NCT06073223

Brief Summary

The study will include 50 patients newly diagnosed with low-risk thyroid cancer ranging from 18-80 years of age. After scheduling their surgeon visit, the investigators will enroll patients and measure their intended treatment choice, baseline awareness of the three treatment options, expected outcomes, self-efficacy, and activation. The participants will then be randomized 1:1 and deliver the CQUPLE intervention to the intervention group. The control group will receive usual care, which involves providing no disease or treatment specific information outside the surgeon visit. The study team will repeat all measures prior to the surgical consult and after the surgical consult. The study team will record the patients' actual treatment choice after the consult.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 18, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 10, 2023

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

September 26, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 12, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Acceptability of the CQUPLE intervention to patients

    This 4-item quantitative instrument assesses participants' views on the acceptability of a novel intervention, such as CQUPLE. The response option are on a 5-point scale from 'completely disagree' to 'completely agree.' Scales are created for each measure by averaging responses. Scale values range from 1 to 5. No items need to be reverse coded. Interventional group only.

    up to 14 days after visit

  • Acceptability of the CQUPLE intervention to providers

    This 15-question quantitative instrument measures physician acceptability of decision support interventions with respect to ease of use and approach. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5 ('strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree'). Responses are reported descriptively in terms of proportions responding positively or negatively on each criterion.

    at 6 months, and 2 years

  • Feasibility of the CQUPLE intervention (recruitment)

    Recruitment rate will be defined as the number of patients who confirm eligibility during the screening process (they can be screened by phone or by questions in Qualtrics prior to consent) divided by the number who consent to participate.

    up to 7 days after surgery

  • Feasibility of the CQUPLE intervention (retention)

    Retention will be defined as the number who complete the entire study (pre- and post-assessments) divided by the number consented.

    up to 7 days after surgery

  • Feasibility of the CQUPLE intervention (burden of data collection on study team)

    To measure burden of data collection, the investigators will record the number of emails, texts, and phone calls needed for each participant to complete the measures.

    up to 7 days after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Effect of CQUPLE on patient treatment choice

    baseline, pre-visit and post visit- up to 7 days

Study Arms (2)

CQUPLE Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

A novel intervention called CQUPLE (pronounced "couple"), which includes two interventions delivered together: (1) a Chart of side-by-side, evidence-based information comparing all three treatment options for low-risk thyroid cancer, including expected outcomes and (2) a Question Prompt List that contains key questions to consider asking the surgeon.

Other: CQUPLE

Usual Care Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control group will receive usual care, which involves providing no disease or treatment specific information outside the surgeon visit.

Other: Usual Care

Interventions

The control group will receive usual care, which involves providing no disease or treatment specific information outside the surgeon visit.

Usual Care Control
CQUPLEOTHER

Our research team developed a novel intervention called CQUPLE (pronounced "couple"), which includes two interventions delivered together: (1) a Chart of side-by-side, evidence-based information comparing all three treatment options for low-risk thyroid cancer, including expected outcomes and (2) a Question Prompt List that contains key questions to consider asking the surgeon. The intervention is grounded in social cognitive theory and aims to increase patient awareness of treatment options and their outcomes, patient activation, and self-efficacy for decision making.

CQUPLE Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 to 80 years
  • Low risk papillary thyroid cancer or highly suspicious for cancer
  • Low risk papillary thyroid cancer
  • cT1-2: Tumor size 4 cm or smaller and limited to the thyroid on ultrasound
  • cN0: No evidence of lymph node metastasis on ultrasound
  • cM0: No evidence of distant metastasis on imaging
  • Highly suspicious for cancer
  • Cytology meeting Bethesda V or Bethesday III or IV with molecular testing indicating a 70% risk of greater of thyroid cancer
  • Nodule size 4 cm and smaller
  • Limited to the thyroid on ultrasound
  • No evidence of suspicious lymph nodes
  • No evidence of thyroid cancer outside of the neck
  • Referred for surgical consultation.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of previous thyroid cancer or thyroid surgery and parathyroid surgery
  • Non-English speaking
  • Deaf
  • Subject Selection (for Surgeons)
  • Performs at least one thyroid surgery annually on adults
  • Credentialed at Michigan Medicine
  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Michigan Cancer Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Thyroid Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endocrine Gland NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsEndocrine System DiseasesThyroid Diseases

Study Officials

  • Susan Pitt

    University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The control group will be blinded to the intervention and receive usual care, which involves providing no disease or treatment specific information outside the surgeon visit.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2023

First Posted

October 10, 2023

Study Start

September 18, 2023

Primary Completion

December 20, 2025

Study Completion

December 20, 2025

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The investigators will make de-identified data available on a by request basis and will require a DUA

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
A data set comprised of survey data, interview and conversation transcripts, and metadata will be made available for non-profit research purposes within one year of the completion of the funded project period or upon acceptance of the data for publication, whichever is earlier.
Access Criteria
The data set will be made available to external investigators and the public on a case-by-case basis, to be approved by the PI and in accordance with institutional, HIPAA, state and federal regulations. A data-sharing agreement may be instituted, depending upon the data to be shared.

Locations