LAmbre Versus AMPLATZER Amulet Left AtrIal Appendage Occluder for StRoke ProphylaxIs
AMPIRI
1 other identifier
interventional
226
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this trial is to compare two different commercially available left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices in patients with non-valvular Atrial fibrillation/ atrial flutter (AF) at increased risk for stroke with regard to safety and efficacy. The investigators hypothesize that LAAO using the LAmbre occlusion device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) is non-inferior to LAAO using the AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (Abbott Medical, Chicago, ILL, USA) with regards to the primary endpoint, which is peri-device leak (PDL) size 3 months after LAAO, as assessed with transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in patients with non-valvular AF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2027
ExpectedJanuary 9, 2024
January 1, 2024
2.1 years
September 11, 2023
January 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PDL size after 3 months
Peri-device leak size (in mm) three months after successful LAAO as assessed with TOE.
three months
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Device Sucess
at index prozedure
Procedural Duration
at index procedure
Technical success
during index hospitalization
Procedural success
at index procedure
Device-related complications
at three months
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LAmbre occlusion device
EXPERIMENTALLeft atrial occlusion will be performed with the LAmbre occlusion device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China)
AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device
ACTIVE COMPARATORLeft atrial occlusion will be performed with AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (Abbott Medical, Chicago, ILL, USA)
Interventions
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion will be performed according to current international standards by experienced operators under TOE and angiographic guidance. Either a LAmbre occlusion device (group A) or an AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (group B) will be implanted depending on treatment allocation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years and able to give consent
- Documented paroxysmal, persistent or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation/ atrial flutter (AF) at high risk of stroke or systemic embolism defined by CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 (male) or ≥ 3 (female)
- Patient not eligible for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy
- Deemed suitable for percutaneous LAAO
- Able to comply with the required medication regimen after LAAO device implantation
- Written informed consent
- LAA anatomy can accommodate either a LAmbre or AMPLATZER Amulet LAAO device, as per manufacturer's instruction for use (IFU) (the anatomy and sizing must be appropriate for both devices in order to be enrolled in the trial)
- For women of childbearing potential, negative pregnancy test and agree to use reliable method of birth control during the study
You may not qualify if:
- Indication for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy for a condition other than AF (i. e. pulmonary embolism, mechanical heart valve)
- LAA is obliterated or surgically ligated
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the LAAO devices or components of the required medication regimen
- Prior atrial septal defect (ASD) repair or implantation of ASD closure device
- Active endocarditis or other infection producing bacteremia
- Significant symptomatic carotid artery disease
- Participation in a concurrent clinical trial, which may confound the results of this trial
- Patient cannot adhere to or complete the trial protocol for any reason
- Intracardiac thrombus
- Intracardiac tumor
- Existing, clinically relevant circumferential pericardial effusion
- Significant mitral valve stenosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München
Munich, Bavaria, 80636, Germany
Related Publications (15)
Sick PB, Schuler G, Hauptmann KE, Grube E, Yakubov S, Turi ZG, Mishkel G, Almany S, Holmes DR. Initial worldwide experience with the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Apr 3;49(13):1490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.035. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
PMID: 17397680BACKGROUNDHolmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Mullin CM, Sick P; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009 Aug 15;374(9689):534-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X.
PMID: 19683639BACKGROUNDReddy VY, Holmes D, Doshi SK, Neuzil P, Kar S. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry. Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):417-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976449. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
PMID: 21242484BACKGROUNDHolmes DR Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, Whisenant B, Sievert H, Doshi SK, Huber K, Reddy VY. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 8;64(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.029.
PMID: 24998121BACKGROUNDReddy VY, Doshi SK, Kar S, Gibson DN, Price MJ, Huber K, Horton RP, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Gordon NT, Holmes DR Jr; PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Investigators. 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
PMID: 29103847BACKGROUNDLakkireddy D, Thaler D, Ellis CR, Swarup V, Sondergaard L, Carroll J, Gold MR, Hermiller J, Diener HC, Schmidt B, MacDonald L, Mansour M, Maini B, O'Brien L, Windecker S. Amplatzer Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Versus Watchman Device for Stroke Prophylaxis (Amulet IDE): A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2021 Nov 9;144(19):1543-1552. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057063. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
PMID: 34459659BACKGROUNDHuang H, Liu Y, Xu Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Cao K, Zhang S, Yang Y, Yang X, Huang D, Yu B, Su X, Wu L, Huang C. Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the LAmbre Device for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 13;10(21):2188-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.072.
PMID: 29122133BACKGROUNDPark JW, Sievert H, Kleinecke C, Vaskelyte L, Schnupp S, Sievert K, Lam YY, Stahli BE, Zhang D, Li A, Brachmann J. Left atrial appendage occlusion with lambre in atrial fibrillation: Initial European experience. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;265:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.120.
PMID: 29885707BACKGROUNDChen S, Chun KRJ, Bordignon S, Weise FK, Nagase T, Perrotta L, Bologna F, Schmidt B. Left atrial appendage occlusion using LAmbre Amulet and Watchman in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol. 2019 Apr;73(4):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
PMID: 30583991BACKGROUNDSchnupp S, Liu XX, Buffle E, Gloekler S, Mohrez Y, Cheikh-Ibrahim M, Allakkis W, Brachmann J, Park JW, Kleinecke C. Late clinical outcomes of lambre versus amplatzer occluders for left atrial appendage closure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):934-942. doi: 10.1111/jce.14398. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
PMID: 32072692BACKGROUNDMehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. No abstract available.
PMID: 21670242BACKGROUNDTzikas A, Holmes DR Jr, Gafoor S, Ruiz CE, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Diener HC, Cappato R, Kar S, Lee RJ, Byrne RA, Ibrahim R, Lakkireddy D, Soliman OI, Nabauer M, Schneider S, Brachmann J, Saver JL, Tiemann K, Sievert H, Camm AJ, Lewalter T. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: the Munich consensus document on definitions, endpoints, and data collection requirements for clinical studies. Europace. 2017 Jan;19(1):4-15. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw141. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
PMID: 27540038BACKGROUNDLip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010 Feb;137(2):263-72. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1584. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
PMID: 19762550BACKGROUNDPisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010 Nov;138(5):1093-100. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0134. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
PMID: 20299623BACKGROUNDGlikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, Mandrola J, Camm AJ, Lip GYH, Fauchier L, Betts TR, Lewalter T, Saw J, Tzikas A, Sternik L, Nietlispach F, Berti S, Sievert H, Bertog S, Meier B. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. EuroIntervention. 2020 Jan 17;15(13):1133-1180. doi: 10.4244/EIJY19M08_01. No abstract available.
PMID: 31474583BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Joner, MD
Klinik für Herz- und Kreilauferkankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2023
First Posted
September 29, 2023
Study Start
December 5, 2023
Primary Completion
January 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 15, 2027
Last Updated
January 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share