923. Epub 2021 May 7.
PMID: 33960697RESULTSuwa K, Seki T, Aoi K, Yamashina M, Murata M, Yamashiki N, Nishio A, Shimatani M, Naganuma M. Efficacy of microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Aug;46(8):3790-3797. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03008-9. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
PMID: 33675382RESULTWang F, Numata K, Nihonmatsu H, Chuma M, Moriya S, Nozaki A, Ogushi K, Fukuda H, Ruan L, Okada M, Luo W, Koizumi N, Nakano M, Otani M, Inayama Y, Maeda S. Intraprocedurally EOB-MRI/US fusion imaging focusing on hepatobiliary phase findings can help to reduce the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):1149-1158. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1825837.
PMID: 32996799RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of imaging magnetic resonance interventional diagnosis and Treatment Department, Shandong Provincial Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2023
First Posted
October 24, 2023
Study Start
August 30, 2023
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2030
Last Updated
October 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share