The FAB Score Inter-rater Reliability Study
Investigating the Inter-rater Reliability of the Functional Assessment for Burns (FAB) Score in Adult Burn Inpatients
1 other identifier
observational
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The Functional Assessment for Burns (FAB) score is an instrument developed by therapists at St Andrew's Burns Centre, Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, where it is currently used as standard protocol to measure the physical functional recovery and independence of adult burn inpatients. The aim of this research is to test the ability of the FAB score to collect accurate data when used by three different therapists observing the same patient carrying out specific functional tasks (i.e. inter-rater reliability).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 12, 2024
January 1, 2024
4 months
August 24, 2023
January 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Level of inter-rater reliability of the Functional Assessment for Burns (FAB) score
Inter-rater reliability of the FAB score when used by three different therapists observing the same patient scoring episode, expressed as Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The FAB score consists of seven daily activities including: feeding, washing, toileting, transfers, dressing, walking and stair climbing. Patients are scored on a numerical scale from 1-5 based on their ability to complete each activity independently, or on the minimum amount of assistance required to complete each task. The total score ranges between 7 (fully dependent) and 35 (fully independent).
As per protocol at St Andrew's: FAB 1 taken within 48 hours admission to burns ward; FAB 2 taken within 48 hours discharge from burns ward; interim FAB scores taken at therapists' discretion
Eligibility Criteria
Male and female patients aged 18 years and over admitted to St Andrew's adult burns ward
You may qualify if:
- Male and female adult patients admitted to St Andrew's burns ward with burn injuries
- ≥18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Patients admitted with medical skin loss conditions
- Unwilling to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Smailes ST, Engelsman K, Rodgers L, Upson C. Increasing the utility of the Functional Assessment for Burns Score: Not just for major burns. Burns. 2016 Feb;42(1):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.09.020. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
PMID: 26508532BACKGROUNDSmailes ST, Engelsman K, Dziewulski P. Physical functional outcome assessment of patients with major burns admitted to a UK Burn Intensive Care Unit. Burns. 2013 Feb;39(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
PMID: 22677162BACKGROUNDEagan JH, Ramdharry G, Smailes ST. Investigating the interrater reliability of a novel functional outcome measure for use in the burns intensive care unit: The Functional Assessment for Burns - Critical Care (FAB-CC). Burns. 2020 Mar;46(2):279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
PMID: 30595543BACKGROUNDMokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
PMID: 20298572BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2023
First Posted
September 28, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the study, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).