NCT06093763

Brief Summary

INTRODUCTION A variety of bone grafts and substitutes are available for filling bone defects in the distal radius after corrective osteotomy, but the harvesting of bone from the iliac crest is the gold standard as it allows easy access to corticocancellous bone of a desirable quality and quantity. The idea behind bone grafting is to provide optimal bone formation and structural stability, which is crucial for bone healing. However, the harvesting and use of bone from the iliac crest potentially comes with the risk of complications such as delayed union of the osteotomy defect; size mismatch between the graft and the osteotomy defect; longer operation time; donor site morbidity including nerve, arterial, and ureteral injury; herniation of abdominal contents; sacroiliac joint instability; pelvic fractures; hematoma and infection. As these disadvantages of bone grafting can have a major impact on patients' everyday lives, research is needed on whether bone grafting is genuinely necessary during corrective osteotomy and plate fixation of the distal radius OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to investigate whether harvested bone graft from the iliac crest necessary is during corrective osteotomy and plate fixation in patients with malunited distal radius fractures. STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Patients will undergo the following examinations once before the operation and five times afterwards: 1) the patients will fill out three questionnaires, 2) complications will be noted, 3) the wrist function will be measured, and 4) radiographs/CT scans will be made. STUDY POPULATION All patients over the age of 18 years who have a symptomatic malunion after distal radius fracture and are eligible for surgical correction. INTERVENTION Surgical correction in the form of open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation without bone grafting. USUAL CARE Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation with harvesting bone from the iliac crest. OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes: complications and quality of life. Secondary outcomes: time to complete bone healing, functional outcomes, and cost effectiveness.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2023

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 10, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

open wedge osteotomybone graftingtime of bone healingcomplicationsQuality of lifeSubjective and objective functional outcomesCost effectiveness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Complications

    number and severity during and after the operation

    follow-up period of at least one year

  • Quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire

    EQ-5D-5L questionnaire

    follow-up period of one year

  • Time to complete bone healing

    Bone healing will be considered complete when the osteotomy gap is filled with bone formation.

    follow-up period of one year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Subjective functional outcomes

    follow-up period of one year

  • Subjective functional outcome

    follow-up period of one year

  • Objective functional outcomes

    follow-up period of one year

  • Cost effectiveness

    follow-up period of at least one year

Study Arms (2)

Patients with symptomatic malunion of distal radius receiving bone grafting

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation with harvesting and using bone from the iliac crest.

Procedure: Group with bone grafting

Patients with symptomatic malunion of distal radius receiving none bone grafts

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation without harvesting and using bone from the iliac crest.

Procedure: Group without bone grafting

Interventions

Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation without bone grafting.

Patients with symptomatic malunion of distal radius receiving none bone grafts

Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation with harvesting and using bone from the iliac crest.

Patients with symptomatic malunion of distal radius receiving bone grafting

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients of either sex over the age of 18 years
  • Symptomatic malunion of the distal radius
  • Eligible for open wedge osteotomy and plate fixation with or without bone grafting from iliac crest.
  • Patients are able to undergo postoperative follow-up of at least 12 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients who have known systemic or metabolic disorders leading to progressive bone deterioration
  • Patients who take chronic use of glucocorticoids.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

MaastrichtUMC

Maastricht, Zuid-Limburg, 6229 HX, Netherlands

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Population GroupsBone Transplantation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DemographyPopulation CharacteristicsTissue TransplantationCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyBiological TherapyTherapeuticsOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeTransplantation

Study Officials

  • Pascal Hannemann, MD

    Maastricht University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Dominique Disseldorp, MD

CONTACT

Fabienne Hameleers

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
A web based randomisation tool will used for randomization according to the GCP-guidelines. Prestratification per hospital will be performed. Patients and the treating surgeon cannot be blinded for the treatment because a part of these patients will undergo bone grafting derived from the iliac crest. The statistician will be blinded for the treatment. 6.3 Study
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: All included patients will undergo an open wedge osteotomy and plate fixation according to the standard surgical techniques. In one group, the bone defect will be filled with bone graft of the iliac crest after open wedge osteotomy according the standard procedure. The other group includes patients who will not receive any bone grafts. The participating hospitals have extensive experience with both treatments.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2023

First Posted

October 23, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

June 11, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations