NCT06067750

Brief Summary

A study in the use of the Narcotrend depth of anaesthesia monitor to record a) seizures, and b) monitor a level of sedation referred to as 'burst suppression', in sedated patients in the adult and paediatric intensive care. Studies have shown that patients in coma on the intensive care unit may have subclinical in addition to clinical seizures. Subclinical seizures are seizures that do not show any outward signs and may go undetected. The current gold standard of recording seizures in the intensive care unit is by non-invasive, continuous monitoring of the electrical activity of the brain by electroencephalography (cEEG) using cerebral function analysing monitor (CFAM). This is recorded with simultaneous video recording and is performed by Clinical Neurophysiology departments. There has been a steady increase in demand for this service over recent years. Additionally, CFAM / cEEG is labour intensive and expensive. If trends continue, the proportion of hospitals offering CFAM / cEEG will continue to rise, creating increased demand for specialist staff, of which there are a finite number. Depth of anaesthesia monitors are used by anaesthetists to assess the level of anaesthesia in sedated patients using specialised, automated EEG analysis and are now recommended by NICE (DG6) to tailor anaesthetic dose to individual patients. This study aims to investigate the utility of the Narcotrend depth of anaesthesia monitor to monitor for seizures and burst suppression on the adult and paediatric intensive care unit. These monitors are cheaper and more widely available with the scope to be used at every bed space requiring neuro observation on the intensive care unit. The study aims to recruit all patients who are referred for CFAM / cEEG monitoring at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) Trust over a 12 month period. These patients will undergo simultaneous recording using CFAM / cEEG and depth of anaesthesia monitoring.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 27, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 7, 2023

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 5, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 25, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 25, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 14, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

September 7, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

NarcotrendContinuous ElectroencephalographyCerebral Function Analysing MonitorDepth of Anaesthesia MonitorSeizuresBurst SuppressionIntensive Care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Seizure detection

    The number of seizures detected and verified by the Narcotrend monitor when compared to the number of seizures detected by conventional CFAM / cEEG monitoring. Seizure activity is detected by analysing changes in brain activity. This is done by visually analysing waveforms

    Up to 72 hours monitoring of each patient

  • Burst suppression monitoring

    The number of periods of burst suppression detected and verified by the Narcotrend monitor when compared and detected by conventional CFAM / cEEG monitoring. Burst suppression is detected by analysing changes in brain activity. This is done by visually analysing waveforms

    Up to 72 hours monitoring of each patient

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Interrater reliability

    Up to 72 hours monitoring of each patient

Study Arms (1)

Patients referred to Clinical Neurophysiology for Cerebral Function Analysing Monitoring (CFAM)

Patients referred from both adult and paediatric intensive care units

Diagnostic Test: Narcotrend compared to Cerebral Function Analysing Monitor (CFAM)

Interventions

All patients will receive Narcotrend and CFAM monitoring in this observational study

Patients referred to Clinical Neurophysiology for Cerebral Function Analysing Monitoring (CFAM)

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Month+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Study population will be all adult and paediatric patients referred for CFAM monitoring, including, but not limited to patients who are at risk of seizures due to status epilepticus, haemorrhage and traumatic brain injury.

You may qualify if:

  • Intensive care CFAM is recommended but not confined to identify non-convulsive seizures and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in critically ill patients with the following:
  • Persistently abnormal mental status following generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) or other clinically evident seizures.
  • Acute supratentorial brain injury with altered mental status. This includes traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, encephalitis, acute ischemic stroke, and during and after therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest.
  • Fluctuating mental status or unexplained alteration of mental status without known acute brain injury: Mental status abnormalities can include agitation, lethargy, fixed or fluctuating neurologic deficits such as aphasia or neglect, obtundation, and coma.
  • Patients requiring pharmacological paralysis and risk for seizures.
  • Clinical paroxysmal events suspected to be seizures, to determine whether they are ictal or non-ictal
  • Patients with suggested secondary brain injury e.g. those with increased intracranial pressure.
  • Monitoring of the response of seizures and status epilepticus to treatment and to a level of burst suppression

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients where CFAM has been requested but a routine EEG is thought to be more appropriate, eg. in cases where a routine 20 minute EEG would answer the clinical / referral question.
  • Next of kin will not be approached to consent for the patient to be enrolled into the study where clinical condition dictates that it would not be appropriate eg. imminent withdrawal of care.
  • Participants will be excluded from the study where consent is not granted or withdrawn. This may be at commencement of the study by parents of paediatric patients or next of kin of adult patients.
  • Data gained from patients who regain capacity to give retrospective consent and then withdraw will also be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nottingham University Hospitals Trust

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Bader MK, Arbour R, Palmer S. Refractory increased intracranial pressure in severe traumatic brain injury: barbiturate coma and bispectral index monitoring. AACN Clin Issues. 2005 Oct-Dec;16(4):526-41. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200510000-00009.

    PMID: 16269897BACKGROUND
  • Arbour RB, Dissin J. Predictive value of the bispectral index for burst suppression on diagnostic electroencephalogram during drug-induced coma. J Neurosci Nurs. 2015 Apr;47(2):113-22. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000124.

    PMID: 25629593BACKGROUND
  • Berger-Estilita J, Steck K, Vetter C, Seidel K, Krejci V, Hight D, Kaiser H. A case report of several intraoperative convulsions while using the Narcotrend monitor: Significance and predictive use. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(47):e18004. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018004.

    PMID: 31764814BACKGROUND
  • Dahaba AA, Liu DW, Metzler H. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring of acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures (AERRPS). Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Apr;76(4):298-301.

    PMID: 20332745BACKGROUND
  • Dwivedi D, Bhatnagar V, Kiran S, Ray A. Intraoperative seizures during redo cranioplasty for sinking skin flap syndrome- Role of BIS monitor in detection. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):359-360. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_44_17. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28757846BACKGROUND
  • Iturri Clavero F, Tamayo Medel G, de Orte Sancho K, Gonzalez Uriarte A, Iglesias Martinez A, Martinez Ruiz A. Use of BIS VISTA bilateral monitor for diagnosis of intraoperative seizures, a case report. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2015 Dec;62(10):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 3.

    PMID: 25944463BACKGROUND
  • Tallach RE, Ball DR, Jefferson P. Monitoring seizures with the Bispectral index. Anaesthesia. 2004 Oct;59(10):1033-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03953.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15488073BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, TraumaticSubarachnoid HemorrhageCerebral HemorrhageEncephalitisIschemic StrokeStatus EpilepticusSeizuresHematoma, SubduralIntracranial Hypertension

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesIntracranial HemorrhagesCerebrovascular DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeuroinflammatory DiseasesStrokeNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsIntracranial Hemorrhage, TraumaticHematoma

Study Officials

  • Helen Sneath, DClinSci-stu

    NUH

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ziad Alrifai, MBChB(Hons)

    Nottingham University Hospitals Trust

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2023

First Posted

October 5, 2023

Study Start

June 27, 2023

Primary Completion

May 25, 2024

Study Completion

May 25, 2024

Last Updated

July 14, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations