NCT06096181

Brief Summary

Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis may need surgery to correct their scoliosis. General anesthesia is required for this surgery, and a multimodal analgesic regimen using combinations of opioid and non-opioid medications is the standard of care. The purpose of this study is to compare two combinations of total intravenous anesthetic medications in children with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis having posterior spinal fusion surgery. Participants in the study will be randomly selected to receive either Propofol and Remifentanil or Propofol and Dexmedetomidine as their total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). TIVA is favored over gas anesthesia because gas anesthesia can affect the neurological monitoring necessary for this surgery. The first combination (Propofol + Remifentanil) is the most common one used for this surgery at our institution, and the second combination (Propofol + Dexmedetomidine) is more commonly used in adult spine surgery. Though Dexmedetomidine is not approved for pediatric use by the FDA, it is widely used in pediatric patients for procedural sedation and surgical anesthesia in the US and worldwide. Both anesthetic combinations are used safely in adult and pediatric patients at our institution. Although remifentanil works fast and is an excellent pain medication during surgery, there are reports that it's use can cause increased pain sensitivity and greater need for narcotic pain medication after surgery. This phenomenon is known as opioid-induced hyperalgesia. The investigators hypothesize that avoiding the use of remifentanil in the TIVA by using dexmedetomidine could avoid OIH and thus result in superior postop pain control. Our study's primary goal is to measure the total opioid consumption on postoperative days (POD)# 0 and 1. Our secondary goals are to measure the pain scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) on POD# 0 and 1, measure the time it takes for participants to move their feet to command when surgery is done, and measure the time it takes for participants to be extubated when surgery is done. By comparing these measurements, the investigators hope to find out if there is any significant difference between the two TIVAs in terms of postop opioid requirements, pain scores, and time to wake up from anesthesia. The investigators hope that our study gives us more knowledge on how to better treat postoperative pain in children who have spine surgery to correct their

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2023

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 16, 2023

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 20, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 24, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 24, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 10, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 10, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 16, 2023

Results QC Date

October 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

October 22, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Total Opioid Consumption (IV and PO in MME) on POD# 0 and 1

    Measure the median total opioid medications needed by the participants (IV and oral) after surgery on post operative days # 0 and 1.

    Post Op Day# 0 and 1

  • Total Opioid Consumption (IV and PO in MME) on POD# 0 and 1

    Measure the mean total opioid medications needed by the participants (IV and oral) after surgery on post operative days # 0 and 1.

    Post Op Day# 0 and 1

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Mean VAS Pain Score on POD# 0 and 1

    Post Op Day# 0 and 1

  • Time From Skin Closure to Participant Being Able to Move Their Feet on Command (Mins)

    Intraoperative (day of surgery)

  • Time From Skin Closure to Extubation

    Intraoperative (day of surgery)

Study Arms (2)

Propofol + Remifentanil

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants are randomly selected to receive Propofol + Remifentanil TIVA as their anesthesia. Dose of IV Propofol is 100-200 mcg/kg/min and dose of Remifentanil is 0.2-0.5 mcg/kg/min. TIVA is titrated to keep bispectral index (BIS) \< 55-60 to ensure patient is asleep.

Drug: Remifentanil TIVADrug: Propofol TIVA

Propofol + Dexmedetomidine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants are randomly selected to receive Propofol + Dexmedetomidine as their anesthesia. Dose of Propofol is 100-200 mcg/kg/min and dose Dexmedetomidine is ) 0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/hr. TIVA is titrated to beep bispectral index (BIS) \< 55-60 to ensure patient is asleep.

Drug: Dexmedetomidine TIVADrug: Propofol TIVA

Interventions

Remifentanil is more commonly used in the TIVA combination for pediatric patients having this surgery.

Also known as: Ultiva TIVA
Propofol + Remifentanil

Dexmedetomidine is less commonly used in the TIVA combination for pediatric patients having this surgery.

Also known as: Precedex TIVA
Propofol + Dexmedetomidine

Propofol is an anesthetic drug that causes sleep during surgery.

Also known as: Diprivan TIVA
Propofol + DexmedetomidinePropofol + Remifentanil

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 12-18 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification (ASA Class) 1 and 2
  • Have diagnosis of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
  • Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion with instrumentation for scoliosis correction
  • Matched on age, sex, and the number of vertebral levels fused

You may not qualify if:

  • Neuromuscular scoliosis
  • Allergy to any of the multi-modal analgesia regimen drugs
  • Use of serotonergic drugs, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), mixed agonist/antagonist opioid analgesics

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States

Location

Related Publications (39)

  • Young CD, McLuckie D, Spencer AO. Anaesthetic care for surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BJA Educ. 2019 Jul;19(7):232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 May 14. No abstract available.

    PMID: 33456896BACKGROUND
  • Lee CS, Merchant S, Chidambaran V. Postoperative Pain Management in Pediatric Spinal Fusion Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis. Paediatr Drugs. 2020 Dec;22(6):575-601. doi: 10.1007/s40272-020-00423-1. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

    PMID: 33094437BACKGROUND
  • Gall O, Aubineau JV, Berniere J, Desjeux L, Murat I. Analgesic effect of low-dose intrathecal morphine after spinal fusion in children. Anesthesiology. 2001 Mar;94(3):447-52. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200103000-00014.

    PMID: 11374604BACKGROUND
  • Goodarzi M. The advantages of intrathecal opioids for spinal fusion in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 1998;8(2):131-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1998.00737.x.

    PMID: 9549739BACKGROUND
  • Eschertzhuber S, Hohlrieder M, Keller C, Oswald E, Kuehbacher G, Innerhofer P. Comparison of high- and low-dose intrathecal morphine for spinal fusion in children. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;100(4):538-43. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen025. Epub 2008 Feb 27.

    PMID: 18305080BACKGROUND
  • Tripi PA, Poe-Kochert C, Potzman J, Son-Hing JP, Thompson GH. Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 15;33(20):2248-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd8be.

    PMID: 18794769BACKGROUND
  • Ibach BW, Loeber C, Shukry M, Hagemann TM, Harrison D, Johnson PN. Duration of intrathecal morphine effect in children with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. J Opioid Manag. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):295-303. doi: 10.5055/jom.2015.0278.

    PMID: 26312956BACKGROUND
  • Ross AK, Davis PJ, Dear Gd GL, Ginsberg B, McGowan FX, Stiller RD, Henson LG, Huffman C, Muir KT. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil in anesthetized pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery or diagnostic procedures. Anesth Analg. 2001 Dec;93(6):1393-401, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200112000-00008.

    PMID: 11726413BACKGROUND
  • Donmez A, Kizilkan A, Berksun H, Varan B, Tokel K. One center's experience with remifentanil infusions for pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001 Dec;15(6):736-9. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2001.28319.

    PMID: 11748523BACKGROUND
  • German JW, Aneja R, Heard C, Dias M. Continuous remifentanil for pediatric neurosurgery patients. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000 Nov;33(5):227-229. doi: 10.1159/000055959.

    PMID: 11155057BACKGROUND
  • Sammartino M, Garra R, Sbaraglia F, De Riso M, Continolo N. Remifentanil in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Mar;20(3):246-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03241.x. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

    PMID: 20102527BACKGROUND
  • Kim SH, Stoicea N, Soghomonyan S, Bergese SD. Intraoperative use of remifentanil and opioid induced hyperalgesia/acute opioid tolerance: systematic review. Front Pharmacol. 2014 May 8;5:108. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00108. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 24847273BACKGROUND
  • Abreu M, Aguado D, Benito J, Garcia-Fernandez J, Segura IA. Hyperalgesia and increased sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration induced by opioids in the rat: a randomised experimental study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Apr;32(4):232-41. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000188.

    PMID: 25485881BACKGROUND
  • Weinbroum AA. Role of anaesthetics and opioids in perioperative hyperalgesia: one step towards familiarisation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Apr;32(4):230-1. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000231. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25747314BACKGROUND
  • Santonocito C, Noto A, Crimi C, Sanfilippo F. Remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia: current perspectives on mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Local Reg Anesth. 2018 Apr 9;11:15-23. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S143618. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29670398BACKGROUND
  • Guignard B, Bossard AE, Coste C, Sessler DI, Lebrault C, Alfonsi P, Fletcher D, Chauvin M. Acute opioid tolerance: intraoperative remifentanil increases postoperative pain and morphine requirement. Anesthesiology. 2000 Aug;93(2):409-17. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00019.

    PMID: 10910490BACKGROUND
  • Vinik HR, Kissin I. Rapid development of tolerance to analgesia during remifentanil infusion in humans. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jun;86(6):1307-11. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199806000-00033.

    PMID: 9620525BACKGROUND
  • Lo C, Schwindt S, Sharma R, Dube R, Faraoni D, Steinberg BE, Brown S. Association Between Intraoperative Remifentanil Dosage and Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Adolescent Idiopathic Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesth Analg. 2021 Oct 1;133(4):984-990. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005395.

    PMID: 33555691BACKGROUND
  • Kaur M, Singh PM. Current role of dexmedetomidine in clinical anesthesia and intensive care. Anesth Essays Res. 2011 Jul-Dec;5(2):128-33. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.94750.

    PMID: 25885374BACKGROUND
  • Weerink MAS, Struys MMRF, Hannivoort LN, Barends CRM, Absalom AR, Colin P. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Aug;56(8):893-913. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0507-7.

    PMID: 28105598BACKGROUND
  • Blaudszun G, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramer MR. Effect of perioperative systemic alpha2 agonists on postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1312-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31825681cb.

    PMID: 22546966BACKGROUND
  • Mason KP, Lerman J. Review article: Dexmedetomidine in children: current knowledge and future applications. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1129-42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b8629. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

    PMID: 21821507BACKGROUND
  • Plambech MZ, Afshari A. Dexmedetomidine in the pediatric population: a review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Mar;81(3):320-32. Epub 2014 May 14.

    PMID: 24824958BACKGROUND
  • Wang Q, Chen C, Wang L. Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine in maintaining hemodynamic stability in pediatric cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Jan-Feb;98(1):15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

    PMID: 34252370BACKGROUND
  • Kiski D, Malec E, Schmidt C. Use of dexmedetomidine in pediatric cardiac anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jun;32(3):334-342. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000731.

    PMID: 30893120BACKGROUND
  • Josephine C, Shariffuddin II, Chaw SH, Ng KWS, Ng KT. Hemodynamic Response of High- and Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine of Pediatric in General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Asian J Anesthesiol. 2021 Mar 1;59(1):7-21. doi: 10.6859/aja.202103_59(1).0002. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

    PMID: 33504143BACKGROUND
  • Gan L, Zhao X, Chen X. The Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Sedation and Postoperative Behaviors in Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Jan;56(1):16-26. doi: 10.1177/10600280211009845. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

    PMID: 33913336BACKGROUND
  • Zhang SJ, Lai G, Griffis CA, Schiltz M, Aroke EN. alpha2-Adrenergic Receptor Agonist, an Attractive but Underused ERAS Component in Improving Fast-Track Recovery and Surgical Outcomes. AANA J. 2021 Dec;89(6):529-537.

    PMID: 34809759BACKGROUND
  • Naduvanahalli Vivekanandaswamy A, Prasad Shetty A, Mugesh Kanna R, Shanmuganathan R. An analysis of the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in posterior spinal fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized study. Eur Spine J. 2021 Mar;30(3):698-705. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06539-9. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

    PMID: 32696258BACKGROUND
  • Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Poepping DM, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of intraoperative dexmedetomidine for acute postoperative pain in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):170-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12030. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

    PMID: 23043461BACKGROUND
  • Schnabel A, Meyer-Friessem CH, Reichl SU, Zahn PK, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Is intraoperative dexmedetomidine a new option for postoperative pain treatment? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2013 Jul;154(7):1140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.029. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

    PMID: 23706726BACKGROUND
  • Tobias JD, Goble TJ, Bates G, Anderson JT, Hoernschemeyer DG. Effects of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery in adolescents. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Nov;18(11):1082-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02733.x.

    PMID: 18717802BACKGROUND
  • Anschel DJ, Aherne A, Soto RG, Carrion W, Hoegerl C, Nori P, Seidman PA. Successful intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery using a total intravenous anesthetic regimen including dexmedetomidine. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;25(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318163cca6.

    PMID: 18303561BACKGROUND
  • Bagatini A, Volquind D, Rosso A, Trindade RD, Splettstosser JC. [Dexmedetomidine as adjuvant drug for wake-up test during scoliosis correction surgery: case report.]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2004 Apr;54(2):247-51. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942004000200012. Portuguese.

    PMID: 19471732BACKGROUND
  • Chen Z, Dai N, Lin S, Zhou G. Impact of Dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative Wake-Up Tests in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2018 Aug;33(4):448-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.07.009. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

    PMID: 30077288BACKGROUND
  • Grape S, Kirkham KR, Frauenknecht J, Albrecht E. Intra-operative analgesia with remifentanil vs. dexmedetomidine: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2019 Jun;74(6):793-800. doi: 10.1111/anae.14657. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

    PMID: 30950522BACKGROUND
  • Hwang W, Lee J, Park J, Joo J. Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil in postoperative pain control after spinal surgery: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Feb 24;15:21. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0004-1. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 25750586BACKGROUND
  • Wilson SH, Hellman KM, James D, Adler AC, Chandrakantan A. Mechanisms, diagnosis, prevention and management of perioperative opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain Manag. 2021 Apr;11(4):405-417. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0105. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

    PMID: 33779215BACKGROUND
  • Crawford MW, Hickey C, Zaarour C, Howard A, Naser B. Development of acute opioid tolerance during infusion of remifentanil for pediatric scoliosis surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jun;102(6):1662-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000216036.95705.c2.

    PMID: 16717305BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Remifentanil

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropionatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

The study terminated early. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) is a monitor of spinal cord integrity, used to detect and prevent new neurological deficits in the context of spine surgery. Following anecdotally observed effects of some anesthetics interfering with MEP in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery, the surgeon involved in the study decided to pause enrollment and ultimately terminate the study early out of caution for patients.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Glenn Tan, MD
Organization
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Glenn Tan, M.D.

    Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
The following persons are masked: 1. Participant and parents 2. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) staff taking care of patient postoperatively 3. Surgeon
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Pediatric Anesthesia

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2023

First Posted

October 23, 2023

Study Start

December 20, 2023

Primary Completion

December 24, 2024

Study Completion

December 24, 2024

Last Updated

November 10, 2025

Results First Posted

November 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations