The Effect of Cannabidiol in Learning and Memory of Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
57
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objectives of this study were to test if a singular dose of Cannabidiol (1) enhances the learning and memory of healthy human subjects, (2) test if Cannabidiol has negative effects on Retroactive and Proactive Interference during learning, (3) and test if demographic factors will influence CBD's modulation of human learning and memory.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Mar 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 24, 2025
CompletedMarch 24, 2025
March 1, 2025
8 months
September 26, 2023
June 26, 2024
March 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Sum of Trials (I-V)
Sum of Trials = Trial A1 + Trial A2 + Trial A3 + Trial A4 + Trial A5; Trial A1/A2/A3/A4/A5 are in reference to each trial in which list A is recalled during memory encoding. The score range for Sum of Trials is 0 to 75. A higher score is indicative of greater performance on the memory test and a lower score is indicative of lower performance on the memory test. Participants were instructed to listen to a list of 15 words (List A) read to them. Subjects were asked recall List A during five different trials (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5), with the words repeated to them after each trial. Participants were scored for the number of correctly repeated words for each trial.
Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
Proactive Interference Ratio (PI Ratio)
PI Ratio = Trial B1/A1. Proactive interference is the tendency for previously learned information to affect to hinder learning of new information. A higher proactive interference ratio indicates protective effects on memory i.e. protection from interference during learning. A lower proactive interference is indicative of negative effects on memory caused from interference. Trial A1 is in reference to list A recall during the first trial. Trial B1 is in reference to list B recall. Highest score for each trial is 15 with a point awarded for each correctly recalled word from List A (15 words) and List B (15 words).
Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
Retroactive Interference Ratio (RI Ratio)
RI Ratio = Trial A6/A5. Retroactive interference is the tendency for newly learned information to hinder the memory of previously learned information. A higher retroactive interference ratio indicates protection from interference during learning. A lower retroactive interference ratio is indicative of negative effects on memory caused from interference. Trial A6 is referring to delayed recall of list A; Trial A5 is referring to the fifth trial of list A recall. Highest score for each trial is 15 with a point awarded for each word correctly recalled from List A (15 words).
Each trial is 45 seconds for encoding and recall
Total Prose Recall
Total Prose Recall = Immediate Recall + Delayed Recall; Recall of a prose story was done immediately then after a delay; Highest score for prose recall test is 25 with a point awarded for each item correctly recalled in the story (25 total items). A higher recall score is indicative of better memory.
Each recall takes about 5 min for encoding and recall
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score
Assessment of basal cognitive function; The range for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores is 0 to 30. A higher recall score is indicative of better performance on the memory test. A lower recall score is indicative of worse performance on the memory test.
10 minutes total for encoding and recall
Study Arms (2)
Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants first received a Placebo 246 mg press pill during visit 1. After a washout period of 1 week, subjects received a Cannabidiol press pill during visit 2.
Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants first received a Cannabidiol 246 mg press pill during visit 1. After a washout period of 1 week, subjects received a Placebo press pill during visit 2.
Interventions
Cannabidiol press pills provided by Steve Goods CBD (Longmont, Colorado). CBD pills were tested by the chemistry lab at CSU Pueblo and by Botanacor in Denver, CO. Both laboratories determined CBD pills to be 99.98% pure with no THC, heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticides detected.
Placebo press pills were provided by Steve Goods CBD (Longmont, Colorado). Placebo pills were tested by the chemistry lab at CSU Pueblo and by Botanacar in Denver, CO. Both laboratories determined placebo pills to be pure with no heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticides detected.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Were 18 years of age or older
You may not qualify if:
- Were pregnant or breast-feeding
- Had been diagnosed with mental illness
- Didn't speak English fluently
- Had severe hearing problems
- Had recreational or opioid drug contaminants in their urine
- Were involved in criminal activity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Colorado State Universitylead
- Institute of Cannabis Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Colorado State University Pueblo
Pueblo, Colorado, 81001, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gebregzi HH, Zeiger JS, Smith JP, Stuyt L, Cullen L, Carsella J, Rogers DC, Lafebre J, Knalfec J, Vargas A, Diawara MM. Oral cannabidiol did not impair learning and memory in healthy adults. J Cannabis Res. 2025 Jan 23;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00262-2.
PMID: 39849639DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Moussa Diawara
- Organization
- Colorado State University Pueblo
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Moussa M Diawara, PhD
Colorado State University-Pueblo
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2023
First Posted
October 10, 2023
Study Start
March 14, 2020
Primary Completion
November 6, 2020
Study Completion
November 6, 2020
Last Updated
March 24, 2025
Results First Posted
March 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data will become available upon request.
- Access Criteria
- Data will become available upon request.
Individual (de-identified) participant data is to be made available to other researchers.