Adjuvants With Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia
Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam as Adjuvants With Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in High Tibial Osteotomy. A Randomized, Prospective, Double- Blinded, Comparative Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
90
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine and midazolam combined with bupivacaine in high tibial osteotomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 postoperative-pain
Started Nov 2023
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedOctober 16, 2023
October 1, 2023
1 year
October 4, 2023
October 13, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to first analgesic request
Time to first analgesic request calculated from the administration of local anesthetic
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
analgesic consumption
24 hours
Incidence of complications
24 hours
Study Arms (3)
Group M (midazolam group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORincludes thirty patients who receive intrathecal 4 mL (20 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 1 mg midazolam (8 units of 5 mg/mL preservative-free midazolam loaded in a 40 unit insulin syringe).
Group D(dexmedetomidine group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORincludes thirty patients who receive intrathecal 4 mL (20 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 mcg dexmedetomidine (2 units of 100 mcg/mL preservative-free dexmedetomidine loaded in a 40 unit insulin syringe).
Group C(control group)
PLACEBO COMPARATORincludes thirty patients who receive intrathecal 4 mL (20 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL of 0.9% saline .
Interventions
Under strict aseptic conditions, a lumbar puncture will be performed with selective technique in sitting position at L2-3 or L3-4 interspaces with midline approach using a 25-G Quincke's needle. After achieving the free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, the study drug will be injected into the subarachnoid space, immediately after injection the patient will be asked for supine position.
20 mg bupivacaine intrathecal administration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 18-60 years.
- Gender: Both males and females.
- Scheduled patients for High tibial osteotomy under spinal anesthesia.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status: I and II
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- Allergy to the studied drugs.
- Patients with contraindications to spinal anesthesia.
- Patients with advanced decompensated cardiac, respiratory,renal or hepatic diseases
- Coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia
- CNS diseases as epilepsy, stroke or psychiatric illness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Brennan F, Carr DB, Cousins M. Pain management: a fundamental human right. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):205-21. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000268145.52345.55.
PMID: 17578977BACKGROUNDChaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Oct;42(10):891-903. doi: 10.1007/BF03011037.
PMID: 8706199BACKGROUNDKanazi GE, Aouad MT, Jabbour-Khoury SI, Al Jazzar MD, Alameddine MM, Al-Yaman R, Bulbul M, Baraka AS. Effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine or clonidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine spinal block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Feb;50(2):222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00919.x.
PMID: 16430546BACKGROUNDMohler H, Okada T. Benzodiazepine receptor: demonstration in the central nervous system. Science. 1977 Nov 25;198(4319):849-51. doi: 10.1126/science.918669.
PMID: 918669BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohamed Youssef
Assiut University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mahmoud Kamel
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2023
First Posted
October 13, 2023
Study Start
November 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10