Outcome of Two Surgical Methods for IOLImplantation in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of the two IOL implantation methods for eyes with cataract and PEX in a single-center and with highly experienced surgeons. The goal is to acquire relevant information regarding these two IOL implantation techniques, which will help surgeons to decide which approach to choose, ultimately resulting in a benefit for patients with PEX syndrome who require cataract surgery. The main questions are: Is there a difference in lens tilt and decentration between the both methods. Is there a difference in the frequency and amount of capsular phimosis between the both methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2030
October 24, 2023
October 1, 2023
6.6 years
May 11, 2023
October 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The change of lens tilt and decentration from baseline to month 60 postoperatively
The change of lens tilt and decentration from baseline to month 60 postoperatively, measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Baseline to month 60 postoperatively
The difference in decentration and tilt between the "in the bag" and the sulcus intra ocular lens implantation method.
The difference in decentration and tilt between the "in the bag" and the sulcus intra ocular lens implantation method at month 60 post operatively, measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Month 60 postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Capsular phimoses
Month 60 postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Sulcus
OTHEROn the day baseline examination, the first eye to be operated is randomised to receive a 3p-IOL implantation in the capsular bag (group 1) or a 3p-IOL haptics in the ciliary sulcus with the IOL optic tucked in the capsular bag (group 2). The second eye to be operated receives the other method. The eye with the lower visual acuity is operated first, in case of identical visual acuity values the for the patient subjective worse eye is operated first. This procedure is clinical standard.
In the bag
OTHEROn the day baseline examination, the first eye to be operated is randomised to receive a 3p-IOL implantation in the capsular bag (group 1) or a 3p-IOL haptics in the ciliary sulcus with the IOL optic tucked in the capsular bag (group 2). The second eye to be operated receives the other method. The eye with the lower visual acuity is operated first, in case of identical visual acuity values the for the patient subjective worse eye is operated first. This procedure is clinical standard.
Interventions
Femtolaser is used to perform a standard 5.0mm CCC centred on the pupil or limbus and to fragment the lens nucleus toguarantee reproducible results in every eye.After the CCC and nucleus fragmentation the anterior segment is filled with viscoelastics, the rhexis lenticule is removed and hydrodisection of the nucleus is performed. Subsequently phacoemulsification for nucleus and irrigation/aspiration of the lens cortex is performed. The capsular bag and AC is then filled with a cohesive viscoelastic and the IOL is implanted with the haptics in the back or with the haptics in the sulcus. At the end of surgery, the viscoelastic is removed using the irrigation aspiration probe, intracameral antibiotic is instilled, the CCI and paracenteses are hydrated and sealed.
The femto second laser used for certain steps (capsulorhexis, nucleus fragmentation) of the cataract surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 60 - 100
- Necessity for bilateral cataract surgery with pseudoexfoliation syndrome
- willing to give informed consent and follow-up the duration of study
You may not qualify if:
- Endstage glaucoma
- Christalline lens sub/ luxation
- active inflammatory diseases of the eye
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claudette ABELA-FORMANEK, Prof. Dr.
Department for Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Univ. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2023
First Posted
September 25, 2023
Study Start
September 18, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2030
Last Updated
October 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Publications in peer reviewed journals