NCT06093776

Brief Summary

Rib fractures lead to poor patient outcomes and even death 3. Data suggests effective pain management is crucial to obtain favorable outcomes 4, 5Current outpatient treatment modalities are limited to oral or topical medications with low efficacy and high risk for opioid dependence. In-patient management with a thoracic epidural TEA is largely considered the gold standard, but the risks of TEA may outweigh the benefits 6 to 8.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 5, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 26, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2023

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 12, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 12, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 23, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 26, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Assessment

    Pain assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain NRS Pain McGill Pain Questionnaire \[MPQ\]), hospital LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, pain interference (using the Brief Pain Inventory \[BPI\]), sleep interference (using the Medical Outcomes Sleep Scale \[MOS-Sleep\]), sleep quality (using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index \[PSQI\]), quality of life assessment \[14\], adverse events, re-admissions, and patient satisfaction \[15\].

    14 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Demographics

    30 days

Study Arms (1)

Case Series

Prospective: Case Series The investigators will complete ioveraº system training (i.e., cadaveric demonstration) and work with our local surgical team to develop an effective procedure. The technique will then be refined and considered fully developed with three consecutive successful placements. Data reporting to the sponsor will occur once data for the first five successful interventions and the subsequent 14-day follow-ups are completed. Adverse event reporting to the IRB will occur in accordance with GCP standards. Due to the small sample size and short duration, patients lost to follow-up will be an indication for additional enrollment. No more than 10 total subjects will be enrolled.

Device: ioveraº system

Interventions

the use of surgical procedure that produces lesions in peripheral nervous tissue through application of extreme cold

Case Series

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

≥18 years of age Acute pain attributed to rib fracture(s) Able to obtain consent

You may qualify if:

  • years of age Acute pain attributed to rib fracture(s) Able to obtain consent

You may not qualify if:

  • \<18 years of age Pregnant Incarcerated Confounding injuries or significant pain attributed to secondary injury Patients with any of the following: cryoglobulinemia; paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria; cold urticarial; Raynaud's disease; open and/or infected wounds at or near the treatment site

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Methodist Dallas Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, 75203, United States

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Truitt MS, Mooty RC, Amos J, Lorenzo M, Mangram A, Dunn E. Out with the old, in with the new: a novel approach to treating pain associated with rib fractures. World J Surg. 2010 Oct;34(10):2359-62. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0651-9.

    PMID: 20567973BACKGROUND
  • Truitt MS, Murry J, Amos J, Lorenzo M, Mangram A, Dunn E, Moore EE. Continuous intercostal nerve blockade for rib fractures: ready for primetime? J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1548-52; discussion 1552. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823c96e0.

    PMID: 22182865BACKGROUND
  • Ibrahim-Zada I, Bell MT, Campion EM, Pieracci FM, Truitt MS. Delayed presentation of pulmonary hernia following surgical stabilization of severe rib fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Aug;81(2):397-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001102. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27192468BACKGROUND
  • Beard L, Holt B, Snelson C, Parcha C, Smith FG, Veenith T. Analgesia of Patients with Multiple Rib Fractures in Critical Care: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals in the UK. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;24(3):184-189. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23375.

    PMID: 32435097BACKGROUND
  • Ho AM, Ho AK, Mizubuti GB, Klar G, Karmakar MK. Regional analgesia for patients with traumatic rib fractures: A narrative review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jan;88(1):e22-e30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002524. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31688827BACKGROUND
  • Carrier FM, Turgeon AF, Nicole PC, Trepanier CA, Fergusson DA, Thauvette D, Lessard MR. Effect of epidural analgesia in patients with traumatic rib fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;56(3):230-42. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9052-7. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

    PMID: 19247744BACKGROUND
  • McKendy KM, Lee LF, Boulva K, Deckelbaum DL, Mulder DS, Razek TS, Grushka JR. Epidural analgesia for traumatic rib fractures is associated with worse outcomes: a matched analysis. J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 15;214:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.057. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

    PMID: 28624032BACKGROUND
  • Sheets NW, Davis JW, Dirks RC, Pang AW, Kwok AM, Wolfe MM, Sue LP. Intercostal Nerve Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Epidural Analgesia for the Treatment of Traumatic Rib Fracture. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jul;231(1):150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.044. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

    PMID: 32081750BACKGROUND
  • Britt T, Sturm R, Ricardi R, Labond V. Comparative evaluation of continuous intercostal nerve block or epidural analgesia on the rate of respiratory complications, intensive care unit, and hospital stay following traumatic rib fractures: a retrospective review. Local Reg Anesth. 2015 Oct 27;8:79-84. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S80498. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26604819BACKGROUND
  • Mohta M, Verma P, Saxena AK, Sethi AK, Tyagi A, Girotra G. Prospective, randomized comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and thoracic paravertebral infusion in patients with unilateral multiple fractured ribs--a pilot study. J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4):1096-101. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318166d76d.

    PMID: 19359920BACKGROUND
  • Cadaval Gallardo C, Martinez J, Bellia-Munzon G, Nazar M, Sanjurjo D, Toselli L, Martinez-Ferro M. Thoracoscopic cryoanalgesia: A new strategy for postoperative pain control in minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair. Cir Pediatr. 2020 Jan 20;33(1):11-15. English, Spanish.

    PMID: 32166917BACKGROUND
  • Dekonenko C, Dorman RM, Duran Y, Juang D, Aguayo P, Fraser JD, Oyetunji TA, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Millspaugh DL, St Peter SD. Postoperative pain control modalities for pectus excavatum repair: A prospective observational study of cryoablation compared to results of a randomized trial of epidural vs patient-controlled analgesia. J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Aug;55(8):1444-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Oct 26.

    PMID: 31699436BACKGROUND
  • Farley P, Griffin RL, Jansen JO, Bosarge PL. Quantifying Pain Associated With Rib Fractures. J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:476-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.032. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

    PMID: 31668607BACKGROUND
  • Burckhardt CS, Anderson KL. The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Oct 23;1:60. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-60.

    PMID: 14613562BACKGROUND
  • Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Oct;14(5):353-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.353.

    PMID: 12389801BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Conner McDaniel, MD

    Methodist Heath System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2023

First Posted

October 23, 2023

Study Start

June 5, 2023

Primary Completion

June 12, 2025

Study Completion

June 12, 2025

Last Updated

March 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Study data or any protected health information will not be shared with anyone that is not delegated to the study. The PI is committed to disseminate research results in a timely fashion. Sharing of results generated by the data analysis during the course of the project will be through presentation at national scientific meetings and/or publication in open access journals. All information obtained will be source de-identified and presented on a large scale and not traceable to any one particular individual. Data will be shared with the sponsor after all identifiers are removed and a data use agreement fully executed prior to dissemination of any data.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
All study-related documents will be retained by the CRI until at least three years after study completion or according to local laws, whichever is longer.
Access Criteria
ClinicalTrials.gov

Locations