NCT06074172

Brief Summary

The main objectives of this study were to test if a singular dose of Cannabidiol (1) enhances the learning and memory of healthy human subjects, (2) test if Cannabidiol has negative effects on Retroactive and Proactive Interference during learning, (3) and test if demographic factors will influence CBD's modulation of human learning and memory.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 14, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 6, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 6, 2020

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 10, 2023

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 24, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

September 26, 2023

Results QC Date

June 26, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Sum of Trials (I-V)

    Sum of Trials = Trial A1 + Trial A2 + Trial A3 + Trial A4 + Trial A5; Trial A1/A2/A3/A4/A5 are in reference to each trial in which list A is recalled during memory encoding. The score range for Sum of Trials is 0 to 75. A higher score is indicative of greater performance on the memory test and a lower score is indicative of lower performance on the memory test. Participants were instructed to listen to a list of 15 words (List A) read to them. Subjects were asked recall List A during five different trials (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5), with the words repeated to them after each trial. Participants were scored for the number of correctly repeated words for each trial.

    Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall

  • Proactive Interference Ratio (PI Ratio)

    PI Ratio = Trial B1/A1. Proactive interference is the tendency for previously learned information to affect to hinder learning of new information. A higher proactive interference ratio indicates protective effects on memory i.e. protection from interference during learning. A lower proactive interference is indicative of negative effects on memory caused from interference. Trial A1 is in reference to list A recall during the first trial. Trial B1 is in reference to list B recall. Highest score for each trial is 15 with a point awarded for each correctly recalled word from List A (15 words) and List B (15 words).

    Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall

  • Retroactive Interference Ratio (RI Ratio)

    RI Ratio = Trial A6/A5. Retroactive interference is the tendency for newly learned information to hinder the memory of previously learned information. A higher retroactive interference ratio indicates protection from interference during learning. A lower retroactive interference ratio is indicative of negative effects on memory caused from interference. Trial A6 is referring to delayed recall of list A; Trial A5 is referring to the fifth trial of list A recall. Highest score for each trial is 15 with a point awarded for each word correctly recalled from List A (15 words).

    Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall

  • Total Prose Recall

    Total Prose Recall = Immediate Recall + Delayed Recall; Recall of a prose story was done immediately then after a delay; Highest score for prose recall test is 25 with a point awarded for each item correctly recalled in the story (25 total items). A higher recall score is indicative of better memory.

    Each recall takes about 5 min for encoding and recall

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score

    Assessment of basal cognitive function; The range for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores is 0 to 30. A higher recall score is indicative of better performance on the memory test. A lower recall score is indicative of worse performance on the memory test.

    10 minutes total for encoding and recall

Study Arms (2)

Placebo, Then Cannabidiol

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants first received a Placebo 246 mg press pill during visit 1. After a washout period of 1 week, subjects received a Cannabidiol press pill during visit 2.

Drug: Placebo (246mg press pill)

Cannabidiol, Then Placebo

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants first received a Cannabidiol 246 mg press pill during visit 1. After a washout period of 1 week, subjects received a Placebo press pill during visit 2.

Drug: Cannabidiol (246mg press pill)

Interventions

Cannabidiol press pills provided by Steve Goods CBD (Longmont, Colorado). CBD pills were tested by the chemistry lab at CSU Pueblo and by Botanacor in Denver, CO. Both laboratories determined CBD pills to be 99.98% pure with no THC, heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticides detected.

Cannabidiol, Then Placebo

Placebo press pills were provided by Steve Goods CBD (Longmont, Colorado). Placebo pills were tested by the chemistry lab at CSU Pueblo and by Botanacar in Denver, CO. Both laboratories determined placebo pills to be pure with no heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticides detected.

Placebo, Then Cannabidiol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Were 18 years of age or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Were pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Had been diagnosed with mental illness
  • Didn't speak English fluently
  • Had severe hearing problems
  • Had recreational or opioid drug contaminants in their urine
  • Were involved in criminal activity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Colorado State University Pueblo

Pueblo, Colorado, 81001, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Gebregzi HH, Zeiger JS, Smith JP, Stuyt L, Cullen L, Carsella J, Rogers DC, Lafebre J, Knalfec J, Vargas A, Diawara MM. Oral cannabidiol did not impair learning and memory in healthy adults. J Cannabis Res. 2025 Jan 23;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00262-2.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Cannabidiol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CannabinoidsTerpenesHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Moussa Diawara
Organization
Colorado State University Pueblo

Study Officials

  • Moussa M Diawara, PhD

    Colorado State University-Pueblo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Two-arm Case-Crossover
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2023

First Posted

October 10, 2023

Study Start

March 14, 2020

Primary Completion

November 6, 2020

Study Completion

November 6, 2020

Last Updated

March 24, 2025

Results First Posted

March 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual (de-identified) participant data is to be made available to other researchers.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
Data will become available upon request.
Access Criteria
Data will become available upon request.

Locations